These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26045425)

  • 1. Atmosphere. Challenges of a lowered U.S. ozone standard.
    Cooper OR; Langford AO; Parrish DD; Fahey DW
    Science; 2015 Jun; 348(6239):1096-7. PubMed ID: 26045425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The United States Environmental Protection Agency has decided on a revision of the national environmental quality standards for ozone and particulate matter].
    Hernández-Avila M
    Salud Publica Mex; 1997; 39(5):401-2. PubMed ID: 9424721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Atmospheric Science. China blamed for U.S. ozone.
    Hand E
    Science; 2014 Sep; 345(6202):1233. PubMed ID: 25214586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A second chance. Setting a protective ozone standard.
    Dey R; Van Winkle L; Ewart G; Balmes J; Pinkerton K;
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2010 Feb; 181(4):297-9. PubMed ID: 20130144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. EPA's ozone standard may harm public health and welfare.
    Dudley SE; Gramm WL
    Risk Anal; 1997 Aug; 17(4):403-5. PubMed ID: 9323870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scientific evidence supports stronger limits on ozone.
    Rice MB; Guidotti TL; Cromar KR;
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2015 Mar; 191(5):501-3. PubMed ID: 25536009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accountability within new ozone standards.
    Foley GJ; Georgopoulos PG; Lioy PJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Nov; 37(21):392A-399A. PubMed ID: 14620803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Air-quality standards. EPA adjusts a smog standard to White House preference.
    Stokstad E
    Science; 2008 Mar; 319(5870):1602-3. PubMed ID: 18356496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What Are the Net Benefits of Reducing the Ozone Standard to 65 ppb? An Alternative Analysis.
    Lange SS; Mulholland SE; Honeycutt ME
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Jul; 15(8):. PubMed ID: 30049975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of background ozone on compliance with revised National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
    Williams DJ; Potter WT; Clarkson WW; Sanders DA; Stevens JE
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2009 Jan; 59(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 19216188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of relative response factor methodology for demonstrating attainment of ozone in Houston, Texas.
    Vizuete W; Biton L; Jeffries HE; Couzo E
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2010 Jul; 60(7):838-48. PubMed ID: 20681431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Establishing policy relevant background (PRB) ozone concentrations in the United States.
    McDonald-Buller EC; Allen DT; Brown N; Jacob DJ; Jaffe D; Kolb CE; Lefohn AS; Oltmans S; Parrish DD; Yarwood G; Zhang L
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Nov; 45(22):9484-97. PubMed ID: 21985705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Critical considerations in evaluating scientific evidence of health effects of ambient ozone: a conference report.
    McClellan RO; Frampton MW; Koutrakis P; McDonnell WF; Moolgavkar S; North DW; Smith AE; Smith RL; Utell MJ
    Inhal Toxicol; 2009 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():1-36. PubMed ID: 19731972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of recent state implementation plans for 8-hour ozone.
    Pegues AH; Cohan DS; Digar A; Douglass C; Wilson RS
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Feb; 62(2):252-61. PubMed ID: 22442941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decision time on standards for particulate matter in the United States.
    Guidotti TL
    Arch Environ Occup Health; 2013; 68(2):63-5. PubMed ID: 23428054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Particulate matter and the environmental protection agency: setting the right standard.
    Thurston GD; Balmes JR;
    Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol; 2012 Dec; 47(6):727-8. PubMed ID: 23204434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meeting the future challenges of air quality management in the United States.
    Bradley MJ
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2008; 71(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 18080891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Padney, M D and Nathwani J S (2003). Canada wide standard for particulate matter and ozone: cost benefit analysis using a life quality index. Risk Analysis, 23(1), 55-67.
    Stieb DM; Krupnick AJ; Adamowicz WL; De Civita P; Burnett RT; Jessiman B
    Risk Anal; 2004 Apr; 24(2):305-6; author reply 307-9. PubMed ID: 15078300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. BEHIND THE NUMBERS. GOP legislators choke on ozone standards.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2015 Sep; 349(6254):1268. PubMed ID: 26383927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Particulate air pollution and mortality--clearing the air.
    Ware JH
    N Engl J Med; 2000 Dec; 343(24):1798-9. PubMed ID: 11114320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.