343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26037891)
21. Active Surveillance is an Appropriate Management Strategy for a Proportion of Men Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer by Prostate Specific Antigen Testing.
Overholser S; Nielsen M; Torkko K; Cwilka D; Weaver B; Shi X; Leach RJ; Hernandez J; Huang T; Thompson IM; Thompson IM
J Urol; 2015 Sep; 194(3):680-4. PubMed ID: 25636657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. National Comprehensive Cancer Network® Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer-Is Active Surveillance Appropriate?
Aghazadeh MA; Frankel J; Belanger M; McLaughlin T; Tortora J; Staff I; Wagner JR
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1196-1201. PubMed ID: 29288120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Outcomes of Active Surveillance after Initial Surveillance Prostate Biopsy.
Kovac E; Lieser G; Elshafei A; Jones JS; Klein EA; Stephenson AJ
J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):84-89. PubMed ID: 27449260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial: VA/NCI/AHRQ Cooperative Studies Program #407 (PIVOT): design and baseline results of a randomized controlled trial comparing radical prostatectomy with watchful waiting for men with clinically localized prostate cancer.
Wilt TJ
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2012 Dec; 2012(45):184-90. PubMed ID: 23271771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Active surveillance: patient selection.
Klotz L
Curr Opin Urol; 2013 May; 23(3):239-44. PubMed ID: 23548978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Active Surveillance as Initial Management of Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer: Data from the PURC.
Botejue M; Abbott D; Danella J; Fonshell C; Ginzburg S; Guzzo TJ; Lanchoney T; Marlowe B; Raman JD; Smaldone M; Tomaszewski JJ; Trabulsi EJ; Uzzo RG; Reese AC
J Urol; 2019 May; 201(5):929-936. PubMed ID: 30720692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: a critical appraisal of rationale and modalities.
Eggener SE; Scardino PT; Carroll PR; Zelefsky MJ; Sartor O; Hricak H; Wheeler TM; Fine SW; Trachtenberg J; Rubin MA; Ohori M; Kuroiwa K; Rossignol M; Abenhaim L;
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2260-7. PubMed ID: 17936815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Metastatic Prostate Cancer in Men Initially Treated with Active Surveillance.
Yamamoto T; Musunuru HB; Vesprini D; Zhang L; Ghanem G; Loblaw A; Klotz L
J Urol; 2016 May; 195(5):1409-1414. PubMed ID: 26707510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Outcomes of initially expectantly managed patients with low or intermediate risk screen-detected localized prostate cancer.
Bul M; van den Bergh RC; Zhu X; Rannikko A; Vasarainen H; Bangma CH; Schröder FH; Roobol MJ
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1672-7. PubMed ID: 22928973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Active surveillance should be considered for select men with Grade Group 2 prostate cancer.
Pekala KR; Bergengren O; Eastham JA; Carlsson SV
BMC Urol; 2023 Sep; 23(1):152. PubMed ID: 37777716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Active surveillance: the Canadian experience with an "inclusive approach".
Klotz L
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2012 Dec; 2012(45):234-41. PubMed ID: 23271779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prostate cancer - active surveillance as a management option.
Yaxley J; Yaxley J; Gardiner R; Yaxley W
Aust Fam Physician; 2013; 42(1-2):74-6. PubMed ID: 23529468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Appropriateness Criteria for Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer.
Cher ML; Dhir A; Auffenberg GB; Linsell S; Gao Y; Rosenberg B; Jafri SM; Klotz L; Miller DC; Ghani KR; Bernstein SJ; Montie JE; Lane BR;
J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 27422298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Limitations in Predicting Organ Confined Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Perlis N; Sayyid R; Evans A; Van Der Kwast T; Toi A; Finelli A; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Zlotta AR; Trachtenberg J; Ghai S; Fleshner NE
J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 27457260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of Pathological and Oncologic Outcomes of Favorable Risk Gleason Score 3 + 4 and Low Risk Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Active Surveillance.
Gearman DJ; Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Karnes RJ
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1188-1195. PubMed ID: 29225057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Population-Based Assessment of Determining Treatments for Prostate Cancer.
Chamie K; Williams SB; Hu JC
JAMA Oncol; 2015 Apr; 1(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 26182305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance one year after diagnosis and before repeat biopsy.
Vasarainen H; Lahdensuo K; Savolainen R; Ruutu M; Taari K; Rannikko A
Scand J Urol; 2013 Dec; 47(6):456-61. PubMed ID: 23327661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Gleason inflation 1998-2011: a registry study of 97,168 men.
Danneman D; Drevin L; Robinson D; Stattin P; Egevad L
BJU Int; 2015 Feb; 115(2):248-55. PubMed ID: 24552193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Active Surveillance: Pathologic and Clinical Variables Associated with Outcome.
Pomerantz M
Surg Pathol Clin; 2015 Dec; 8(4):581-5. PubMed ID: 26612216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: How to Do It Right.
Garisto JD; Klotz L
Oncology (Williston Park); 2017 May; 31(5):333-40, 345. PubMed ID: 28512731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
