These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2603859)
21. Abortion counseling: to benefit maternal health. Steinberg TN Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(4):483-517. PubMed ID: 2699161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Beyond abortion: the potential reach of a human life amendment. Westfall D Am J Law Med; 1982; 8(2):97-135. PubMed ID: 7148834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Pro-choice: a new militancy. Davis SE Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(6):32-3. PubMed ID: 2606658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Will Webster redefine Roe v. Wade? The Supreme Court could use a Missouri case to begin limiting abortion rights. Chopko ME Health Prog; 1989 Jun; 70(5):58-64. PubMed ID: 10293331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. International dimensions of the Department of Justice arguments in the Webster case. Cook RJ Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):384-94. PubMed ID: 2628654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The fight over Roe v. Wade: the Webster briefs. Fam Plann Perspect; 1989; 21(3):134-6. PubMed ID: 2759219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Legal abortion: the impending obsolescence of the trimester framework. Mangel CP Am J Law Med; 1988; 14(1):69-108. PubMed ID: 3068986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A closer look. Conner SL Ala Med; 1990; 60(1-2):4. PubMed ID: 2239628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes. Gallagher A St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Roe v. Wade. Revisiting the fundamentals. Benshoof J Conscience; 1998; 18(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 12178876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The abortion debate: can this chronic public illness be cured? Callahan D Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Dec; 35(4):783-91. PubMed ID: 1451361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Ethical issues in U.S. family planning policy. Benshoof J Draper Fund Rep; 1983 Aug; (12):11-2. PubMed ID: 12338973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Court edges away from Roe v. Wade. Fam Plann Perspect; 1989; 21(4):184-7. PubMed ID: 2792338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Rewriting Roe v. Wade. Regan DH Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1569-646. PubMed ID: 10245966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The abortion battle: the Canadian scene. Sachdev P Med Law; 1994; 13(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 8065237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. How technology is reframing the abortion debate. Callahan D Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 3514547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Roe v. Wade and the history of abortion regulation. Linton PB Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):227-33. PubMed ID: 2690604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right? Barber RA Am Crim Law Rev; 1981; 18(4):591-615. PubMed ID: 11655468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]