218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2603867)
1. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court. Conclusion: the future of abortion as a "private choice".
Grant ER
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):233-43. PubMed ID: 2603867
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court. Introduction: did the amici effort make a difference?
Kolbert K
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):153-68. PubMed ID: 2603857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellants.
Blaustein AP
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):204-33. PubMed ID: 11644397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Four-one-four.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(5):27-9. PubMed ID: 2793440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pro-choice: a new militancy.
Davis SE
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(6):32-3. PubMed ID: 2606658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Casey and its impact on abortion regulation.
Moses MF
Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):805-15. PubMed ID: 16700123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
Van Detta JA
South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision.
Kendall CC
John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):753-70. PubMed ID: 16622962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion counseling: to benefit maternal health.
Steinberg TN
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(4):483-517. PubMed ID: 2699161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Court and Webster: ethics, politics, and abortion--a panel discussion.
Gomez CF; Howard AE; Pinkerton J; Childress JF
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1990; 53(4):26-30. PubMed ID: 2247520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion and legal process in the United States: an overview of the post-Webster legal landscape.
Baron CH
Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 2628652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Webster and women's equality.
Johnsen D; Wilder MJ
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):178-84. PubMed ID: 2603859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart.
Borgmann CE
Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Unraveling compromise.
Olsen F
Harv Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 103(1):105-35. PubMed ID: 11655993
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States.
Weitz TA; Yanow S
Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The summer of our discontent.
O'Connor J
Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(5):28-9. PubMed ID: 1428832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marital secrets. The emerging issue of abortion spousal notification laws.
Shore BD
J Leg Med; 1982 Sep; 3(3):461-82. PubMed ID: 6983551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion law today.
Field MA
J Leg Med; 1993 Mar; 14(1):3-24. PubMed ID: 8463750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Casey and the resuscitation of Roe v. Wade.
Robertson JA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(5):24-8. PubMed ID: 1428831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Webster and the fundamental right to make medical decisions.
Orentlicher D
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):184-8. PubMed ID: 2603860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
