409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26044410)
1. Usefulness of elastography in predicting the outcome of Foley catheter labour induction.
Wozniak S; Czuczwar P; Szkodziak P; Paszkowski T
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Jun; 55(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 26044410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Successful induction of labor: prediction by preinduction cervical length, angle of progression and cervical elastography.
Pereira S; Frick AP; Poon LC; Zamprakou A; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Oct; 44(4):468-75. PubMed ID: 24832011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter pre-induction of labor].
Jagielska I; Kazdepka-Ziemińska A; Janicki R; Fórmaniak J; Walentowicz-Sadłecka M; Grabiec M
Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 23700844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Elastography of the uterine cervix: implications for success of induction of labor.
Swiatkowska-Freund M; Preis K
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jul; 38(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 21484905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Unsucessful labour induction in women with unfavourable cervical scores: predictors and management.
Caliskan E; Dilbaz S; Gelisen O; Dilbaz B; Ozturk N; Haberal A
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 15598298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical ripening with a Foley catheter: the role of pre- and postripening ultrasound examination of the cervix.
Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Tomera S; Scandroglio S; Colombo G; Bolis P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jan; 196(1):41.e1-7. PubMed ID: 17240227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.
Jozwiak M; Oude Rengerink K; Benthem M; van Beek E; Dijksterhuis MG; de Graaf IM; van Huizen ME; Oudijk MA; Papatsonis DN; Perquin DA; Porath M; van der Post JA; Rijnders RJ; Scheepers HC; Spaanderman ME; van Pampus MG; de Leeuw JW; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW;
Lancet; 2011 Dec; 378(9809):2095-103. PubMed ID: 22030144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of cervical elastography in predicting labor induction success: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Londero AP; Schmitz R; Bertozzi S; Driul L; Fruscalzo A
J Perinat Med; 2016 Mar; 44(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 26011923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pre-induction cervical assessment using transvaginal ultrasound versus Bishops cervical scoring as predictors of successful induction of labour in term pregnancies: A hospital-based comparative clinical trial.
Abdullah ZHA; Chew KT; Velayudham VRV; Yahaya Z; Jamil AAM; Abu MA; Ghani NAA; Ismail NAM
PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262387. PubMed ID: 35081157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1, Bishop score, and sonographic cervical length: tolerability and prediction of vaginal birth and vaginal birth within 24 hours following labour induction in nulliparous women.
Vallikkannu N; Lam WK; Omar SZ; Tan PC
BJOG; 2017 Jul; 124(8):1274-1283. PubMed ID: 27348806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Elastography of cervix to predict delay from induction to delivery].
Sonnier L; Bouhanna P; Arnou C; Rozenberg P
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 Dec; 42(12):827-31. PubMed ID: 25458805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low Bishop score.
Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Chastang C; Ville Y
BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 15663583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy and Safety of Foley Catheter Balloon for Cervix Priming in Term Pregnancy.
Policiano C; Pimenta M; Martins D; Clode N
Acta Med Port; 2017 Apr; 30(4):281-284. PubMed ID: 28555553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative sonoelastography of the uterine cervix in predicting successful outcome of induction of labour.
Agarwal M; Sinha S; Nitu N; Roy R; Kunwar K; Kumar P; Kumar S; Prasad I
SAGE Open Med; 2023; 11():20503121231166637. PubMed ID: 37065977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pre-induction sonographic assessment of the cervix in the prediction of successful induction of labour in nulliparous women.
Keepanasseril A; Suri V; Bagga R; Aggarwal N
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Oct; 47(5):389-93. PubMed ID: 17877596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective randomized trial comparing Foley catheter, oxytocin, and combination Foley catheter-oxytocin for labour induction with unfavourable cervix.
El Khouly NI
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Apr; 37(3):309-314. PubMed ID: 27922285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictors of perinatal outcomes and economic costs for late-term induction of labour.
Oros D; Garcia-Simon R; Clemente J; Fabre E; Romero MA; Montañes A
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 56(3):286-290. PubMed ID: 28600035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The predictive value of cervical shear wave elastography in the outcome of labor induction.
Lu J; Cheng YKY; Ho SYS; Sahota DS; Hui LL; Poon LC; Leung TY
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Jan; 99(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 31691266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of transvaginal sonographic cervical length measurement and Bishop score for predicting labour induction outcomes.
Vince K; Poljičanin T; Matijević R
J Perinat Med; 2022 Nov; 50(9):1198-1202. PubMed ID: 35654131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Elastography in the examination of the uterine cervix before labor induction].
Preis K; Swiatkowska-Freund M; Pankrac Z
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Oct; 81(10):757-61. PubMed ID: 21117304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
