These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26044646)
1. Mechanical and photoelastic analysis of conventional screws and cannulated screws for sagittal split osteotomy fixation: a comparative study. Lima CJ; Falci SG; Rodrigues DC; Marchiori ÉC; Moreira RW Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 19(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 26044646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of the fixation of mandibular symphysis fractures using conical cannulated screws: mechanical and photoelastic tests. Falci SG; Rodrigues DC; Marchiori EC; Brancher G; Makyama A; Fernandes Moreira RW Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 Aug; 118(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 24906943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative biomechanical and photoelastic evaluation of different fixation techniques of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement. Sato FR; Asprino L; Consani S; de Moraes M J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 68(1):160-6. PubMed ID: 20006171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: setback surgery. Brasileiro BF; Grotta-Grempel R; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):941-51. PubMed ID: 21752510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative evaluation of the hybrid technique for fixation of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement by mechanical, photoelastic, and finite element analysis. Sato FR; Asprino L; Consani S; Noritomi PY; de Moraes M Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Nov; 114(5 Suppl):S60-8. PubMed ID: 23083958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative evaluation of different fixation techniques of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy in 10 mm advancements: Mechanical testing and screw insertion torque. Sigua-Rodriguez EA; de Medeiros RC; Goulart DR; Bomfim-Azevedo VL; Olate S; de Albergaria-Barbosa JR J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2082-2087. PubMed ID: 30322777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of five different fixation techniques of sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite elements analysis. Sato FR; Asprino L; Noritomi PY; da Silva JV; de Moraes M Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 41(8):934-41. PubMed ID: 22510341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery. Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism. Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro comparison of 1.5 mm vs. 2.0 mm screws for fixation in the sagittal split osteotomy. Scaf de Molon R; de Ávila ÉD; Scartezini GR; Bonini Campos JA; Vaz LG; Real Gabrielli MF; Pereira Filho VA J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 39(8):574-7. PubMed ID: 21227709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Photoelastic analysis of internal screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Kim HC; Essaki S; Kameyama T; Yamamoto K J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1993 Sep; 21(6):266-70. PubMed ID: 8227377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Stability of screw fixation following sagittal splitting osteotomy of the mandibular ramus]. Eba M Meikai Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1990; 19(3):356-76. PubMed ID: 2134896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Ribeiro-Junior PD; Magro-Filho O; Shastri KA; Papageorge MB J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 68(4):724-30. PubMed ID: 19962812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of fixation methods of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular setback. Oh JS; Kim SG J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 43(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 25550092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An in vitro comparison of an adjustable bone fixation system. Van Sickels JE; Peterson GP; Holms S; Haug RH J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 63(11):1620-5. PubMed ID: 16243179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro biomechanical comparison of six different fixation methods following 5-mm sagittal split advancement osteotomies. Oguz Y; Watanabe ER; Reis JM; Spin-Neto R; Gabrielli MA; Pereira-Filho VA Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Aug; 44(8):984-8. PubMed ID: 25840861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative study of biomechanical stability of resorbable and titanium fixation systems after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with a novel designed in-vitro testing unit. Ulu M; Soylu E; Kelebek S; Dikici S; Oflaz H J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 46(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 29295797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of stress distribution on fixation of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with resorbable plates and screws using the finite-element method. Sarkarat F; Motamedi MH; Bohluli B; Moharamnejad N; Ansari S; Shahabi-Sirjani H J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 70(6):1434-8. PubMed ID: 21820783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stability of biodegradable metal (Mg-Ca-Zn alloy) screws compared with absorbable polymer and titanium screws for sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible using the finite element analysis model. Lee JH; Han HS; Kim YC; Lee JY; Lee BK J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 45(10):1639-1646. PubMed ID: 28818322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]