These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

22 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26043356)

  • 1. Mixture survival trees for cancer risk classification.
    Jia B; Zeng D; Liao JJZ; Liu GF; Tan X; Diao G; Ibrahim JG
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2022 Jul; 28(3):356-379. PubMed ID: 35486260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Splitting Choice and Computational Complexity Analysis of Decision Trees.
    Zhao X; Nie X
    Entropy (Basel); 2021 Sep; 23(10):. PubMed ID: 34681965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Survival Forests with R-Squared Splitting Rules.
    Wang H; Chen X; Li G
    J Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 25(4):388-395. PubMed ID: 29265882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bagging survival tree procedure for variable selection and prediction in the presence of nonsusceptible patients.
    Mbogning C; Broët P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jun; 17(1):230. PubMed ID: 27266372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of splitting methods on survival tree.
    Shimokawa A; Kawasaki Y; Miyaoka E
    Int J Biostat; 2015 May; 11(1):175-88. PubMed ID: 25849798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models.
    Bender R; Augustin T; Blettner M
    Stat Med; 2005 Jun; 24(11):1713-23. PubMed ID: 15724232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Novel head and neck cancer survival analysis approach: random survival forests versus Cox proportional hazards regression.
    Datema FR; Moya A; Krause P; Bäck T; Willmes L; Langeveld T; Baatenburg de Jong RJ; Blom HM
    Head Neck; 2012 Jan; 34(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 21322080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Personalized Risk Prediction in Clinical Oncology Research: Applications and Practical Issues Using Survival Trees and Random Forests.
    Hu C; Steingrimsson JA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(2):333-349. PubMed ID: 29048993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alternative tree-structured survival analysis based on variance of survival time.
    Jin H; Lu Y; Stone K; Black DM
    Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(6):670-80. PubMed ID: 15534347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study on splitting criteria of a survival tree based on the Cox proportional model.
    Shimokawa A; Kawasaki Y; Miyaoka E
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(2):386-401. PubMed ID: 26043356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time-dependent covariates in the Cox proportional-hazards regression model.
    Fisher LD; Lin DY
    Annu Rev Public Health; 1999; 20():145-57. PubMed ID: 10352854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survival analysis 1982-1991: the second decade of the proportional hazards regression model.
    Andersen PK
    Stat Med; 1991 Dec; 10(12):1931-41. PubMed ID: 1805319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.