These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26045954)

  • 1. Modeling ecological traps for the control of feral pigs.
    Dexter N; McLeod SR
    Ecol Evol; 2015 May; 5(10):2036-47. PubMed ID: 26045954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The ethological trap: functional and numerical responses of highly efficient invasive predators driving prey extinctions.
    Spencer RJ; Van Dyke JU; Thompson MB
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Oct; 26(7):1969-1983. PubMed ID: 27755718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing the relative influence of instrinsic and extrinsic variation in food availability on feral pig populations in Australia's rangelands.
    Choquenot D
    J Anim Ecol; 1998 Nov; 67(6):887-907. PubMed ID: 26412369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Space use and habitat selection of an invasive mesopredator and sympatric, native apex predator.
    Wysong ML; Hradsky BA; Iacona GD; Valentine LE; Morris K; Ritchie EG
    Mov Ecol; 2020; 8():18. PubMed ID: 32391154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Utilization of sugarcane habitat by feral pig (Sus scrofa) in northern tropical Queensland: evidence from the stable isotope composition of hair.
    Wurster CM; Robertson J; Westcott DA; Dryden B; Zazzo A; Bird MI
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e43538. PubMed ID: 22957029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Achilles heel of a powerful invader: restrictions on distribution and disappearance of feral pigs from a protected area in Northern Pantanal, Western Brazil.
    Cordeiro JLP; Hofmann GS; Fonseca C; Oliveira LFB
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e4200. PubMed ID: 29340234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chapter 4. Susceptibility of sharks, rays and chimaeras to global extinction.
    Field IC; Meekan MG; Buckworth RC; Bradshaw CJ
    Adv Mar Biol; 2009; 56():275-363. PubMed ID: 19895977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Compensatory immigration depends on adjacent population size and habitat quality but not on landscape connectivity.
    Turgeon K; Kramer DL
    J Anim Ecol; 2012 Nov; 81(6):1161-1170. PubMed ID: 22548493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of an attractive sink leading into maladaptive habitat selection.
    Delibes M; Gaona P; Ferreras P
    Am Nat; 2001 Sep; 158(3):277-85. PubMed ID: 18707324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Source Areas as a Key Factor Contributing to the Recovery Time of Controlled Feral Pigeon (
    Farfán Aguilar MÁ; Duarte J; Díaz-Ruiz F
    Animals (Basel); 2022 Apr; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 35565483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of density-dependent dispersal in source-sink dynamics.
    Amarasekare P
    J Theor Biol; 2004 Jan; 226(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 14643185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extinction debt in local habitats: quantifying the roles of random drift, immigration and emigration.
    Wu Y; Chen Y; Chang SC; Chen YF; Shen TJ
    R Soc Open Sci; 2020 Jan; 7(1):191039. PubMed ID: 32218937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predation, habitat complexity, and variation in density-dependent mortality of temperate reef fishes.
    Johnson DW
    Ecology; 2006 May; 87(5):1179-88. PubMed ID: 16761597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inferential and forward projection modeling to evaluate options for controlling invasive mammals on islands.
    Anderson DP; McMurtrie P; Edge KA; Baxter PW; Byrom AE
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Dec; 26(8):2546-2557. PubMed ID: 27880019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inferring invasive species abundance using removal data from management actions.
    Davis AJ; Hooten MB; Miller RS; Farnsworth ML; Lewis J; Moxcey M; Pepin KM
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Oct; 26(7):2339-2346. PubMed ID: 27755739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does introduced fauna influence soil erosion? A field and modelling assessment.
    Hancock GR; Lowry JB; Dever C; Braggins M
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Jun; 518-519():189-200. PubMed ID: 25756674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating population density for disease risk assessment: The importance of understanding the area of influence of traps using wild pigs as an example.
    Davis AJ; Leland B; Bodenchuk M; VerCauteren KC; Pepin KM
    Prev Vet Med; 2017 Jun; 141():33-37. PubMed ID: 28532991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of habitat fragmentation on persistence of source-sink metapopulations in systems with predators and prey or apparent competitors.
    Namba T; Umemoto A; Minami E
    Theor Popul Biol; 1999 Aug; 56(1):123-37. PubMed ID: 10438673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding the Role of Sink Patches in Source-Sink Metapopulations: Reed Warbler in an Agricultural Landscape.
    Foppen RPB; Chardon JP; Liefveld W
    Conserv Biol; 2000 Dec; 14(6):1881-1892. PubMed ID: 35701934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Camera traps and activity signs to estimate wild boar density and derive abundance indices.
    Massei G; Coats J; Lambert MS; Pietravalle S; Gill R; Cowan D
    Pest Manag Sci; 2018 Apr; 74(4):853-860. PubMed ID: 29024317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.