These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26040858)

  • 1. Misplaced faith.
    Nature; 2015 Jun; 522(7554):6. PubMed ID: 26040858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trust and how to sustain it.
    Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):719. PubMed ID: 12490891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Don't rush to rehabilitate Hwang.
    Nature; 2014 Jan; 505(7484):453. PubMed ID: 24459716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The time is right to confront misconduct.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2012 Aug; 488(7409):7. PubMed ID: 22859166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Agency for change.
    Nature; 2014 May; 509(7498):8. PubMed ID: 24784180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Science publishing: The trouble with retractions.
    Van Noorden R
    Nature; 2011 Oct; 478(7367):26-8. PubMed ID: 21979026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Openness in science is key to keeping public trust.
    Yarborough M
    Nature; 2014 Nov; 515(7527):313. PubMed ID: 25409791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stop ignoring misconduct.
    Kornfeld DS; Titus SL
    Nature; 2016 Sep; 537(7618):29-30. PubMed ID: 27582206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Redefine misconduct as distorted reporting.
    Fanelli D
    Nature; 2013 Feb; 494(7436):149. PubMed ID: 23407504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Publish or perish in China.
    Qiu J
    Nature; 2010 Jan; 463(7278):142-3. PubMed ID: 20075887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Research: Uncovering misconduct.
    Gewin V
    Nature; 2012 May; 485(7396):137-9. PubMed ID: 22563582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Misconduct is the main cause of life-sciences retractions.
    Corbyn Z
    Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7418):21. PubMed ID: 23038445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Give every paper a read for reproducibility.
    Winchester C
    Nature; 2018 May; 557(7705):281. PubMed ID: 29769684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A painful remedy.
    Nature; 2010 Nov; 468(7320):6. PubMed ID: 21048718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fake peer-review in research publication: revisiting research purpose and academic integrity.
    Hadi MA
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2016 Oct; 24(5):309-10. PubMed ID: 27623702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How can scientists make the most of the public's trust in them?
    Nature; 2024 Feb; 626(7997):8. PubMed ID: 38297178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retracted gay-marriage study debated at misconduct meet-up.
    Van Noorden R
    Nature; 2015 Jun; 522(7554):14-5. PubMed ID: 26040873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dubious data remain in print two years after misconduct inquiry.
    Abbott A; Schwarz J
    Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6894):113. PubMed ID: 12110849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retraction record rocks community.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7416):346-7. PubMed ID: 22996524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomedical paper retractions have quadrupled in 20 years - why?
    Else H
    Nature; 2024 Jun; 630(8016):280-281. PubMed ID: 38822109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.