These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

504 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26037068)

  • 1. Recent progresses in the exploration of machine learning methods as in-silico ADME prediction tools.
    Tao L; Zhang P; Qin C; Chen SY; Zhang C; Chen Z; Zhu F; Yang SY; Wei YQ; Chen YZ
    Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 2015 Jun; 86():83-100. PubMed ID: 26037068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The application of in silico drug-likeness predictions in pharmaceutical research.
    Tian S; Wang J; Li Y; Li D; Xu L; Hou T
    Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 2015 Jun; 86():2-10. PubMed ID: 25666163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In silico ADME-Tox modeling: progress and prospects.
    Alqahtani S
    Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2017 Nov; 13(11):1147-1158. PubMed ID: 28988506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Applying machine learning techniques for ADME-Tox prediction: a review.
    Maltarollo VG; Gertrudes JC; Oliveira PR; Honorio KM
    Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2015 Feb; 11(2):259-71. PubMed ID: 25440524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-throughput and in silico techniques in drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics.
    van de Waterbeemd H
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2002 Jan; 5(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 11865671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Structure-ADME relationship: still a long way to go?
    Hou T; Wang J
    Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2008 Jun; 4(6):759-70. PubMed ID: 18611116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of Oral Pharmacokinetics Using a Combination of In Silico Descriptors and In Vitro ADME Properties.
    Kosugi Y; Hosea N
    Mol Pharm; 2021 Mar; 18(3):1071-1079. PubMed ID: 33512165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can the Internet help to meet the challenges in ADME and e-ADME?
    Van de Waterbeemd H; De Groot M
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2002; 13(3-4):391-401. PubMed ID: 12184380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. truPK -- human pharmacokinetic models for quantitative ADME prediction.
    Subramanian K
    Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2005 Oct; 1(3):555-64. PubMed ID: 16863461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PK/DB: database for pharmacokinetic properties and predictive in silico ADME models.
    Moda TL; Torres LG; Carrara AE; Andricopulo AD
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 24(19):2270-1. PubMed ID: 18684738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of machine learning and nonlinear statistical tools for ADME prediction.
    Sakiyama Y
    Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2009 Feb; 5(2):149-69. PubMed ID: 19239395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In silico prediction of ADME properties: are we making progress?
    Beresford AP; Segall M; Tarbit MH
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2004 Jan; 7(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 14982146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gaussian processes: a method for automatic QSAR modeling of ADME properties.
    Obrezanova O; Csanyi G; Gola JM; Segall MD
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(5):1847-57. PubMed ID: 17602549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic Evaluation of Local and Global Machine Learning Models for the Prediction of ADME Properties.
    Di Lascio E; Gerebtzoff G; Rodríguez-Pérez R
    Mol Pharm; 2023 Mar; 20(3):1758-1767. PubMed ID: 36745394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting ADME properties and side effects: the BioPrint approach.
    Krejsa CM; Horvath D; Rogalski SL; Penzotti JE; Mao B; Barbosa F; Migeon JC
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2003 Jul; 6(4):470-80. PubMed ID: 12951810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Survey of Machine Learning Techniques for Prediction of the Isoform Specificity of Cytochrome P450 Substrates.
    Xiong Y; Qiao Y; Kihara D; Zhang HY; Zhu X; Wei DQ
    Curr Drug Metab; 2019 May; 20(3):229-235. PubMed ID: 30338736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Critically Assessing the Predictive Power of QSAR Models for Human Liver Microsomal Stability.
    Liu R; Schyman P; Wallqvist A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Aug; 55(8):1566-75. PubMed ID: 26170251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In silico predictions of ADME-Tox properties: drug absorption.
    Geerts T; Vander Heyden Y
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2011 Jun; 14(5):339-61. PubMed ID: 21470183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pharmacokinetic properties and in silico ADME modeling in drug discovery.
    Honório KM; Moda TL; Andricopulo AD
    Med Chem; 2013 Mar; 9(2):163-76. PubMed ID: 23016542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Promises of Machine Learning Approaches in Prediction of Absorption of Compounds.
    Kumar R; Sharma A; Siddiqui MH; Tiwari RK
    Mini Rev Med Chem; 2018; 18(3):196-207. PubMed ID: 28302041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.