These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

670 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26045510)

  • 1. Do questions help? The impact of audience response systems on medical student learning: a randomised controlled trial.
    Mains TE; Cofrancesco J; Milner SM; Shah NG; Goldberg H
    Postgrad Med J; 2015 Jul; 91(1077):361-7. PubMed ID: 26045510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of differing Audience Response System question types on student attention in the veterinary medical classroom.
    Rush BR; Hafen M; Biller DS; Davis EG; Klimek JA; Kukanich B; Larson RL; Roush JK; Schermerhorn T; Wilkerson MJ; White BJ
    J Vet Med Educ; 2010; 37(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 20576903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An audience response system may influence student performance on anatomy examination questions.
    Hoyt A; McNulty JA; Gruener G; Chandrasekhar A; Espiritu B; Ensminger D; Price R; Naheedy R
    Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(6):295-9. PubMed ID: 20890951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Audience response systems in medical student education benefit learners and presenters.
    Nayak L; Erinjeri JP
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 18348839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examining the impact of audience response systems on student performance in anatomy education: a randomised controlled trial.
    Fergusson SJ; Aka JJ; Hennessy CM; Wilson AJ; Parson SH; Harrison EM; Finn GM; Gillingwater TH
    Scott Med J; 2018 Feb; 63(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 29911503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electronic voting to encourage interactive lectures: a randomised trial.
    Duggan PM; Palmer E; Devitt P
    BMC Med Educ; 2007 Jul; 7():25. PubMed ID: 17655773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An audience response system strategy to improve student motivation, attention, and feedback.
    Cain J; Black EP; Rohr J
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2009 Apr; 73(2):21. PubMed ID: 19513159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of using an audience response system on learning, motivation and information retention in the orthodontic teaching of undergraduate dental students: a cross-over trial.
    Dhaliwal HK; Allen M; Kang J; Bates C; Hodge T
    J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 42(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 25849094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audience response systems: technology to engage learners.
    Collins J
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Sep; 5(9):993-1000. PubMed ID: 18755440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Novel educational approach for medical students: improved retention rates using interactive medical software compared with traditional lecture-based format.
    Subramanian A; Timberlake M; Mittakanti H; Lara M; Brandt ML
    J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(2):253-6. PubMed ID: 22365876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Phone-based audience response system as an adjunct in orthodontic teaching of undergraduate dental students: a cross-over randomised controlled trial.
    Alharbi F; Alazmi KF; El Momani BR; Al-Muzian L; Wertheimer M; Almukhtar A; Almuzian M
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 Nov; 20(1):435. PubMed ID: 33198761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using an audience response system (ARS) in a face-to-face and distance education CPT/HCPCS coding course.
    Harris ST; Zeng X
    Perspect Health Inf Manag; 2010 Jan; 7(Winter):1f. PubMed ID: 20697463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lecture recording system in anatomy: possible benefit to auditory learners.
    Bacro TR; Gebregziabher M; Ariail J
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(6):376-84. PubMed ID: 23508921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Self-directed learning can outperform direct instruction in the course of a modern German medical curriculum - results of a mixed methods trial.
    Peine A; Kabino K; Spreckelsen C
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Jun; 16():158. PubMed ID: 27256081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips.
    Caldwell JE
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2007; 6(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 17339389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-based teaching is as good as face to face lecture-based teaching of evidence based medicine: a randomised controlled trial.
    Davis J; Chryssafidou E; Zamora J; Davies D; Khan K; Coomarasamy A
    BMC Med Educ; 2007 Jul; 7():23. PubMed ID: 17659076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating the effect of interactive audience response systems on the perceived learning experience of nursing students.
    Porter AG; Tousman S
    J Nurs Educ; 2010 Sep; 49(9):523-7. PubMed ID: 20509583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Audience-response systems for evaluation of pediatric lectures--comparison with a classic end-of-term online-based evaluation.
    Bode SF; Straub C; Giesler M; Biller S; Forster J; Krüger M
    GMS Z Med Ausbild; 2015; 32(2):Doc18. PubMed ID: 26038683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer-aided vs. tutor-delivered teaching of exposure therapy for phobia/panic: randomized controlled trial with pre-registration nursing students.
    Gega L; Norman IJ; Marks IM
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2007 Mar; 44(3):397-405. PubMed ID: 16631177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of an audience response system on resident learning and retention of lecture material.
    Rubio EI; Bassignani MJ; White MA; Brant WE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):W319-22. PubMed ID: 18492872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.