These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26044471)

  • 1. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement with Scheimpflug-based noncontact tonometer with and without hydrogel contact lenses.
    Kumar M; Shetty R; Jayadev C; Dutta D; Nicolsan MD; Nagaraj S; Kumar RS
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 63(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 26044471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The measurement of intraocular pressure over positive soft contact lenses by rebound tonometry.
    Zeri F; De Cusatis M; Lupelli L; Swann PG
    J Optom; 2016; 9(3):182-8. PubMed ID: 26499996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 24-hour intraocular pressure rhythm in young healthy subjects evaluated with continuous monitoring using a contact lens sensor.
    Mottet B; Aptel F; Romanet JP; Hubanova R; Pépin JL; Chiquet C
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 131(12):1507-16. PubMed ID: 24158696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses on the measurement of intraocular pressure with rebound tonometry.
    Zeri F; Calcatelli P; Donini B; Lupelli L; Zarrilli L; Swann PG
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2011 Dec; 34(6):260-5. PubMed ID: 21636312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hourly awakening vs continuous contact lens sensor measurements of 24-hour intraocular pressure: effect on sleep macrostructure and intraocular pressure rhythm.
    Aptel F; Tamisier R; Pépin JL; Mottet B; Hubanova R; Romanet JP; Chiquet C
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Oct; 132(10):1232-8. PubMed ID: 25074578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry over soft contact lenses.
    Gogniat F; Steinegger D; Nosch DS; Joos R; Goldschmidt M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Feb; 90(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 23292044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Rebound, Noncontact, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Children.
    Feng CS; Jin KW; Yi K; Choi DG
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 160(5):937-943.e1. PubMed ID: 26210864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a novel Scheimpflug-based non-contact tonometer in healthy subjects and patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
    Reznicek L; Muth D; Kampik A; Neubauer AS; Hirneiss C
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 97(11):1410-4. PubMed ID: 23969314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new tonometer--the Corvis ST tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Hong J; Xu J; Wei A; Deng SX; Cui X; Yu X; Sun X
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 54(1):659-65. PubMed ID: 23307970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of lens power and center thickness on the intraocular pressure measured through soft lenses: a comparison of two noncontact tonometers.
    Ogbuehi KC
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2012 Jun; 35(3):118-28. PubMed ID: 22322110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Applanation tonometry in silicone hydrogel contact lens wearers.
    Allen RJ; Dev Borman A; Saleh GM
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Dec; 30(5):267-9. PubMed ID: 17382579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The accuracy of Goldmann applanation tonometry over silicone hydrogel contact lenses in patients with glaucoma.
    Gomes BA; Turiel P; Cavalcanti RS; Moraes HV; Santhiago MR
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Aug; 37(4):297-9. PubMed ID: 24862386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in intraocular pressure values measured with noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer (ORA) and corvis scheimpflug technology tonometer (CST) in the early phase after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
    Shen Y; Su X; Liu X; Miao H; Fang X; Zhou X
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):205. PubMed ID: 27863469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intraocular pressure measurement with ocular response analyzer over soft contact lens.
    Sapkota K; Franco S; Lira M
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Dec; 37(6):415-9. PubMed ID: 25086831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modern disposable hydrogel contact lens removal has a minimal effect on intraocular pressure.
    Hamilton-Maxwell K; King N
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Mar; 35(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 25761581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of the modulus of the lens material on intraocular pressure measurement through soft contact lenses.
    Boyraz S; Güngör I
    Ir J Med Sci; 2013 Sep; 182(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 23207914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability.
    Tonnu PA; Ho T; Sharma K; White E; Bunce C; Garway-Heath D
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jul; 89(7):847-50. PubMed ID: 15965164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noncontact tonometry through soft contact lenses.
    McMonnies CW
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1986 Dec; 63(12):948-51. PubMed ID: 3799805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative measurement of intraocular pressure by Icare tonometry and Airpuff tonometry in healthy subjects and patients wearing therapeutic soft contact lenses.
    Anton A; Neuburger M; Böhringer D; Jordan JF
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Jul; 251(7):1791-5. PubMed ID: 23532453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intraocular pressure by noncontact tonometry over an amniotic membrane patch in humans.
    Yoshita T; Kobayashi A; Takahashi M; Sugiyama K; Tseng SC
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 141(3):508-11. PubMed ID: 16490497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.