These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2603868)
1. The incompetent developmentally disabled person's right of self-determination: right-to-die, sterilization and institutionalization. Krais WA Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):333-61. PubMed ID: 2603868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Substituted judgment in medical decision making for incompetent persons: In re Storar. Williams SE Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(6):1173-98. PubMed ID: 11651834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Foregoing life-sustaining treatment for adult, developmentally disabled, public wards: a proposed statute. McKnight DK; Bellis M Am J Law Med; 1992; 18(3):203-32. PubMed ID: 1283812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Termination of life-sustaining medical treatment: who should exercise a patient's right to die? Denbo SM Health Care Superv; 1994 Jun; 12(4):60-72. PubMed ID: 10134143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Litigating life and death. Rhoden NK Harv Law Rev; 1988 Dec; 102(2):375-446. PubMed ID: 10294608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is "substituted judgment" a valid legal concept? Robertson ED Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(2):197-214. PubMed ID: 2621091 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Is "substituted judgment" a valid legal concept? Liacos PJ Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(2):215-24. PubMed ID: 2621092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Physician-assisted suicide and the right to die with assistance. Harv Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 105(8):2021-40. PubMed ID: 10119163 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Deciding right-to-die cases involving incompetent patients: Jones v. Saikewicz. Schultz S; Swartz W; Appelbaum JC Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):936-58. PubMed ID: 11664848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The right to die. Powell JA; Cohen AS Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(2):169-82. PubMed ID: 7960664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Equality for the elderly incompetent: a proposal for dignified death. Merritt TL Stanford Law Rev; 1987 Feb; 39(3):689-736. PubMed ID: 10281165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Precatory prediction and mindless mimicry: the case of Mary O'Connor. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1988 Dec; 18(6):31-3. PubMed ID: 3147972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Refusing life-sustaining treatment for incompetent patients: mere existence or a quality life? Cerminara KL Med Trial Tech Q; 1988; 35(2):121-45. PubMed ID: 11652537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The living will: does it protect the rights of the terminally ill? Rizzo RF N Y State J Med; 1989 Feb; 89(2):72-9. PubMed ID: 2710437 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Advance directives and the persistent vegetative state in Victoria: a human rights perspective. Porter D J Law Med; 2005 Nov; 13(2):256-70. PubMed ID: 16304765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Courts, gender and "the right to die". Miles SH; August A Law Med Health Care; 1990; 18(1-2):85-95. PubMed ID: 2374456 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evolving Delaware law on the termination of life-sustaining treatment. Hayman S Del Med J; 1987 Mar; 59(3):205-8, 213-4. PubMed ID: 3569614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Court's role in decisionmaking involving incompetent refusals of life-sustaining care and psychiatric medications. Parry JW Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1990; 14(6):468-76. PubMed ID: 11659325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. "Right to die" cases: a model for judicial decision-making? Webster WL N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1990; 7(2):140-56. PubMed ID: 11652592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]