194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26036980)
21. Comparison of 6th and 7th AJCC TNM staging classification for carcinoma of the stomach in China.
Qiu MZ; Wang ZQ; Zhang DS; Liu Q; Luo HY; Zhou ZW; Li YH; Jiang WQ; Xu RH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Jul; 18(7):1869-76. PubMed ID: 21246404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison between site N-category and number N-category for nodal staging in carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: our experience and literature review.
Aurello P; D'Angelo F; Nigri G; Bellagamba R; Cicchini C; Ruzzetti R; Ramacciato G
Am Surg; 2006 Feb; 72(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 16536239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prognostic and clinical evaluation of patients with T2 gastric cancer.
Komatsu S; Ichikawa D; Kurioka H; Kan K; Shioaki Y; Ueshima Y; Hamashima T; Lee CJ; Ikeda E; Ueda Y; Otsuji E; Oka T; Yamagishi H
Hepatogastroenterology; 2005; 52(63):965-8. PubMed ID: 15966242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and the pancreas: histopathology, staging and prognosis.
Hermanek P
Anticancer Res; 1999; 19(4A):2393-6. PubMed ID: 10470164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Pathology of stomach cancer].
Wittekind C
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1992; ():112-7. PubMed ID: 1493259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Consideration of tumor size improves the accuracy of TNM predictions in patients with gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy.
Lu J; Huang CM; Zheng CH; Li P; Xie JW; Wang JB; Lin JX
Surg Oncol; 2013 Sep; 22(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 23787074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prediction of prognosis is not improved by the seventh and latest edition of the TNM classification for colorectal cancer in a single-center collective.
Nitsche U; Maak M; Schuster T; Künzli B; Langer R; Slotta-Huspenina J; Janssen KP; Friess H; Rosenberg R
Ann Surg; 2011 Nov; 254(5):793-800; discussion 800-1. PubMed ID: 22042471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Stomach cancer: pathologic anatomy, advantage and disadvantages of the TNM system].
Hermanek P
Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1987; 372():567-9. PubMed ID: 3431267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical implication of an insufficient number of examined lymph nodes after curative resection for gastric cancer.
Son T; Hyung WJ; Lee JH; Kim YM; Kim HI; An JY; Cheong JH; Noh SH
Cancer; 2012 Oct; 118(19):4687-93. PubMed ID: 22415925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Problems in the N-classification of the new 1997 UICC TNM stage classification for gastric cancer: an analysis of over 10 years' outcome of Japanese patients.
Nio Y; Yamasawa K; Yamaguchi K; Itakura M; Omori H; Koike M; Kitamura Y; Tsuji M; Endo S; Ogo Y; Yano S; Sumi S
Anticancer Res; 2003; 23(1B):697-705. PubMed ID: 12680170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Validating the prognostic and discriminating value of the TNM-classification for gastric cancer - a critical appraisal.
Röcken C; Behrens HM
Eur J Cancer; 2015 Mar; 51(5):577-86. PubMed ID: 25682192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of the seventh edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for gastric cancer: results from a Chinese monoinstitutional study.
Sun Z; Wang ZN; Zhu Z; Xu YY; Xu Y; Huang BJ; Zhu GL; Xu HM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):1918-27. PubMed ID: 22246426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prognostic value of metastatic lymph node ratio as an additional tool to the TNM stage system in gastric cancer.
Wu XJ; Miao RL; Li ZY; Bu ZD; Zhang LH; Wu AW; Zong XL; Li SX; Shan F; Ji X; Ren H; Ji JF
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jul; 41(7):927-33. PubMed ID: 25913059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Impact of new lymph node staging on lymphadenectomy and on the prognosis of patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer].
Ramacciato G; Aurello P; D'Angelo F; Pezzoli F; Bellagamba R; Nigri G; Cicchini C; Ravaioli M; Ercolani G; Vetrone G; Del Gaudio M; De Angelis R
Chir Ital; 2006; 58(3):285-94. PubMed ID: 16845863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Poor prognostic factors in patients with stage I gastric cancer according to the seventh edition TNM classification: a comparative analysis of three subgroups.
Du C; Zhou Y; Cai H; Zhao G; Fu H; Shi YQ
J Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 105(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 22271501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Improvement of Japanese general rules and the TNM classification of stomach cancer--a proposal for a new stage-grouping].
Maruyama K; Miwa K; Kinoshita T
Gan No Rinsho; 1986 Aug; 32(10):1357-61. PubMed ID: 3783967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Metastasis rates of lymph nodes and distribution in advanced gastric cancer and its clinical significance].
Nzengue JC; Zhan WH; Wang JP; Dong WG; Lan P; He YL; Chen ZX; Cai SR
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Nov; 9(6):506-9. PubMed ID: 17143796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [The current TNM system for gastrointestinal tumors part I].
Wittekind C; Tannapfel A
Pathologe; 2010 Sep; 31(5):344-7. PubMed ID: 20721558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [The new TNM classification and its effect on surgical treatment of stomach cancer].
Schlag P; Buhl K; Schwarz V; Möller P; Herfarth C
Chirurg; 1989 Jan; 60(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 2920623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Proper selection and classification criteria are necessary in the evaluation of the new TNM staging system for gastric cancer.
Marrelli D; Roviello F
Cancer; 2012 Mar; 118(5):1466; author reply 1466-7. PubMed ID: 21766295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
