706 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26038072)
1. Mandibular canine intrusion with the segmented arch technique: A finite element method study.
Caballero GM; Carvalho Filho OA; Hargreaves BO; Brito HH; Magalhães Júnior PA; Oliveira DD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):691-7. PubMed ID: 26038072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mandibular anterior intrusion using miniscrews for skeletal anchorage: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
González Del Castillo McGrath M; Araujo-Monsalvo VM; Murayama N; Martínez-Cruz M; Justus-Doczi R; Domínguez-Hernández VM; Ondarza-Rovira R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Oct; 154(4):469-476. PubMed ID: 30268257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effective en-masse retraction design with orthodontic mini-implant anchorage: a finite element analysis.
Sung SJ; Jang GW; Chun YS; Moon YS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 20451784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Numeric simulations of en-masse space closure with sliding mechanics.
Kojima Y; Fukui H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):702.e1-6; discussion 702-4. PubMed ID: 21130318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maxillary posterior intrusion mechanics with mini-implant anchorage evaluated with the finite element method.
Çifter M; Saraç M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):e233-41. PubMed ID: 22051501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maxillary anterior en masse retraction using different antero-posterior position of mini screw: a 3D finite element study.
Hedayati Z; Shomali M
Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):31. PubMed ID: 27667816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of Mandibular Canine Intrusion Obtained Using Cantilever Versus Bone Anchorage: A Comparative Finite Element Study.
Waremani AS; Ahmed N
Cureus; 2022 Aug; 14(8):e27548. PubMed ID: 36059316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional modeling and finite element analysis in treatment planning for orthodontic tooth movement.
Ammar HH; Ngan P; Crout RJ; Mucino VH; Mukdadi OM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):e59-71. PubMed ID: 21195258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical effects of corticotomy approaches on dentoalveolar structures during canine retraction: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Yang C; Wang C; Deng F; Fan Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):457-65. PubMed ID: 26321344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finite element analysis of the effect of force directions on tooth movement in extraction space closure with miniscrew sliding mechanics.
Kojima Y; Kawamura J; Fukui H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Oct; 142(4):501-8. PubMed ID: 22999674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimum conditions for parallel translation of maxillary anterior teeth under retraction force determined with the finite element method.
Kim T; Suh J; Kim N; Lee M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):639-47. PubMed ID: 20451783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative evaluation of different compensating curves in the lingual and labial techniques using 3D FEM.
Sung SJ; Baik HS; Moon YS; Yu HS; Cho YS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Apr; 123(4):441-50. PubMed ID: 12695772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Initial effect of multiloop edgewise archwire on the mandibular dentition in Class III malocclusion subjects. A three-dimensional finite element study.
Baek SH; Shin SJ; Ahn SJ; Chang YI
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 18276927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimal loading conditions for controlled movement of anterior teeth in sliding mechanics.
Tominaga JY; Tanaka M; Koga Y; Gonzales C; Kobayashi M; Yoshida N
Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1102-7. PubMed ID: 19852600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of Skeletally Supported Anterior en Masse Retraction with Varied Lever Arm Lengths and Locations in Lingual Orthodontic Treatment: A 3D Finite Element Study.
Ghannam M; Kamiloğlu B
Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():9975428. PubMed ID: 34056005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Duration and anchorage management of canine retraction with bodily versus tipping mechanics.
Shpack N; Davidovitch M; Sarne O; Panayi N; Vardimon AD
Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 18193953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A clinical evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants as intraoral anchorage for the intrusion of maxillary anterior teeth.
Saxena R; Kumar PS; Upadhyay M; Naik V
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 21491000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extruded upper first molar intrusion: Comparison between unilateral and bilateral miniscrew anchorage.
Sugii MM; Barreto BCF; Francisco Vieira-Júnior W; Simone KRI; Bacchi A; Caldas RA
Dental Press J Orthod; 2018 Jan; 23(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 29791686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3D FEM comparison of lingual and labial orthodontics in en masse retraction.
Lombardo L; Scuzzo G; Arreghini A; Gorgun O; Ortan YO; Siciliani G
Prog Orthod; 2014 May; 15(1):38. PubMed ID: 24950350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biology of biomechanics: Finite element analysis of a statically determinate system to rotate the occlusal plane for correction of a skeletal Class III open-bite malocclusion.
Roberts WE; Viecilli RF; Chang C; Katona TR; Paydar NH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Dec; 148(6):943-55. PubMed ID: 26672700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
