These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26039686)

  • 1. Electrical impedance tomography of electrolysis.
    Meir A; Rubinsky B
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0126332. PubMed ID: 26039686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic resonance imaging of electrolysis.
    Meir A; Hjouj M; Rubinsky L; Rubinsky B
    Sci Rep; 2015 Feb; 5():8095. PubMed ID: 25659942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feature-space assessment of electrical impedance tomography coregistered with computed tomography in detecting multiple contrast targets.
    Krishnan K; Liu J; Kohli K
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061903. PubMed ID: 24877814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tissue spectroscopy with electrical impedance tomography: computer simulations.
    Griffiths H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Sep; 42(9):948-54. PubMed ID: 7558071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of thoracic vascular structures by electrical impedance tomography: a systematic assessment of prominence peak analysis of impedance changes.
    Wodack KH; Buehler S; Nishimoto SA; Graessler MF; Behem CR; Waldmann AD; Mueller B; Böhm SH; Kaniusas E; Thürk F; Maerz A; Trepte CJC; Reuter DA
    Physiol Meas; 2018 Feb; 39(2):024002. PubMed ID: 29350189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cryoelectrolysis-electrolytic processes in a frozen physiological saline medium.
    Lugnani F; Macchioro M; Rubinsky B
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e2810. PubMed ID: 28123904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation and real-time monitoring of data quality in electrical impedance tomography.
    Mamatjan Y; Grychtol B; Gaggero P; Justiz J; Koch VM; Adler A
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Nov; 32(11):1997-2005. PubMed ID: 23799682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distributed network imaging and electrical impedance tomography of minimally invasive surgery.
    Otten DM; Onik G; Rubinsky B
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Apr; 3(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 15059018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MR Imaging Enables Real-Time Monitoring of In Vitro Electrolytic Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Stein EJ; Perkons NR; Wildenberg JC; Iyer SK; Hunt SJ; Nadolski GJ; Witschey WR; Gade TP
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2020 Feb; 31(2):352-361. PubMed ID: 31748127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Non-invasive imaging of ion concentration distribution around cell spheroids by electrical impedance tomographic sensor printed on circuit board under temporal compensation by ion transport impedance model.
    Kawashima D; Yuki T; Li S; Takei M
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2022 Sep; 212():114432. PubMed ID: 35671699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Toward Electrical Impedance Tomography Coupled Ultrasound Imaging for Assessing Muscle Health.
    Murphy EK; Skinner J; Martucci M; Rutkove SB; Halter RJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2019 Jun; 38(6):1409-1419. PubMed ID: 30530320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of polyacrylamide gels in a saline-filled tank to determine the linearity of the Sheffield Mark 1 electrical impedance tomography (EIT) system in measuring impedance disturbances.
    Holder DS; Khan A
    Physiol Meas; 1994 May; 15 Suppl 2a():A45-50. PubMed ID: 8087049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Choice of reconstructed tissue properties affects interpretation of lung EIT images.
    Grychtol B; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Jun; 35(6):1035-50. PubMed ID: 24844670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-invasive imaging of neural activity with magnetic detection electrical impedance tomography (MDEIT): a modelling study.
    Mason K; Aristovich K; Holder D
    Physiol Meas; 2023 Nov; 44(11):. PubMed ID: 37832564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of applied and induced current electrical impedance tomography.
    Tanguay LF; Gagnon H; Guardo R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Sep; 54(9):1643-9. PubMed ID: 17867356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Capacitively Coupled Electrical Impedance Tomography for Brain Imaging.
    Jiang YD; Soleimani M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2019 Sep; 38(9):2104-2113. PubMed ID: 30703015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual thorax geometry reduces position and size differences in reconstructed images of electrical impedance tomography.
    Zhao Z; Frerichs I; Pulletz S; Müller-Lisse U; Möller K
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2014; 22(6):797-807. PubMed ID: 25408396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CT Image-Guided Electrical Impedance Tomography for Medical Imaging.
    Li Z; Zhang J; Liu D; Du J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2020 Jun; 39(6):1822-1832. PubMed ID: 31831409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrical impedance tomography.
    Kotre CJ
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Nov; 70 Spec No():S200-5. PubMed ID: 9534735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of EIT system performance.
    Yasin M; Böhm S; Gaggero PO; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Jul; 32(7):851-65. PubMed ID: 21646713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.