These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26041554)

  • 21. fMRI-Guided transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals that the superior temporal sulcus is a cortical locus of the McGurk effect.
    Beauchamp MS; Nath AR; Pasalar S
    J Neurosci; 2010 Feb; 30(7):2414-7. PubMed ID: 20164324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Audiovisual sentence recognition not predicted by susceptibility to the McGurk effect.
    Van Engen KJ; Xie Z; Chandrasekaran B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):396-403. PubMed ID: 27921268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Timing in audiovisual speech perception: A mini review and new psychophysical data.
    Venezia JH; Thurman SM; Matchin W; George SE; Hickok G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Feb; 78(2):583-601. PubMed ID: 26669309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Investigation of Cross-Language and Stimulus-Dependent Effects on the McGurk Effect with Finnish and Japanese Speakers and Listeners.
    Tiippana K; Ujiie Y; Peromaa T; Takahashi K
    Brain Sci; 2023 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 37626554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Early and late beta-band power reflect audiovisual perception in the McGurk illusion.
    Roa Romero Y; Senkowski D; Keil J
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 113(7):2342-50. PubMed ID: 25568160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Neural correlates of interindividual differences in children's audiovisual speech perception.
    Nath AR; Fava EE; Beauchamp MS
    J Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 31(39):13963-71. PubMed ID: 21957257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual influences on perception of speech and nonspeech vocal-tract events.
    Brancazio L; Best CT; Fowler CA
    Lang Speech; 2006; 49(Pt 1):21-53. PubMed ID: 16922061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Seeing and hearing others and oneself talk.
    Sams M; Möttönen R; Sihvonen T
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 May; 23(2-3):429-35. PubMed ID: 15820649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of invisible lip movements on phonetic perception.
    Teramoto W; Ernst MO
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6478. PubMed ID: 37081084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A value-driven McGurk effect: Value-associated faces enhance the influence of visual information on audiovisual speech perception and its eye movement pattern.
    Luo X; Kang G; Guo Y; Yu X; Zhou X
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1928-1941. PubMed ID: 31898072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Audiovisual speech perception: Moving beyond McGurk.
    Van Engen KJ; Dey A; Sommers MS; Peelle JE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Dec; 152(6):3216. PubMed ID: 36586857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The development of audiovisual speech perception in Mandarin-speaking children: Evidence from the McGurk paradigm.
    Weng Y; Rong Y; Peng G
    Child Dev; 2024; 95(3):750-765. PubMed ID: 37843038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Audiovisual speech perception in children with developmental language disorder in degraded listening conditions.
    Meronen A; Tiippana K; Westerholm J; Ahonen T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 56(1):211-21. PubMed ID: 22653918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of language experience and expectations on attention to consonants and tones in English and Mandarin Chinese.
    Lin M; Francis AL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Nov; 136(5):2827-38. PubMed ID: 25373982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Binding and unbinding the auditory and visual streams in the McGurk effect.
    Nahorna O; Berthommier F; Schwartz JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1061-77. PubMed ID: 22894226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cross-modal phonetic encoding facilitates the McGurk illusion and phonemic restoration.
    Abbott NT; Shahin AJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2018 Dec; 120(6):2988-3000. PubMed ID: 30303762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hyperarticulation of vowels enhances phonetic change responses in both native and non-native speakers of English: evidence from an auditory event-related potential study.
    Uther M; Giannakopoulou A; Iverson P
    Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 1470():52-8. PubMed ID: 22771705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Perception of audiovisual speech synchrony for native and non-native language.
    Navarra J; Alsius A; Velasco I; Soto-Faraco S; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1323():84-93. PubMed ID: 20117103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cross-language differences in informational masking of speech by speech: English versus Mandarin Chinese.
    Wu X; Yang Z; Huang Y; Chen J; Li L; Daneman M; Schneider BA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 54(6):1506-24. PubMed ID: 22180019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Native language shapes automatic neural processing of speech.
    Intartaglia B; White-Schwoch T; Meunier C; Roman S; Kraus N; Schön D
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Aug; 89():57-65. PubMed ID: 27263123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.