These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26046026)

  • 1. Trend of posterior teeth restoration at ibadan, Nigeria.
    Gbadebo SO; Anifowose OO; Ogunrinde TJ
    J West Afr Coll Surg; 2013; 3(4):70-83. PubMed ID: 26046026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth.
    Rasines Alcaraz MG; Veitz-Keenan A; Sahrmann P; Schmidlin PR; Davis D; Iheozor-Ejiofor Z
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; (3):CD005620. PubMed ID: 24683067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent posterior teeth.
    Worthington HV; Khangura S; Seal K; Mierzwinski-Urban M; Veitz-Keenan A; Sahrmann P; Schmidlin PR; Davis D; Iheozor-Ejiofor Z; Rasines Alcaraz MG
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Aug; 8(8):CD005620. PubMed ID: 34387873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A study of primary teeth restored by intracoronal restorations in children participating in an undergraduate teaching programme at Cork University Dental School and Hospital, Ireland.
    Hurley E; Da Mata C; Stewart C; Kinirons M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 25793959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency of restoration replacement in posterior teeth for U.S. Navy and Marine Corps personnel.
    Laccabue M; Ahlf RL; Simecek JW
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 23802636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study.
    Borgia E; Baron R; Borgia JL
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e195-e203. PubMed ID: 28513897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two different matrix band systems in restoring two surface cavities in posterior teeth done by senior undergraduate students at Qassim University, Saudi Arabia: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
    ; Ahmad MZ; Gaikwad RN; Arjumand B
    Indian J Dent Res; 2018; 29(4):459-464. PubMed ID: 30127197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].
    De Moor R; Delmé K
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endodontic complications after plastic restorations in general practice.
    Whitworth JM; Myers PM; Smith J; Walls AW; McCabe JF
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 15910477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Knowledge and attitudes of general dental practitioners towards posterior composite restorations in northern saudi arabia.
    Akbar I
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Feb; 9(2):ZC61-4. PubMed ID: 25859528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with combined composite-amalgam restorations.
    Geiger S; Paikin L; Gorfil C; Gordon M
    Quintessence Int; 2008 Feb; 39(2):e58-62. PubMed ID: 18560642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Resin Composite Versus Amalgam Restorations Placed in United States Dental Schools.
    Alreshaid L; El-Badrawy W; Kulkarni G; Santos MJ; Prakki A
    Oper Dent; 2023 Jan; 48(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 36472481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
    Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Amalgam phase down: baseline data preceding implementation in Nigeria.
    Umesi DC; Oremosu OA; Makanjuola JO
    Int Dent J; 2020 Jun; 70(3):161-166. PubMed ID: 31811657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of reasons for replacement of amalgam vs composite posterior restorations.
    Al-Asmar AA; Ha Sabrah A; Abd-Raheam IM; Ismail NH; Oweis YG
    Saudi Dent J; 2023 Mar; 35(3):275-281. PubMed ID: 37091274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The frequency of replacement of dental restorations may vary based on a number of variables, including type of material, size of the restoration, and caries risk of the patient.
    Roumanas ED
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2010 Mar; 10(1):23-4. PubMed ID: 20230960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth.
    Qualtrough AJ; Cawte SG; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. WITHDRAWN: Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
    Yengopal V; Harnekar SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 10(10):CD004483. PubMed ID: 27748505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
    Yengopal V; Harneker SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
    Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.