These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26046424)

  • 1. The kind of group you want to belong to: Effects of group structure on group accuracy.
    Jönsson ML; Hahn U; Olsson EJ
    Cognition; 2015 Sep; 142():191-204. PubMed ID: 26046424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wisdom of crowds and collective decision-making in a survival situation with complex information integration.
    Hamada D; Nakayama M; Saiki J
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Oct; 5(1):48. PubMed ID: 33057843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Network dynamics of social influence in the wisdom of crowds.
    Becker J; Brackbill D; Centola D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Jun; 114(26):E5070-E5076. PubMed ID: 28607070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Demographically diverse crowds are typically not much wiser than homogeneous crowds.
    de Oliveira S; Nisbett RE
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Feb; 115(9):2066-2071. PubMed ID: 29440376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of network topology on cooperative problem-solving systems.
    Fontanari JF; Rodrigues FA
    Theory Biosci; 2016 Sep; 135(3):101-10. PubMed ID: 26607723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The wisdom of select crowds.
    Mannes AE; Soll JB; Larrick RP
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2014 Aug; 107(2):276-99. PubMed ID: 25090129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integration of Social Information by Human Groups.
    Granovskiy B; Gold JM; Sumpter DJ; Goldstone RL
    Top Cogn Sci; 2015 Jul; 7(3):469-93. PubMed ID: 26189568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Social learning strategies modify the effect of network structure on group performance.
    Barkoczi D; Galesic M
    Nat Commun; 2016 Oct; 7():13109. PubMed ID: 27713417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How social information can improve estimation accuracy in human groups.
    Jayles B; Kim HR; Escobedo R; Cezera S; Blanchet A; Kameda T; Sire C; Theraulaz G
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Nov; 114(47):12620-12625. PubMed ID: 29118142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Propagation of innovations in networked groups.
    Mason WA; Jones A; Goldstone RL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):422-33. PubMed ID: 18729708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What Differences Make a Difference? The Promise and Reality of Diverse Teams in Organizations.
    Mannix E; Neale MA
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2005 Oct; 6(2):31-55. PubMed ID: 26158478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Group discussion improves lie detection.
    Klein N; Epley N
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jun; 112(24):7460-5. PubMed ID: 26015581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptive social networks promote the wisdom of crowds.
    Almaatouq A; Noriega-Campero A; Alotaibi A; Krafft PM; Moussaid M; Pentland A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 May; 117(21):11379-11386. PubMed ID: 32393632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decision accuracy in complex environments is often maximized by small group sizes.
    Kao AB; Couzin ID
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Jun; 281(1784):20133305. PubMed ID: 24759858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Self-serving incentives impair collective decisions by increasing conformity.
    Bazazi S; von Zimmermann J; Bahrami B; Richardson D
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224725. PubMed ID: 31725758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Social learning strategies regulate the wisdom and madness of interactive crowds.
    Toyokawa W; Whalen A; Laland KN
    Nat Hum Behav; 2019 Feb; 3(2):183-193. PubMed ID: 30944445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does discussion make crowds any wiser?
    Mercier H; Claidière N
    Cognition; 2022 May; 222():104912. PubMed ID: 34620497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Counteracting estimation bias and social influence to improve the wisdom of crowds.
    Kao AB; Berdahl AM; Hartnett AT; Lutz MJ; Bak-Coleman JB; Ioannou CC; Giam X; Couzin ID
    J R Soc Interface; 2018 Apr; 15(141):. PubMed ID: 29669894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Messy conversations and the willingness to be disturbed.
    Kerfoot K
    Nurs Econ; 2002; 20(6):297-9. PubMed ID: 12567933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Collective induction without cooperation? Learning and knowledge transfer in cooperative groups and competitive auctions.
    Maciejovsky B; Budescu DV
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 May; 92(5):854-70. PubMed ID: 17484609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.