These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26043656)

  • 1. The value of using test response data for content validity: An application of the bifactor-MIRT to a nursing knowledge test.
    Cai Y
    Nurse Educ Today; 2015 Dec; 35(12):1181-5. PubMed ID: 26043656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures.
    Reise SP; Morizot J; Hays RD
    Qual Life Res; 2007; 16 Suppl 1():19-31. PubMed ID: 17479357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does Instruction Affect the Underlying Dimensionality of a Kinesiology Test?
    Bezruczko N; Frank E; Perkins K
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(4):393-415. PubMed ID: 28009588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A bifactor model of disgust proneness: examination of the Disgust Emotion Scale.
    Olatunji BO; Ebesutani C; Reise SP
    Assessment; 2015 Apr; 22(2):248-62. PubMed ID: 25006025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the Bifactor Nominal Response Model Analysis of a Health Efficacy Measure.
    Johnson Preston KS; Han Z
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(2):209-226. PubMed ID: 28009585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chinese version of the nursing students' perception of instructor caring (C-NSPIC): assessment of reliability and validity.
    Li J; Zhou L; Zhu D; Hu C; Zhang X; Xu Y
    Nurse Educ Today; 2013 Dec; 33(12):1482-9. PubMed ID: 23790749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifying an appropriate measurement modeling approach for the Mini-Mental State Examination.
    Rubright JD; Nandakumar R; Karlawish J
    Psychol Assess; 2016 Feb; 28(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 26029945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Gratitude Resentment and Appreciation Test-Revised Short (GRAT-RS): A Multidimensional Item Response Theory Analysis in Italian Workers.
    Svicher A; Palazzeschi L; Gori A; Di Fabio A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Dec; 19(24):. PubMed ID: 36554667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rewards of bridging the divide between measurement and clinical theory: demonstration of a bifactor model for the Brief Symptom Inventory.
    Thomas ML
    Psychol Assess; 2012 Mar; 24(1):101-13. PubMed ID: 21767026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using multidimensional item response theory to evaluate how response styles impact measurement.
    Adams DJ; Bolt DM; Deng S; Smith SS; Baker TB
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Nov; 72(3):466-485. PubMed ID: 30919943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bifactor models and rotations: exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores.
    Reise SP; Moore TM; Haviland MG
    J Pers Assess; 2010 Nov; 92(6):544-59. PubMed ID: 20954056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noncompensatory MIRT For Passage-Based Tests.
    Kim N; Bolt DM; Wollack J
    Psychometrika; 2022 Sep; 87(3):992-1009. PubMed ID: 35060012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Nursing Student Self-Efficacy Scale: development using item response theory.
    Stump GS; Husman J; Brem SK
    Nurs Res; 2012; 61(3):149-58. PubMed ID: 22551989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing rumination response style among undergraduate nursing students: A construct validation study.
    Thanoi W; Klainin-Yobas P
    Nurse Educ Today; 2015 May; 35(5):641-6. PubMed ID: 25614016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bookmark locations and item response model selection in the presence of local item dependence.
    Skaggs G
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 17215566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A General Bayesian Multidimensional Item Response Theory Model for Small and Large Samples.
    Fujimoto KA; Neugebauer SR
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Aug; 80(4):665-694. PubMed ID: 32616954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Introduction to bifactor polytomous item response theory analysis.
    Toland MD; Sulis I; Giambona F; Porcu M; Campbell JM
    J Sch Psychol; 2017 Feb; 60():41-63. PubMed ID: 28164798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Comparison of the Separate and Concurrent Calibration Methods for the Full-Information Bifactor model.
    Kim KY
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 43(7):512-526. PubMed ID: 31534287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Examining the underlying latent structure of the sports emotion questionnaire: Insights from the bifactor multidimensional item response theory.
    Hagan JE; Quansah F; Ankomah F; Agormedah EK; Srem-Sai M; Schack T
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1038217. PubMed ID: 36619130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Construct Validity of the Children's Coping Strategies Scale (CCSS): A Bifactor Model Approach.
    Ouyang X; Xin T; Chen F
    Psychol Rep; 2016 Feb; 118(1):199-218. PubMed ID: 29693521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.