These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26044645)

  • 1. Intraoperative radiography for evaluation of surgical miscounts.
    Walter WR; Amis ES; Sprayregen S; Haramati LB
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Aug; 12(8):824-9. PubMed ID: 26044645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Positive control radiographs for identifying a suspected retained surgical item.
    Porter KK; Woods RW; Bailey PD; Scott WW; Johnson PT
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Aug; 12(8):830-2. PubMed ID: 26014923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Natural history of retained surgical items supports the need for team training, early recognition, and prompt retrieval.
    Stawicki SP; Cook CH; Anderson HL; Chowayou L; Cipolla J; Ahmed HM; Coyle SM; Gracias VH; Evans DC; Marchigiani R; Adams RC; Seamon MJ; Martin ND; Steinberg SM; Moffatt-Bruce SD;
    Am J Surg; 2014 Jul; 208(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 24524864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of plain abdominal radiographs in the detection of retained surgical needles in the peritoneal cavity.
    Ponrartana S; Coakley FV; Yeh BM; Breiman RS; Qayyum A; Joe BN; Poder L; Lu Y; Gibbs VC; Roberts JP
    Ann Surg; 2008 Jan; 247(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 18156915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Miscount incidents: a novel approach to exploring risk factors for unintentionally retained surgical items.
    Judson TJ; Howell MD; Guglielmi C; Canacari E; Sands K
    Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2013 Oct; 39(10):468-74. PubMed ID: 24195200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The frequency and significance of discrepancies in the surgical count.
    Greenberg CC; Regenbogen SE; Lipsitz SR; Diaz-Flores R; Gawande AA
    Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):337-41. PubMed ID: 18650646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incidence and characteristics of potential and actual retained foreign object events in surgical patients.
    Cima RR; Kollengode A; Garnatz J; Storsveen A; Weisbrod C; Deschamps C
    J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Jul; 207(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 18589366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retained surgical sponges (gossypiboma).
    Bani-Hani KE; Gharaibeh KA; Yaghan RJ
    Asian J Surg; 2005 Apr; 28(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 15851364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prevention of retained surgical items.
    Feldman DL
    Mt Sinai J Med; 2011; 78(6):865-71. PubMed ID: 22069210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnosis and management of retained foreign objects.
    Yildirim T; Parlakgumus A; Yildirim S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 May; 25(5):367-71. PubMed ID: 26008665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of a radiofrequency detection system as an adjunct to manual counting protocols for tracking surgical sponges: a prospective trial of 2,285 patients.
    Rupp CC; Kagarise MJ; Nelson SM; Deal AM; Phillips S; Chadwick J; Petty T; Meyer AA; Kim HJ
    J Am Coll Surg; 2012 Oct; 215(4):524-33. PubMed ID: 22770865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wrong-Site Surgery, Retained Surgical Items, and Surgical Fires : A Systematic Review of Surgical Never Events.
    Hempel S; Maggard-Gibbons M; Nguyen DK; Dawes AJ; Miake-Lye I; Beroes JM; Booth MJ; Miles JN; Shanman R; Shekelle PG
    JAMA Surg; 2015 Aug; 150(8):796-805. PubMed ID: 26061125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk factors for retained surgical items: a meta-analysis and proposed risk stratification system.
    Moffatt-Bruce SD; Cook CH; Steinberg SM; Stawicki SP
    J Surg Res; 2014 Aug; 190(2):429-36. PubMed ID: 24953990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Leaving a foreign object in the body of a patient during abdominal surgery: still a current problem.
    Szymocha M; Pacan M; Anufrowicz M; Jurek T; Rorat M
    Pol Przegl Chir; 2019 May; 91(6):35-40. PubMed ID: 31849358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgical counts can be risky business!
    Porteous J
    Can Oper Room Nurs J; 2004 Dec; 22(4):6-8, 10, 12. PubMed ID: 15709630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness of routine radiographs after emergent open cavity operations.
    Dossett LA; Dittus RS; Speroff T; May AK; Cotton BA
    Surgery; 2008 Aug; 144(2):317-21. PubMed ID: 18656641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implementing AORN recommended practices for prevention of retained surgical items.
    Goldberg JL; Feldman DL
    AORN J; 2012 Feb; 95(2):205-16; quiz 217-9. PubMed ID: 22283912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Iatrogenes of manipulator character in abdominal surgery].
    Ungurian VM; Grinev MV; Demko AE; Povzun SA
    Vestn Khir Im I I Grek; 2013; 172(5):46-50. PubMed ID: 24640748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imaging of surgical paraphernalia: what belongs in the patient and what does not.
    Wolfson KA; Seeger LL; Kadell BM; Eckardt JJ
    Radiographics; 2000; 20(6):1665-73. PubMed ID: 11112821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of radiofrequency device sensitivity for the detection of retained surgical sponges in patients with morbid obesity.
    Steelman VM; Alasagheirin MH
    Arch Surg; 2012 Oct; 147(10):955-60. PubMed ID: 23070411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.