324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26045549)
1. Delayed Start Versus Conventional GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Poor Responders Pretreated With Estradiol in Luteal Phase: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Maged AM; Nada AM; Abohamila F; Hashem AT; Mostafa WA; Elzayat AR
Reprod Sci; 2015 Dec; 22(12):1627-31. PubMed ID: 26045549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger in oocyte donors co-treated with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist: a dose-finding study.
Vuong TN; Ho MT; Ha TD; Phung HT; Huynh GB; Humaidan P
Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):356-63. PubMed ID: 26523330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized trial of microdose leuprolide acetate protocol versus luteal phase ganirelix protocol in predicted poor responders.
DiLuigi AJ; Engmann L; Schmidt DW; Benadiva CA; Nulsen JC
Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(8):2531-3. PubMed ID: 21324455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation is a feasible method for poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer treatment compared to a GnRH antagonist protocol: A retrospective study.
Wei LH; Ma WH; Tang N; Wei JH
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 55(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 26927248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Letrozole and gonadotropins versus luteal estradiol and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in women with a prior low response to ovarian stimulation.
Elassar A; Engmann L; Nulsen J; Benadiva C
Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(7):2330-4. PubMed ID: 21514582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus progestin for the prevention of premature luteinising hormone surges in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilisation treatment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Wang Y; Kuang Y; Chen Q; Cai R
Trials; 2018 Aug; 19(1):455. PubMed ID: 30134964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does the "delayed start" protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist improve the pregnancy outcome in Bologna poor responders? a randomized clinical trial.
Ashrafi M; Arabipoor A; Yahyaei A; Zolfaghari Z; Ghaffari F
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2018 Dec; 16(1):124. PubMed ID: 30593268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Flexibility in starting ovarian stimulation at different phases of the menstrual cycle for treatment of infertile women with the use of in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Qin N; Chen Q; Hong Q; Cai R; Gao H; Wang Y; Sun L; Zhang S; Guo H; Fu Y; Ai A; Tian H; Lyu Q; Daya S; Kuang Y
Fertil Steril; 2016 Aug; 106(2):334-341.e1. PubMed ID: 27114329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrashort gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist combined with flexible multidose gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist for poor responders in in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer programs.
Orvieto R; Kruchkovich J; Rabinson J; Zohav E; Anteby EY; Meltcer S
Fertil Steril; 2008 Jul; 90(1):228-30. PubMed ID: 17681292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual trigger with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and standard dose human chorionic gonadotropin to improve oocyte maturity rates.
Griffin D; Feinn R; Engmann L; Nulsen J; Budinetz T; Benadiva C
Fertil Steril; 2014 Aug; 102(2):405-9. PubMed ID: 24842671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 450 IU versus 600 IU gonadotropin for controlled ovarian stimulation in poor responders: a randomized controlled trial.
Lefebvre J; Antaki R; Kadoch IJ; Dean NL; Sylvestre C; Bissonnette F; Benoit J; Ménard S; Lapensée L
Fertil Steril; 2015 Dec; 104(6):1419-25. PubMed ID: 26361207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of luteal phase vaginal estradiol supplementation on the success of in vitro fertilization treatment: a prospective randomized study.
Engmann L; DiLuigi A; Schmidt D; Benadiva C; Maier D; Nulsen J
Fertil Steril; 2008 Mar; 89(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 17678651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cycle day, estrogen level, and lead follicle size: analysis of 27,790 in vitro fertilization cycles to determine optimal start criteria for gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist.
Lyttle Schumacher BM; Mersereau JE; Steiner AZ
Fertil Steril; 2018 Apr; 109(4):633-637. PubMed ID: 29605403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Protocol of GNRH antagonist in poor responders in IVF-ET cycles].
Grzechocińska B; Fracki S; Marianowski P; Dworniak T; Bablok L; Marianowski L
Ginekol Pol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):943-8. PubMed ID: 14674149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Initiation of ovarian stimulation independent of the menstrual cycle: a case-control study.
Buendgen NK; Schultze-Mosgau A; Cordes T; Diedrich K; Griesinger G
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Oct; 288(4):901-4. PubMed ID: 23545834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intranasal gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) for luteal-phase support following GnRHa triggering, a novel approach to avoid ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in high responders.
Bar-Hava I; Mizrachi Y; Karfunkel-Doron D; Omer Y; Sheena L; Carmon N; Ben-David G
Fertil Steril; 2016 Aug; 106(2):330-3. PubMed ID: 27114332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does the addition of growth hormone to the in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection antagonist protocol improve outcomes in poor responders? A randomized, controlled trial.
Bassiouny YA; Dakhly DMR; Bayoumi YA; Hashish NM
Fertil Steril; 2016 Mar; 105(3):697-702. PubMed ID: 26690008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimal stimulation protocol using letrozole versus microdose flare up GnRH agonist protocol in women with poor ovarian response undergoing ICSI.
Mohsen IA; El Din RE
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2013 Feb; 29(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 23134528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dual trigger with combination of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin significantly improves the live-birth rate for normal responders in GnRH-antagonist cycles.
Lin MH; Wu FS; Lee RK; Li SH; Lin SY; Hwu YM
Fertil Steril; 2013 Nov; 100(5):1296-302. PubMed ID: 23993928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is the modified natural in vitro fertilization cycle justified in patients with "genuine" poor response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation?
Kedem A; Tsur A; Haas J; Yerushalmi GM; Hourvitz A; Machtinger R; Orvieto R
Fertil Steril; 2014 Jun; 101(6):1624-8. PubMed ID: 24680364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
