These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26039440)

  • 21. Tracking publication outcomes of National Institutes of Health grants.
    Druss BG; Marcus SC
    Am J Med; 2005 Jun; 118(6):658-63. PubMed ID: 15922698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Is the h-index predictive of greater NIH funding success among academic radiologists?
    Rezek I; McDonald RJ; Kallmes DF
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Nov; 18(11):1337-40. PubMed ID: 21873082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Coauthor Country Affiliations in International Collaborative Research Funded by the US National Institutes of Health, 2009 to 2017.
    Grubbs JC; Glass RI; Kilmarx PH
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Nov; 2(11):e1915989. PubMed ID: 31755947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Percentile ranking and citation impact of a large cohort of National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-funded cardiovascular R01 grants.
    Danthi N; Wu CO; Shi P; Lauer M
    Circ Res; 2014 Feb; 114(4):600-6. PubMed ID: 24406983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Use of Bibliometric Analysis to Assess the Scientific Productivity and Impact of the Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System Program, 2006-2012.
    Reaves EJ; Valle R; Chandrasekera RM; Soto G; Burke RL; Cummings JF; Bausch DG; Kasper MR
    Mil Med; 2017 May; 182(5):e1749-e1756. PubMed ID: 29087920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A statistical model validating triage for the peer review process: keeping the competitive applications in the review pipeline.
    Vener KJ; Feuer EJ; Gorelic L
    FASEB J; 1993 Nov; 7(14):1312-9. PubMed ID: 8224604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reviewing Peer Review at the NIH.
    Lauer MS; Nakamura R
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Nov; 373(20):1893-5. PubMed ID: 26559568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Associations of topic-specific peer review outcomes and institute and center award rates with funding disparities at the National Institutes of Health.
    Lauer MS; Doyle J; Wang J; Roychowdhury D
    Elife; 2021 Apr; 10():. PubMed ID: 33847562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. NIH Funding, Research Productivity, and Scientific Impact: a 20-Year Study.
    Agarwal R; Tu W
    J Gen Intern Med; 2022 Jan; 37(1):104-109. PubMed ID: 33655385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Predicting Productivity Returns on Investment: Thirty Years of Peer Review, Grant Funding, and Publication of Highly Cited Papers at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
    Lauer MS; Danthi NS; Kaltman J; Wu C
    Circ Res; 2015 Jul; 117(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 26089369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Research funding. Big names or big ideas: do peer-review panels select the best science proposals?
    Li D; Agha L
    Science; 2015 Apr; 348(6233):434-8. PubMed ID: 25908820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Commentary: new guidelines for NIH peer review: improving the system or undermining it?
    Spiegel AM
    Acad Med; 2010 May; 85(5):746-8. PubMed ID: 20520019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Do funding applications where peer reviewers disagree have higher citations? A cross-sectional study.
    Barnett AG; Glisson SR; Gallo S
    F1000Res; 2018; 7():1030. PubMed ID: 30345025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Current Status of National Institutes of Health Research Funding for Women Surgeon-Scientists.
    Saif A; Demblowski LA; Blakely AM; Zeiger MA
    JAMA Surg; 2022 Dec; 157(12):1134-1140. PubMed ID: 36260312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Do AAO-HNSF CORE Grants Predict Future NIH Funding Success?
    Eloy JA; Svider PF; Kanumuri VV; Folbe AJ; Setzen M; Baredes S
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Aug; 151(2):246-52. PubMed ID: 24847049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Urology peer review at the National Institutes of Health.
    Olsson CA; Kennedy WA
    J Urol; 1995 Nov; 154(5):1866-9. PubMed ID: 7563369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Race, ethnicity, and NIH research awards.
    Ginther DK; Schaffer WT; Schnell J; Masimore B; Liu F; Haak LL; Kington R
    Science; 2011 Aug; 333(6045):1015-9. PubMed ID: 21852498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Is NIH funding predictive of greater research productivity and impact among academic otolaryngologists?
    Svider PF; Mauro KM; Sanghvi S; Setzen M; Baredes S; Eloy JA
    Laryngoscope; 2013 Jan; 123(1):118-22. PubMed ID: 22991270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Are Female Applicants Disadvantaged in National Institutes of Health Peer Review? Combining Algorithmic Text Mining and Qualitative Methods to Detect Evaluative Differences in R01 Reviewers' Critiques.
    Magua W; Zhu X; Bhattacharya A; Filut A; Potvien A; Leatherberry R; Lee YG; Jens M; Malikireddy D; Carnes M; Kaatz A
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2017 May; 26(5):560-570. PubMed ID: 28281870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Recent trends in National Institutes of Health funding of surgical research.
    Rangel SJ; Efron B; Moss RL
    Ann Surg; 2002 Sep; 236(3):277-86; discussion 286-7. PubMed ID: 12192314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.