202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26043468)
1. Good ideas sorely needed on OSHA's PELs.
Laws J
Occup Health Saf; 2015 May; 84(5):4. PubMed ID: 26043468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Generic strategies for protecting worker health and safety. OSHA's general duty clause and hazard communications standard.
Baram M
Occup Med; 1996; 11(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 8907052
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Threshold limit values, permissible exposure limits, and feasibility: the bases for exposure limits in the United States.
Rappaport SM
Am J Ind Med; 1993 May; 23(5):683-94. PubMed ID: 8506846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. OSHA's four inconsistent carcinogen policies.
Robinson JC; Paxman DG
Am J Public Health; 1991 Jun; 81(6):775-80. PubMed ID: 2029055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. OSHA's final rule on asbestos cuts permissible exposure in half.
Okleshen W
Health Facil Manage; 1995 Jan; 8(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 10139314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. New approach set to protect workers from asbestos exposures below PELs.
Borak J; Russi M
Occup Health Saf; 1995 Feb; 64(2):39-40. PubMed ID: 7870404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comment on "Implications of OSHA's reliance on TLVs in developing the air contaminants standard" by Robinson et al.
Saric M
Am J Ind Med; 1991; 19(6):815-7. PubMed ID: 1882859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Updating OSHA's permissible exposure limits: putting politics aside.
Paustenbach DJ
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Dec; 58(12):845-9. PubMed ID: 9425644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Assuring compliance with OSHA's hazard communication standard.
Seidlitz PR
J Healthc Mater Manage; 1991 Jun; 9(5):32, 34, 36-7. PubMed ID: 10111254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Complying with OSHA's Hazard Communication Standard.
King DL
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1994 Nov; 51(21):2646, 2649. PubMed ID: 7856575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Report on OSHA's 1994 activities in the healthcare arena.
Healthc Hazard Mater Manage; 1995 Apr; 8(7):1-6. PubMed ID: 10141992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Rationale for the method of determining the maximum allowable exposure level to hazardous industrial substances adopted in USA].
Novikov SM; Semenovykh LN
Gig Sanit; 1994 Feb; (2):25-30. PubMed ID: 8005468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Occupational exposure to hazardous chemicals in laboratories (29 CFR 1910.1450).
Kenison L
Qual Assur; 1994 Mar; 3(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 7804618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Implications of OSHA's reliance on TLVs in developing the air contaminants standard.
Robinson JC; Paxman DG; Rappaport SM
Am J Ind Med; 1991; 19(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 1989435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recommendation of occupational exposure limits (2014-2015).
Japan Society for Occupational Health
J Occup Health; 2014; 56(5):401-20. PubMed ID: 25422057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Complying with OSHA's hexavalent chromium standards.
Cole CJ
Occup Health Saf; 2007 Mar; 76(3):40, 42-4. PubMed ID: 17424956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. OSHA's stance on safety incentive programs.
Wright H; Barker M
Occup Health Saf; 2012 Sep; 81(9):16. PubMed ID: 23002514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. OSHA's New Confined Space Standard.
Irwin C; Smith J
Occup Health Saf; 2015 Jul; 84(7):72, 74-5. PubMed ID: 26281394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Chemical reaction. A look at OSHA's guidance for chemical incident first receivers.
McLaughlin S
Health Facil Manage; 2005 Apr; 18(4):36, 38, 40. PubMed ID: 15898455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Triple play.
Hamel KD
Occup Health Saf; 2011 Oct; 80(10):68, 70. PubMed ID: 22069869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
