684 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26041872)
1. EFFICAS II: optimization of catheter contact force improves outcome of pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Kautzner J; Neuzil P; Lambert H; Peichl P; Petru J; Cihak R; Skoda J; Wichterle D; Wissner E; Yulzari A; Kuck KH
Europace; 2015 Aug; 17(8):1229-35. PubMed ID: 26041872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of Contact Force Monitoring in Acute Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using an Anatomic Approach. A Randomized Study.
Pedrote A; Arana-Rueda E; Arce-León A; Acosta J; Gómez-Pulido F; Martos-Maine JL; Frutos-López M; Sánchez-Brotons J; García-Riesco L
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2016 Apr; 39(4):361-9. PubMed ID: 26768692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrical reconnection after pulmonary vein isolation is contingent on contact force during initial treatment: results from the EFFICAS I study.
Neuzil P; Reddy VY; Kautzner J; Petru J; Wichterle D; Shah D; Lambert H; Yulzari A; Wissner E; Kuck KH
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2013 Apr; 6(2):327-33. PubMed ID: 23515263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrophysiological findings following pulmonary vein isolation using radiofrequency catheter guided by contact-force and second-generation cryoballoon: lessons from repeat ablation procedures.
Ciconte G; Velagić V; Mugnai G; Saitoh Y; Irfan G; Hunuk B; Ströker E; Conte G; Sieira J; Di Giovanni G; Baltogiannis G; Brugada P; de Asmundis C; Chierchia GB
Europace; 2016 Jan; 18(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 26445821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-year outcomes and reconnection patterns after initial contact force guided pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Nair GM; Yeo C; MacDonald Z; Ainslie MP; Alqarawi WA; Nery PB; Redpath CJ; Sadek M; Spence S; Green MS; Birnie DH
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 Sep; 28(9):984-993. PubMed ID: 28635046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanisms of pulmonary vein reconnection after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: the deterministic role of contact force and interlesion distance.
Park CI; Lehrmann H; Keyl C; Weber R; Schiebeling J; Allgeier J; Schurr P; Shah A; Neumann FJ; Arentz T; Jadidi AS
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Jul; 25(7):701-8. PubMed ID: 24575734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Catheter-tissue contact force values do not impact mid-term clinical outcome following pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Stabile G; Solimene F; Calò L; Anselmino M; Castro A; Pratola C; Golia P; Bottoni N; Grandinetti G; De Simone A; Schillaci V; Bertaglia E; De Ponti R
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Jan; 42(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 25378035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pulmonary vein isolation using a circular, open irrigated mapping and ablation catheter (nMARQ): a report on feasibility and efficacy.
Zellerhoff S; Daly M; Lim HS; Denis A; Komatsu Y; Jesel L; Derval N; Sacher F; Cochet H; Knecht S; Yiem S; Hocini M; Haïssaguerre M; Jaïs P
Europace; 2014 Sep; 16(9):1296-303. PubMed ID: 24942401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low contact force and force-time integral predict early recovery and dormant conduction revealed by adenosine after pulmonary vein isolation.
le Polain de Waroux JB; Weerasooriya R; Anvardeen K; Barbraud C; Marchandise S; De Meester C; Goesaert C; Reis I; Scavee C
Europace; 2015 Jun; 17(6):877-83. PubMed ID: 25618742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Real-time contact force sensing for pulmonary vein isolation in the setting of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: procedural and 1-year results.
Marijon E; Fazaa S; Narayanan K; Guy-Moyat B; Bouzeman A; Providencia R; Treguer F; Combes N; Bortone A; Boveda S; Combes S; Albenque JP
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 24433324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical utility of automated ablation lesion tagging based on catheter stability information (VisiTag Module of the CARTO 3 System) with contact force-time integral during pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation.
Okumura Y; Watanabe I; Iso K; Nagashima K; Sonoda K; Sasaki N; Kogawa R; Takahashi K; Ohkubo K; Nakai T; Nakahara S; Hori Y; Hirayama A
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2016 Nov; 47(2):245-252. PubMed ID: 27278517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Higher contact-force values associated with better mid-term outcome of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation using the SmartTouch™ catheter.
Providência R; Marijon E; Combes S; Bouzeman A; Jourda F; Khoueiry Z; Cardin C; Combes N; Boveda S; Albenque JP
Europace; 2015 Jan; 17(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 25280910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of contact force-guided procedure with non-contact force-guided procedure during left atrial mapping and pulmonary vein isolation: impact of contact force on recurrence of atrial fibrillation.
Makimoto H; Heeger CH; Lin T; Rillig A; Metzner A; Wissner E; Mathew S; Deiss S; Rausch P; Lemeš C; Kuck KH; Ouyang F; Tilz RR
Clin Res Cardiol; 2015 Oct; 104(10):861-70. PubMed ID: 25893569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between radiofrequency with contact force-sensing and second-generation cryoballoon for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a multicentre European evaluation.
Squara F; Zhao A; Marijon E; Latcu DG; Providencia R; Di Giovanni G; Jauvert G; Jourda F; Chierchia GB; De Asmundis C; Ciconte G; Alonso C; Grimard C; Boveda S; Cauchemez B; Saoudi N; Brugada P; Albenque JP; Thomas O
Europace; 2015 May; 17(5):718-24. PubMed ID: 25840289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The importance of catheter stability evaluated by Visitag(TM) during pulmonary vein isolation.
Fujiwara R; Imamura K; Kijima Y; Masano T; Nagoshi R; Kohzuki A; Shibata H; Tsukiyama Y; Takeshige R; Yanaka K; Nakano S; Fukuyama Y; Shite J
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2016 Aug; 46(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 26781786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The best of two worlds? Pulmonary vein isolation using a novel radiofrequency ablation catheter incorporating contact force sensing technology and 56-hole porous tip irrigation.
Maurer T; Rottner L; Makimoto H; Reissmann B; Heeger CH; Lemes C; Fink T; Riedl J; Santoro F; Wohlmuth P; Volkmer M; Mathew S; Metzner A; Ouyang F; Kuck KH; Sohns C
Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Nov; 107(11):1003-1012. PubMed ID: 29740700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contact force facilitates the achievement of an unexcitable ablation line during pulmonary vein isolation.
Schaeffer B; Willems S; Meyer C; Lüker J; Akbulak RÖ; Moser J; Jularic M; Eickholt C; Schwarzl JM; Gunawardene M; Kuklik P; Sultan A; Hoffmann BA; Steven D
Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Aug; 107(8):632-641. PubMed ID: 29500567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single-catheter technique for pulmonary vein antrum isolation: is it sufficient to identify and close the residual gaps without a circular mapping catheter?
Dong J; Liu X; Long D; Yu R; Tang R; Lü F; Ma C
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2009 Mar; 20(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 19175841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized comparison of contact force-guided versus conventional circumferential pulmonary vein isolation of atrial fibrillation: prevalence, characteristics, and predictors of electrical reconnections and clinical outcomes.
Nakamura K; Naito S; Sasaki T; Nakano M; Minami K; Nakatani Y; Ikeda K; Yamashita E; Kumagai K; Funabashi N; Oshima S
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Dec; 44(3):235-45. PubMed ID: 26387117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Duty-cycled multi-electrode radiofrequency vs. conventional irrigated point-by-point radiofrequency ablation for recurrent atrial fibrillation: comparative 3-year data.
De Greef Y; Buysschaert I; Schwagten B; Stockman D; Tavernier R; Duytschaever M
Europace; 2014 Jun; 16(6):820-5. PubMed ID: 24443035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
