BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26044208)

  • 1. Understanding the Harms and Benefits of Cancer Screening: A Model of Factors That Shape Informed Decision Making.
    Petrova D; Garcia-Retamero R; Cokely ET
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Oct; 35(7):847-58. PubMed ID: 26044208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. To screen or not to screen: What factors influence complex screening decisions?
    Petrova D; Garcia-Retamero R; Catena A; van der Pligt J
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2016 Jun; 22(2):247-60. PubMed ID: 27295468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of Tabular and Icon Fact Box Formats on Comprehension of Benefits and Harms of Prostate Cancer Screening: A Randomized Trial.
    McDowell M; Gigerenzer G; Wegwarth O; Rebitschek FG
    Med Decis Making; 2019 Jan; 39(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 30799691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A qualitative study on a decision aid for breast cancer screening: Views from women and health professionals.
    Toledo-Chávarri A; Rué M; Codern-Bové N; Carles-Lavila M; Perestelo-Pérez L; Pérez-Lacasta MJ; Feijoo-Cid M;
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2017 May; 26(3):. PubMed ID: 28145105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of risk communication in a mammography patient decision aid.
    Klein KA; Watson L; Ash JS; Eden KB
    Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Jul; 99(7):1240-1248. PubMed ID: 26965020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lack of shared decision making in cancer screening discussions: results from a national survey.
    Hoffman RM; Elmore JG; Fairfield KM; Gerstein BS; Levin CA; Pignone MP
    Am J Prev Med; 2014 Sep; 47(3):251-9. PubMed ID: 24923862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Informed decision making and prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing for prostate cancer: a randomised controlled trial exploring the impact of a brief patient decision aid on men's knowledge, attitudes and intention to be tested.
    Watson E; Hewitson P; Brett J; Bukach C; Evans R; Edwards A; Elwyn G; Cargill A; Austoker J
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Nov; 63(3):367-79. PubMed ID: 16875796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A systematic assessment of benefits and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions.
    Pace LE; Keating NL
    JAMA; 2014 Apr; 311(13):1327-35. PubMed ID: 24691608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medical students, clinical preventive services, and shared decision-making.
    Keefe CW; Thompson ME; Noel MM
    Acad Med; 2002 Nov; 77(11):1160-1. PubMed ID: 12431938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health literacy-listening skill and patient questions following cancer prevention and screening discussions.
    Mazor KM; Rubin DL; Roblin DW; Williams AE; Han PK; Gaglio B; Cutrona SL; Costanza ME; Wagner JL
    Health Expect; 2016 Aug; 19(4):920-34. PubMed ID: 26202787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Personalised informed choice on evidence and controversy on mammography screening: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Roberto A; Colombo C; Candiani G; Giordano L; Mantellini P; Paci E; Satolli R; Valenza M; Mosconi P
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Jun; 17(1):429. PubMed ID: 28629329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decision-making about mammographic screening: pursuing informed choice.
    Hersch J; Jansen J; McCaffery K
    Climacteric; 2018 Jun; 21(3):209-213. PubMed ID: 29419315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Danish Women Want to Participate in a Hypothetical Breast Cancer Screening with Harms and No Reduction in Mortality: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
    Røssell EL; Bo A; Grønborg TK; Kristiansen IS; Borgquist S; Scherer LD; Støvring H
    Med Decis Making; 2023 May; 43(4):403-416. PubMed ID: 36734154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing perceived clarity of information on overdiagnosis used for breast and prostate cancer screening in England: an experimental survey.
    Ghanouni A; Renzi C; McBride E; Waller J
    BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e015955. PubMed ID: 28827249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can you un-ring the bell? A qualitative study of how affect influences cancer screening decisions.
    Driedger SM; Annable G; Brouwers M; Turner D; Maier R
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Sep; 17(1):647. PubMed ID: 28903742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Informed decision making on PSA testing for the detection of prostate cancer: an evaluation of a leaflet with risk indicator.
    van Vugt HA; Roobol MJ; Venderbos LD; Joosten-van Zwanenburg E; Essink-Bot ML; Steyerberg EW; Bangma CH; Korfage IJ
    Eur J Cancer; 2010 Feb; 46(3):669-77. PubMed ID: 20022239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preconceptions influence women's perceptions of information on breast cancer screening: a qualitative study.
    Henriksen MJ; Guassora AD; Brodersen J
    BMC Res Notes; 2015 Sep; 8():404. PubMed ID: 26336075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Persuasive Interventions for Controversial Cancer Screening Recommendations: Testing a Novel Approach to Help Patients Make Evidence-Based Decisions.
    Saver BG; Mazor KM; Luckmann R; Cutrona SL; Hayes M; Gorodetsky T; Esparza N; Bacigalupe G
    Ann Fam Med; 2017 Jan; 15(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 28376460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are decision aids leading to shared prostate cancer screening decisions among African-American men?: iDecide.
    Owens OL; Kim S; Tavakoli AS
    Cancer Causes Control; 2019 Jul; 30(7):713-719. PubMed ID: 31093861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.