287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26038683)
1. Audience-response systems for evaluation of pediatric lectures--comparison with a classic end-of-term online-based evaluation.
Bode SF; Straub C; Giesler M; Biller S; Forster J; Krüger M
GMS Z Med Ausbild; 2015; 32(2):Doc18. PubMed ID: 26038683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Student-perceived exam difficulty may trump the effects of different quality improvement measures regarding the students' evaluation of a pediatric lecture series.
Spehl MS; Straub C; Heinzmann A; Bode SFN
BMC Med Educ; 2019 Jun; 19(1):206. PubMed ID: 31196082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of written standardized feedback on the structure and quality of surgical lectures: A prospective cohort study.
Sterz J; Höfer SH; Bender B; Janko M; Adili F; Ruesseler M
BMC Med Educ; 2016 Nov; 16(1):292. PubMed ID: 27842580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do questions help? The impact of audience response systems on medical student learning: a randomised controlled trial.
Mains TE; Cofrancesco J; Milner SM; Shah NG; Goldberg H
Postgrad Med J; 2015 Jul; 91(1077):361-7. PubMed ID: 26045510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Audience response systems in medical student education benefit learners and presenters.
Nayak L; Erinjeri JP
Acad Radiol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 18348839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The audience response system and knowledge gain: a prospective study.
Tregonning AM; Doherty DA; Hornbuckle J; Dickinson JE
Med Teach; 2012; 34(4):e269-74. PubMed ID: 22455719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of differing Audience Response System question types on student attention in the veterinary medical classroom.
Rush BR; Hafen M; Biller DS; Davis EG; Klimek JA; Kukanich B; Larson RL; Roush JK; Schermerhorn T; Wilkerson MJ; White BJ
J Vet Med Educ; 2010; 37(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 20576903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A disaster medicine curriculum for medical students.
Kaji AH; Coates W; Fung CC
Teach Learn Med; 2010 Apr; 22(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 20614377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Students' evaluation of online course materials in fixed prosthodontics: a case study.
Pilcher ES
Eur J Dent Educ; 2001 May; 5(2):53-9. PubMed ID: 11683214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a web-based asynchronous pediatric emergency medicine learning tool for residents and medical students.
Burnette K; Ramundo M; Stevenson M; Beeson MS
Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Dec; 16 Suppl 2():S46-50. PubMed ID: 20053211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electronic voting to encourage interactive lectures: a randomised trial.
Duggan PM; Palmer E; Devitt P
BMC Med Educ; 2007 Jul; 7():25. PubMed ID: 17655773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An audience response system may influence student performance on anatomy examination questions.
Hoyt A; McNulty JA; Gruener G; Chandrasekhar A; Espiritu B; Ensminger D; Price R; Naheedy R
Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(6):295-9. PubMed ID: 20890951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A system for students' evaluation of lectures in the medical programme in Oslo.
Stokke S; Solberg IL; Grøttum P; Lundin KEA; Heggen KM; Breivik J
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2019 Aug; 139(11):. PubMed ID: 31429231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of Audience Response System in Enhancing Teaching of Anatomy and Physiology for Health Sciences Students at King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences.
Baashar A; Kumar RS; Akhtar SMI; Alyousif SM; Alhassan AI; Townsi N
Adv Med Educ Pract; 2023; 14():421-432. PubMed ID: 37139014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized trial comparing digital and live lecture formats [ISRCTN40455708.
Solomon DJ; Ferenchick GS; Laird-Fick HS; Kavanaugh K
BMC Med Educ; 2004 Nov; 4():27. PubMed ID: 15569389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of an audience response system during peer teaching among physical therapy students in human gross anatomy: perceptions of peer teachers and students.
Wait KR; Cloud BA; Forster LA; Jones TM; Nokleby JJ; Wolfe CR; Youdas JW
Anat Sci Educ; 2009; 2(6):286-93. PubMed ID: 19764082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An audience response system strategy to improve student motivation, attention, and feedback.
Cain J; Black EP; Rohr J
Am J Pharm Educ; 2009 Apr; 73(2):21. PubMed ID: 19513159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using an audience response system (ARS) in a face-to-face and distance education CPT/HCPCS coding course.
Harris ST; Zeng X
Perspect Health Inf Manag; 2010 Jan; 7(Winter):1f. PubMed ID: 20697463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Phone-based audience response system as an adjunct in orthodontic teaching of undergraduate dental students: a cross-over randomised controlled trial.
Alharbi F; Alazmi KF; El Momani BR; Al-Muzian L; Wertheimer M; Almukhtar A; Almuzian M
BMC Med Educ; 2020 Nov; 20(1):435. PubMed ID: 33198761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Ophthalmology lectures from the students' point of view].
Wilhelm H
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2013 Dec; 230(12):1247-50. PubMed ID: 24327287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
