357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26041717)
1. Pitfalls in reporting sample size calculation in randomized controlled trials published in leading anaesthesia journals: a systematic review.
Abdulatif M; Mukhtar A; Obayah G
Br J Anaesth; 2015 Nov; 115(5):699-707. PubMed ID: 26041717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sample size calculations for randomized clinical trials published in anesthesiology journals: a comparison of 2010 versus 2016.
Chow JTY; Turkstra TP; Yim E; Jones PM
Can J Anaesth; 2018 Jun; 65(6):611-618. PubMed ID: 29569142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The quality of the reported sample size calculations in randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed.
Lee PH; Tse ACY
Eur J Intern Med; 2017 May; 40():16-21. PubMed ID: 27769569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Negative results of randomized clinical trials published in the surgical literature: equivalency or error?
Dimick JB; Diener-West M; Lipsett PA
Arch Surg; 2001 Jul; 136(7):796-800. PubMed ID: 11448393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Discrepancies Between Randomized Controlled Trial Registry Entries and Content of Corresponding Manuscripts Reported in Anesthesiology Journals.
De Oliveira GS; Jung MJ; McCarthy RJ
Anesth Analg; 2015 Oct; 121(4):1030-1033. PubMed ID: 26378702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improvement in the quality of randomized controlled trials among general anesthesiology journals 2000 to 2006: a 6-year follow-up.
Greenfield ML; Mhyre JM; Mashour GA; Blum JM; Yen EC; Rosenberg AL
Anesth Analg; 2009 Jun; 108(6):1916-21. PubMed ID: 19448222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Registered and Reported Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials Published in Anesthesiology Journals.
Jones PM; Chow JTY; Arango MF; Fridfinnson JA; Gai N; Lam K; Turkstra TP
Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1292-1300. PubMed ID: 28704247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomized controlled trials in non-pharmacological rehabilitation research: a scoping review of the reporting of sample size calculation, randomization procedure, and statistical analyses.
Amiri M; Kumbhare D
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2020 Dec; 56(6):790-798. PubMed ID: 32935956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sample size calculation in physical medicine and rehabilitation: a systematic review of reporting, characteristics, and results in randomized controlled trials.
Abdul Latif L; Daud Amadera JE; Pimentel D; Pimentel T; Fregni F
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Feb; 92(2):306-15. PubMed ID: 21272730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reporting sample size calculations for randomized controlled trials published in nursing journals: A cross-sectional study.
Tam W; Lo K; Woo B
Int J Nurs Stud; 2020 Feb; 102():103450. PubMed ID: 31731176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving Power and Sample Size Calculation in Rehabilitation Trial Reports: A Methodological Assessment.
Castellini G; Gianola S; Bonovas S; Moja L
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2016 Jul; 97(7):1195-201. PubMed ID: 26971671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Methodological reporting quality of randomized controlled trials: A survey of seven core journals of orthopaedics from Mainland China over 5 years following the CONSORT statement.
Zhang J; Chen X; Zhu Q; Cui J; Cao L; Su J
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Nov; 102(7):933-938. PubMed ID: 27514437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reporting of Sample Size Parameters in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Prosthodontic Journals.
Dumbrigue HB; Dumbrigue EC; Dumbrigue DC; Chingbingyong MI
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):159-162. PubMed ID: 30582280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The quality of randomized controlled trials in major anesthesiology journals.
Greenfield MLVH; Rosenberg AL; O'Reilly M; Shanks AM; Sliwinski MJ; Nauss MD
Anesth Analg; 2005 Jun; 100(6):1759-1764. PubMed ID: 15920210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Type II error and statistical power in reports of small animal clinical trials.
Giuffrida MA
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2014 May; 244(9):1075-80. PubMed ID: 24739118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals.
Can OS; Yilmaz AA; Hasdogan M; Alkaya F; Turhan SC; Can MF; Alanoglu Z
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Jul; 28(7):485-92. PubMed ID: 21037480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine: a survey of 13 randomly selected journals from mainland China.
Wang G; Mao B; Xiong ZY; Fan T; Chen XD; Wang L; Liu GJ; Liu J; Guo J; Chang J; Wu TX; Li TQ;
Clin Ther; 2007 Jul; 29(7):1456-67. PubMed ID: 17825697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reporting of various methodological and statistical parameters in negative studies published in prominent Indian Medical Journals: a systematic review.
Charan J; Saxena D
J Postgrad Med; 2014; 60(4):362-5. PubMed ID: 25370542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An audit of the statistical validity of conclusions of clinical superiority in anaesthesia journals.
Gibbs NM; Weightman WM
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2014 Sep; 42(5):599-607. PubMed ID: 25233173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A systematic review of reporting in randomized controlled trials in Dermatologic Surgery: Jadad scores, power analysis, and sample size determination.
Alam M; Rauf M; Ali S; Nodzenski M; Minkis K
Dermatol Surg; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1299-305. PubMed ID: 25357168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
