673 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26045510)
1. Do questions help? The impact of audience response systems on medical student learning: a randomised controlled trial.
Mains TE; Cofrancesco J; Milner SM; Shah NG; Goldberg H
Postgrad Med J; 2015 Jul; 91(1077):361-7. PubMed ID: 26045510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of differing Audience Response System question types on student attention in the veterinary medical classroom.
Rush BR; Hafen M; Biller DS; Davis EG; Klimek JA; Kukanich B; Larson RL; Roush JK; Schermerhorn T; Wilkerson MJ; White BJ
J Vet Med Educ; 2010; 37(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 20576903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An audience response system may influence student performance on anatomy examination questions.
Hoyt A; McNulty JA; Gruener G; Chandrasekhar A; Espiritu B; Ensminger D; Price R; Naheedy R
Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(6):295-9. PubMed ID: 20890951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Audience response systems in medical student education benefit learners and presenters.
Nayak L; Erinjeri JP
Acad Radiol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 18348839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Examining the impact of audience response systems on student performance in anatomy education: a randomised controlled trial.
Fergusson SJ; Aka JJ; Hennessy CM; Wilson AJ; Parson SH; Harrison EM; Finn GM; Gillingwater TH
Scott Med J; 2018 Feb; 63(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 29911503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electronic voting to encourage interactive lectures: a randomised trial.
Duggan PM; Palmer E; Devitt P
BMC Med Educ; 2007 Jul; 7():25. PubMed ID: 17655773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An audience response system strategy to improve student motivation, attention, and feedback.
Cain J; Black EP; Rohr J
Am J Pharm Educ; 2009 Apr; 73(2):21. PubMed ID: 19513159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of using an audience response system on learning, motivation and information retention in the orthodontic teaching of undergraduate dental students: a cross-over trial.
Dhaliwal HK; Allen M; Kang J; Bates C; Hodge T
J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 42(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 25849094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Audience response systems: technology to engage learners.
Collins J
J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Sep; 5(9):993-1000. PubMed ID: 18755440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Novel educational approach for medical students: improved retention rates using interactive medical software compared with traditional lecture-based format.
Subramanian A; Timberlake M; Mittakanti H; Lara M; Brandt ML
J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(2):253-6. PubMed ID: 22365876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phone-based audience response system as an adjunct in orthodontic teaching of undergraduate dental students: a cross-over randomised controlled trial.
Alharbi F; Alazmi KF; El Momani BR; Al-Muzian L; Wertheimer M; Almukhtar A; Almuzian M
BMC Med Educ; 2020 Nov; 20(1):435. PubMed ID: 33198761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using an audience response system (ARS) in a face-to-face and distance education CPT/HCPCS coding course.
Harris ST; Zeng X
Perspect Health Inf Manag; 2010 Jan; 7(Winter):1f. PubMed ID: 20697463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lecture recording system in anatomy: possible benefit to auditory learners.
Bacro TR; Gebregziabher M; Ariail J
Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(6):376-84. PubMed ID: 23508921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Self-directed learning can outperform direct instruction in the course of a modern German medical curriculum - results of a mixed methods trial.
Peine A; Kabino K; Spreckelsen C
BMC Med Educ; 2016 Jun; 16():158. PubMed ID: 27256081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips.
Caldwell JE
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2007; 6(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 17339389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-based teaching is as good as face to face lecture-based teaching of evidence based medicine: a randomised controlled trial.
Davis J; Chryssafidou E; Zamora J; Davies D; Khan K; Coomarasamy A
BMC Med Educ; 2007 Jul; 7():23. PubMed ID: 17659076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the effect of interactive audience response systems on the perceived learning experience of nursing students.
Porter AG; Tousman S
J Nurs Educ; 2010 Sep; 49(9):523-7. PubMed ID: 20509583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Audience-response systems for evaluation of pediatric lectures--comparison with a classic end-of-term online-based evaluation.
Bode SF; Straub C; Giesler M; Biller S; Forster J; Krüger M
GMS Z Med Ausbild; 2015; 32(2):Doc18. PubMed ID: 26038683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-aided vs. tutor-delivered teaching of exposure therapy for phobia/panic: randomized controlled trial with pre-registration nursing students.
Gega L; Norman IJ; Marks IM
Int J Nurs Stud; 2007 Mar; 44(3):397-405. PubMed ID: 16631177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of an audience response system on resident learning and retention of lecture material.
Rubio EI; Bassignani MJ; White MA; Brant WE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):W319-22. PubMed ID: 18492872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
