These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26040541)

  • 1. Student perceptions of independent versus facilitated small group learning approaches to compressed medical anatomy education.
    Whelan A; Leddy JJ; Mindra S; Matthew Hughes JD; El-Bialy S; Ramnanan CJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016; 9(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 26040541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Musculoskeletal Anatomy Education: Evaluating the Influence of Different Teaching and Learning Activities on Medical Students Perception and Academic Performance.
    Peeler J; Bergen H; Bulow A
    Ann Anat; 2018 Sep; 219():44-50. PubMed ID: 29886123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Benefits of extracurricular participation in dissection in a prosection-based medical anatomy program.
    Whelan A; Leddy JJ; Ramnanan CJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2018 May; 11(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 28881412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anatomy in medical education: perceptions of undergraduate medical students.
    Chapman SJ; Hakeem AR; Marangoni G; Prasad KR
    Ann Anat; 2013 Oct; 195(5):409-14. PubMed ID: 23706695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Team-based learning in the gross anatomy laboratory improves academic performance and students' attitudes toward teamwork.
    Huitt TW; Killins A; Brooks WS
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24799448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dissection versus Prosection: A Comparative Assessment of the Course Experiences, Approaches to Learning, and Academic Performance of Non-medical Undergraduate Students in Human Anatomy.
    McWatt SC; Newton GS; Umphrey GJ; Jadeski LC
    Anat Sci Educ; 2021 Mar; 14(2):184-200. PubMed ID: 32539226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A survey of student perceptions of team-based learning in anatomy curriculum: favorable views unrelated to grades.
    Vasan NS; DeFouw DO; Compton S
    Anat Sci Educ; 2009; 2(4):150-5. PubMed ID: 19572279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of self-learning modules to facilitate learning of basic science concepts in an integrated medical curriculum.
    Khalil MK; Nelson LD; Kibble JD
    Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(5):219-26. PubMed ID: 20814914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anatomy learning from prosected cadaveric specimens versus three-dimensional software: A comparative study of upper limb anatomy.
    Mitrousias V; Varitimidis SE; Hantes ME; Malizos KN; Arvanitis DL; Zibis AH
    Ann Anat; 2018 Jul; 218():156-164. PubMed ID: 29669259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Undergraduate perspectives on the teaching and learning of anatomy.
    Mitchell R; Batty L
    ANZ J Surg; 2009 Mar; 79(3):118-21. PubMed ID: 19317774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing knowledge of human gross anatomy in medical school: an applied contextual-learning theory method.
    Clough RW; Lehr RP
    Clin Anat; 1996; 9(4):263-8. PubMed ID: 8793222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human anatomy: let the students tell us how to teach.
    Davis CR; Bates AS; Ellis H; Roberts AM
    Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(4):262-72. PubMed ID: 24249485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating the use of quick response codes in the gross anatomy laboratory.
    Traser CJ; Hoffman LA; Seifert MF; Wilson AB
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 25288343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Near-peer teaching in an anatomy course with a low faculty-to-student ratio.
    Durán CE; Bahena EN; Rodríguez Mde L; Baca GJ; Uresti AS; Elizondo-Omaña RE; López SG
    Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 22383124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors influencing students' decisions to participate in a short "dissection experience" within a systemic anatomy course.
    Larkin TA; McAndrew DJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(4):225-31. PubMed ID: 23213067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mixed methods student evaluation of an online systemic human anatomy course with laboratory.
    Attardi SM; Choi S; Barnett J; Rogers KA
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 May; 9(3):272-85. PubMed ID: 26588051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flipped spotters learning model: An innovative student activity-based strategy. A preparation tool for anatomy practical examinations in medical education.
    Łopińska M; Gielecki JS; Żurada A
    Anat Sci Educ; 2022 Aug; 15(5):886-897. PubMed ID: 34398534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The ATLAS project: The effects of a constructionist digital laboratory project on undergraduate laboratory performance.
    Shoepe TC; Cavedon DK; Derian JM; Levy CS; Morales A
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 24678042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Applying anatomy to something I care about": Authentic inquiry learning and student experiences of an inquiry project.
    Anstey LM
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Nov; 10(6):538-548. PubMed ID: 28376275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Independent learning modules enhance student performance and understanding of anatomy.
    Serrat MA; Dom AM; Buchanan JT; Williams AR; Efaw ML; Richardson LL
    Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(5):406-16. PubMed ID: 24616425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.