233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26044551)
21. Comparison of the mechanical properties of the heel pad between young and elderly adults.
Hsu TC; Wang CL; Tsai WC; Kuo JK; Tang FT
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1998 Sep; 79(9):1101-4. PubMed ID: 9749691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biomechanical behaviour of heel pad tissue: experimental testing, constitutive formulation, and numerical modelling.
Natali AN; Fontanella CG; Carniel EL; Young M
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 May; 225(5):449-59. PubMed ID: 21755775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Parameter identification of hyperelastic material properties of the heel pad based on an analytical contact mechanics model of a spherical indentation.
Suzuki R; Ito K; Lee T; Ogihara N
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Jan; 65():753-760. PubMed ID: 27764748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The mechanical characteristics of the human heel pad during foot strike in running: an in vivo cineradiographic study.
De Clercq D; Aerts P; Kunnen M
J Biomech; 1994 Oct; 27(10):1213-22. PubMed ID: 7962009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Investigation on the load-displacement curves of a human healthy heel pad: In vivo compression data compared to numerical results.
Fontanella CG; Matteoli S; Carniel EL; Wilhjelm JE; Virga A; Corvi A; Natali AN
Med Eng Phys; 2012 Nov; 34(9):1253-9. PubMed ID: 22265099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Microchambers and macrochambers in heel pads: are they functionally different?
Hsu CC; Tsai WC; Wang CL; Pao SH; Shau YW; Chuan YS
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2007 Jun; 102(6):2227-31. PubMed ID: 17272407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Bulk compressive properties of the heel fat pad during walking: a pilot investigation in plantar heel pain.
Wearing SC; Smeathers JE; Yates B; Urry SR; Dubois P
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 May; 24(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 19232452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The potential influence of the heel counter on internal stress during static standing: a combined finite element and positional MRI investigation.
Spears IR; Miller-Young JE; Sharma J; Ker RF; Smith FW
J Biomech; 2007; 40(12):2774-80. PubMed ID: 17362970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Shear wave elastography can assess the in-vivo nonlinear mechanical behavior of heel-pad.
Chatzistergos PE; Behforootan S; Allan D; Naemi R; Chockalingam N
J Biomech; 2018 Oct; 80():144-150. PubMed ID: 30241799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Energy aspects for elastic and viscous shoe soles and playing surfaces.
Nigg BM; Anton M
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1995 Jan; 27(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 7898345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Role of EVA viscoelastic properties in the protective performance of a sport shoe: computational studies.
Even-Tzur N; Weisz E; Hirsch-Falk Y; Gefen A
Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(5):289-99. PubMed ID: 17075164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dynamic material characterization of the human heel pad based on in vivo experimental tests and numerical analysis.
Kardeh M; Vogl TJ; Huebner F; Nelson K; Stief F; Silber G
Med Eng Phys; 2016 Sep; 38(9):940-5. PubMed ID: 27387903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Variations in heel pad mechanical properties variation between children and young adults.
Wang CL; Hsu TC; Shau YW; Wong MK
J Formos Med Assoc; 1998 Dec; 97(12):850-4. PubMed ID: 9884488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of material properties of heel pad between adults with and without type 2 diabetes history: An
Yang XG; Teng ZL; Zhang ZM; Wang K; Huang R; Chen WM; Wang C; Chen L; Zhang C; Huang JZ; Wang X; Ma X; Geng X
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():894383. PubMed ID: 36060939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The viscoelastic standard nonlinear solid model: predicting the response of the lumbar intervertebral disk to low-frequency vibrations.
Groth KM; Granata KP
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):031005. PubMed ID: 18532854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of loading conditions on stress in the barefooted heel pad.
Spears IR; Miller-Young JE; Waters M; Rome K
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2005 Jun; 37(6):1030-6. PubMed ID: 15947730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomechanics of the heel pad for type 2 diabetic patients.
Hsu TC; Lee YS; Shau YW
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2002 May; 17(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 12034122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The mechanical properties of the human heel pad: a paradox resolved.
Aerts P; Ker RF; De Clercq D; Ilsley DW; Alexander RM
J Biomech; 1995 Nov; 28(11):1299-308. PubMed ID: 8522543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The relationship of the heel pad compressibility and plantar pressure distribution.
Kanatli U; Yetkin H; Simsek A; Besli K; Ozturk A
Foot Ankle Int; 2001 Aug; 22(8):662-5. PubMed ID: 11527028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. In vivo examination of the dynamic properties of the human heel pad.
Kinoshita H; Ogawa T; Kuzuhara K; Ikuta K
Int J Sports Med; 1993 Aug; 14(6):312-9. PubMed ID: 8407060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
