209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26040858)
1. Misplaced faith.
Nature; 2015 Jun; 522(7554):6. PubMed ID: 26040858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Trust and how to sustain it.
Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):719. PubMed ID: 12490891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Don't rush to rehabilitate Hwang.
Nature; 2014 Jan; 505(7484):453. PubMed ID: 24459716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The time is right to confront misconduct.
Macilwain C
Nature; 2012 Aug; 488(7409):7. PubMed ID: 22859166
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Agency for change.
Nature; 2014 May; 509(7498):8. PubMed ID: 24784180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Science publishing: The trouble with retractions.
Van Noorden R
Nature; 2011 Oct; 478(7367):26-8. PubMed ID: 21979026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Openness in science is key to keeping public trust.
Yarborough M
Nature; 2014 Nov; 515(7527):313. PubMed ID: 25409791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Stop ignoring misconduct.
Kornfeld DS; Titus SL
Nature; 2016 Sep; 537(7618):29-30. PubMed ID: 27582206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Redefine misconduct as distorted reporting.
Fanelli D
Nature; 2013 Feb; 494(7436):149. PubMed ID: 23407504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Publish or perish in China.
Qiu J
Nature; 2010 Jan; 463(7278):142-3. PubMed ID: 20075887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Research: Uncovering misconduct.
Gewin V
Nature; 2012 May; 485(7396):137-9. PubMed ID: 22563582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Misconduct is the main cause of life-sciences retractions.
Corbyn Z
Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7418):21. PubMed ID: 23038445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Give every paper a read for reproducibility.
Winchester C
Nature; 2018 May; 557(7705):281. PubMed ID: 29769684
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A painful remedy.
Nature; 2010 Nov; 468(7320):6. PubMed ID: 21048718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fake peer-review in research publication: revisiting research purpose and academic integrity.
Hadi MA
Int J Pharm Pract; 2016 Oct; 24(5):309-10. PubMed ID: 27623702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. How can scientists make the most of the public's trust in them?
Nature; 2024 Feb; 626(7997):8. PubMed ID: 38297178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Retracted gay-marriage study debated at misconduct meet-up.
Van Noorden R
Nature; 2015 Jun; 522(7554):14-5. PubMed ID: 26040873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Dubious data remain in print two years after misconduct inquiry.
Abbott A; Schwarz J
Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6894):113. PubMed ID: 12110849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Retraction record rocks community.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7416):346-7. PubMed ID: 22996524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomedical paper retractions have quadrupled in 20 years - why?
Else H
Nature; 2024 Jun; 630(8016):280-281. PubMed ID: 38822109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
