These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26045380)
1. Retrieval of gallbladder through epigastric port as compared to umbilical port after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Memon JM; Memon MR; Arija D; Bozdar AG; Talpur MM Pak J Pharm Sci; 2014 Nov; 27(6 Spec No.):2165-8. PubMed ID: 26045380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Postoperative port-site pain after gall bladder retrieval from epigastric vs. umbilical port in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Siddiqui NA; Azami R; Murtaza G; Nasim S Int J Surg; 2012; 10(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 22449831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative study of postoperative port-site pain after gallbladder retrieval from umbilical versus epigastric ports in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hajong R; Dhal MR; Natung T; Khongwar D; Jyoti AB; Newme K J Family Med Prim Care; 2019 May; 8(5):1617-1620. PubMed ID: 31198725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retrieval of Gallbladder Via Umbilical Versus Epigastric Port Site During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Hajibandeh S; Hajibandeh S; Clark MC; Barratt OA; Taktak S; Subar D; Henley N Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2019 Oct; 29(5):321-327. PubMed ID: 31033631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Umbilical port versus epigastric port for gallbladder extraction in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis. Kulkarni AA; Sharma G; Deo KB; Jain T Surgeon; 2022 Jun; 20(3):e26-e35. PubMed ID: 33888427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Postoperative Port Site Infections Among Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Either via Umbilical or Epigastric Port. Raj A; Singh S; Raj A; Tajdar Y Cureus; 2023 Nov; 15(11):e48709. PubMed ID: 38094556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Postoperative Port-Site Pain After Gallbladder Retrieval From Epigastric Versus Umbilical Port in Patients of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Symptomatic Cholelithiasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Jain A; Tajudeen M; Sreekanth A; Raj Kumar N Cureus; 2021 Sep; 13(9):e18087. PubMed ID: 34692302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Epigastric port retrieval of the gallbladder following laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with the reduced risk of port site infection and port site incisional hernia: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sood S; Imsirovic A; Sains P; Singh KK; Sajid MS Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2020 Jul; 55():244-251. PubMed ID: 32528673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of gallbladder retrieval from an epigastric vs. umbilical port on trocar-site complications A prospective randomized study. Kaya C; Bozkurt E; Yazici P Ann Ital Chir; 2017; 88():326-329. PubMed ID: 29051399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frequency and prevention of laparoscopic port site infection. Taj MN; Iqbal Y; Akbar Z J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2012; 24(3-4):197-9. PubMed ID: 24669653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Midline gallbladder makes a challenge for surgeons during laparoscopic cholecystectomy; case series of 6 patients. Mohammed AA; Arif SH Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2019 Apr; 40():14-17. PubMed ID: 30962925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Port Site Morbidities Following the Extraction of the Gallbladder from the Umbilical Port in Comparison to the Epigastric Port in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial. Anand A; Jha AK; Kumar M; Kumar S; Kumar P Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e45770. PubMed ID: 37745735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized trial of umbilical incisional hernia in high-risk patients: extraction of gallbladder through subxiphoid port vs. umbilical port after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Li M; Cao B; Gong R; Sun D; Zhang P; Jiang X; Sheng Y Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne; 2018 Sep; 13(3):342-349. PubMed ID: 30302147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Iatrogenic gall bladder perforations in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 200 cases. Zubair M; Habib L; Mirza MR; Channa MA; Yousuf M Mymensingh Med J; 2010 Jul; 19(3):422-6. PubMed ID: 20639837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frequency of port site wound infection after Gall Bladder removal with or without retrieval bag in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Rehman HU; Siddiqa M; Munam AU; Khan S J Pak Med Assoc; 2020 Sep; 70(9):1533-1537. PubMed ID: 33040103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gallbladder Retrieval From Epigastric Versus Umbilical Port in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A PRISMA-Compliant Meta-Analysis. Mongelli F; La Regina D; Zschokke I; Ceppi M; Ferrario di Tor Vajana A; Di Giuseppe M; Fischer H; Heeren N; Metzger J; Gass M Surg Innov; 2020 Apr; 27(2):150-159. PubMed ID: 31777324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. No Need of Fascia Closure to Reduce Trocar Site Hernia Rate in Laparoscopic Surgery: A Prospective Study of 200 Non-Obese Patients. Singal R; Zaman M; Mittal A; Singal S; Sandhu K; Mittal A Gastroenterology Res; 2016 Oct; 9(4-5):70-73. PubMed ID: 27785329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single institution experience of single incision trans-umbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy using conventional laparoscopic instruments. Abdelaziz Hassan AM; Elsebae MM; Nasr MM; Nafeh AI Int J Surg; 2012; 10(9):514-7. PubMed ID: 22892095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative analysis of the four-port and three-port trocar access of the conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy--review of the literature. Koichev A Khirurgiia (Sofiia); 2013; (3):26-38. PubMed ID: 24459764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing of the results between single port and three ports in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lee HY; Roh YH; Kim KH; Yoon SH; Choi HJ; Kim YH; Jung GJ; Roh MS Hepatogastroenterology; 2012 Sep; 59(118):1761-4. PubMed ID: 22389268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]