These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26044893)

  • 1. Transradial versus transfemoral approach in coronary angiography: a matched pair analysis of cath lab equipment costs.
    Plehn G; Örnek A; Gkiouras G; Vormbrock J; Maagh P; Butz T; Meissner A
    J Vasc Access; 2015; 16(5):413-7. PubMed ID: 26044893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of One-Catheter Strategy with TIG I Catheter on Coronary Catheterization Performance and Economic Costs.
    Costa-Mateu J; Fernández-Rodríguez D; Rivera K; Casanova J; Irigaray P; Zielonka M; Pereyra-Acha E; Aldomá A; Worner F
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2019 Nov; 113(5):960-968. PubMed ID: 31800721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Operator learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary interventions: implications for the initiation of a transradial access program in contemporary US practice.
    Barbash IM; Minha S; Gallino R; Lager R; Badr S; Loh JP; Kitabata H; Pendyala LK; Torguson R; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jun; 15(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 24746598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomised comparison of JUDkins vs. tiGEr catheter in coronary angiography via the right radial artery: the JUDGE study.
    Xanthopoulou I; Stavrou K; Davlouros P; Tsigkas G; Koufou E; Almpanis G; Koutouzis M; Tsiafoutis I; Perperis A; Moulias A; Koutsogiannis N; Hahalis G
    EuroIntervention; 2018 Mar; 13(16):1950-1958. PubMed ID: 29061547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Standard Catheters Versus Radial Artery-Specific Catheter in Patients Who Underwent Coronary Angiography Through Transradial Access.
    Chen O; Goel S; Acholonu M; Kulbak G; Verma S; Travlos E; Casazza R; Borgen E; Malik B; Friedman M; Moskovits N; Frankel R; Shani J; Ayzenberg S
    Am J Cardiol; 2016 Aug; 118(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 27269989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health Economic Analysis of Access Site Practice in England During Changes in Practice: Insights From the British Cardiovascular Interventional Society.
    Mamas MA; Tosh J; Hulme W; Hoskins N; Bungey G; Ludman P; de Belder M; Kwok CS; Verin N; Kinnaird T; Bennett E; Curzen N; Nolan J; Kontopantelis E
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2018 May; 11(5):e004482. PubMed ID: 29743163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Our experience with transradial approach for coronary angiography.
    Vefali V; Arslan U
    Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2008 Apr; 36(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 18626208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative Efficacy of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Schussler JM; Vasudevan A; von Bose LJ; Won JI; McCullough PA
    Am J Cardiol; 2016 Aug; 118(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 27378143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transradial access in a cath lab with moderate procedural volume: a single operator's experience.
    Rigattieri S; Ferraiuolo G; Loschiavo P
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2007 Jun; 55(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 17534248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention: the RADIAL-CABG Trial (RADIAL Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography and Intervention).
    Michael TT; Alomar M; Papayannis A; Mogabgab O; Patel VG; Rangan BV; Luna M; Hastings JL; Grodin J; Abdullah S; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1138-44. PubMed ID: 24139930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Propensity-adjusted cost analysis of radial versus femoral access for neuroendovascular procedures.
    Catapano JS; Ducruet AF; Koester SW; Cole TS; Baranoski JF; Rutledge C; Majmundar N; Srinivasan VM; Wilkinson DA; Lawton MT; Albuquerque FC
    J Neurointerv Surg; 2021 Aug; 13(8):752-754. PubMed ID: 33106321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost effectiveness of radial access for diagnostic cardiac catheterization and coronary intervention.
    Applegate R; Sacrinty M; Schafer P; Smith J; Gandhi S; Kutcher M; Santos R; Cecile A; Little W
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 82(4):E375-84. PubMed ID: 23074085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The fluoroscopy time, door to balloon time, contrast volume use and prevalence of vascular access site failure with transradial versus transfemoral approach in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: A systematic review & meta-analysis.
    Singh S; Singh M; Grewal N; Khosla S
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2015 Dec; 16(8):491-7. PubMed ID: 26563537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transfemoral approach with systematic use of FemoSeal™ closure device compared to transradial approach in primary angioplasty.
    Alonzo A; Rigattieri S; Giovannelli F; Di Russo C; Sciahbasi A; Berni A; Volpe M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):849-54. PubMed ID: 26104978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Novel diagnostic catheter specifically designed for both coronary arteries via the right transradial approach. A prospective, randomized trial of Tiger II vs. Judkins catheters.
    Kim SM; Kim DK; Kim DI; Kim DS; Joo SJ; Lee JW
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2006; 22(3-4):295-303. PubMed ID: 16328852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An experience on radial versus femoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography in Turkey.
    Yiğit F; Sezgin AT; Erol T; Demircan S; Tekin G; Katircibaşi T; Tekin A; Müderrisoğlu H
    Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2006 Sep; 6(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 16943106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 5-Fr sheathless transradial cardiac catheterization using conventional catheters and balloon assisted tracking; a new approach to downsizing.
    Mamas MA; George S; Ratib K; Kwok CS; Elkhazin A; Sandhu K; Stubbs J; Luxford P; Nolan J
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017; 18(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 27707595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Single-Center, Randomized, Controlled Comparison of the Transradial vs Transfemoral Approach for Cerebral Angiography: A Learning Curve Analysis.
    Liu Y; Wen X; Bai J; Ji X; Zhi K; Qu L
    J Endovasc Ther; 2019 Oct; 26(5):717-724. PubMed ID: 31257996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A reality check in transradial access: a single-centre comparison of transradial and transfemoral access for abdominal and peripheral intervention.
    Hung ML; Lee EW; McWilliams JP; Padia SA; Ding P; Kee ST
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 29926207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of Vascular Access Site Choice on Radiation Exposure During Coronary Angiography: The REVERE Trial (Randomized Evaluation of Vascular Entry Site and Radiation Exposure).
    Pancholy SB; Joshi P; Shah S; Rao SV; Bertrand OF; Patel TM
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 8(9):1189-1196. PubMed ID: 26210808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.