512 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26046490)
1. Trends in Cervical Cytology Screening and Reporting Practices: Results From the College of American Pathologists 2011 PAP Education Supplemental Questionnaire.
Crothers BA; Darragh TM; Tambouret RH; Nayar R; Barkan GA; Zhao C; Booth CN; Padmanabhan V; Tabatabai ZL; Souers RJ; Thomas N; Wilbur DC; Moriarty AT
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Jan; 140(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 26046490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bethesda 2001 implementation and reporting rates: 2003 practices of participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology.
Davey DD; Neal MH; Wilbur DC; Colgan TJ; Styer PE; Mody DR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2004 Nov; 128(11):1224-9. PubMed ID: 15504056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of monitoring interpretive rates, concordance between cytotechnologist and pathologist interpretations before sign-out, and turnaround time in gynecologic cytology quality assurance: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference working group 1.
Clary KM; Davey DD; Naryshkin S; Austin RM; Thomas N; Chmara BA; Sugrue C; Tworek J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Feb; 137(2):164-74. PubMed ID: 23368858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. False-positive Papanicolaou (PAP) test rates in the College of American Pathologists PAP education and PAP proficiency test programs: evaluation of false-positive responses of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or cancer to a negative reference diagnosis.
Crothers BA; Booth CN; Darragh TM; Zhao C; Souers RJ; Thomas N; Moriarty AT
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 May; 138(5):613-9. PubMed ID: 24786119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective and retrospective review of gynecologic cytopathology: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference working group 2.
Brainard JA; Birdsong GG; Elsheikh TM; Hartley DA; Naik K; Neal MH; Souers RJ; Henry MR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Feb; 137(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 23368859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Current laboratory practices of participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory. Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology.
Davey DD; Nielsen ML; Naryshkin S; Robb JA; Cohen T; Kline TS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 May; 120(5):440-4. PubMed ID: 8639046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monitoring and ordering practices for human papillomavirus in cervical cytology: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference working group 5.
Booth CN; Bashleben C; Filomena CA; Means MM; Wasserman PG; Souers RJ; Henry MR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Feb; 137(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 23368863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. General quality practices in gynecologic cytopathology: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference working group 3.
Tworek J; Nayar R; Savaloja L; Tabbara S; Thomas N; Winkler B; Howell LP
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Feb; 137(2):190-8. PubMed ID: 23368861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trends in Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology Practices: Results From a College of American Pathologists 2016 Practice Survey.
Mais DD; Crothers BA; Davey DD; Natale KE; Nayar R; Souers RJ; Blond BJ; Hackman S; Tworek JA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2019 Nov; 143(11):1364-1372. PubMed ID: 31100017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cytopathology laboratory improvement programs of the College of American Pathologists: Laboratory Accreditation Program (CAP LAP) and Performance Improvement Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology (CAP PAP).
Nielsen ML
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 9111112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of proficiency testing in ensuring quality: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference working group 3.
Howell LP; Nayar R; Savaloja L; Tabbara S; Thomas N; Winkler B; Tworek J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Feb; 137(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 23368860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bethesda 2014 Implementation and Human Papillomavirus Primary Screening: Practices of Laboratories Participating in the College of American Pathologists PAP Education Program.
Davey DD; Souers RJ; Goodrich K; Mody DR; Tabbara SO; Booth CN
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2019 Oct; 143(10):1196-1202. PubMed ID: 31021657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Practices of participants in the college of american pathologists interlaboratory comparison program in cervicovaginal cytology, 2006.
Eversole GM; Moriarty AT; Schwartz MR; Clayton AC; Souers R; Fatheree LA; Chmara BA; Tench WD; Henry MR; Wilbur DC
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 Mar; 134(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 20196659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality improvement opportunities in gynecologic cytologic-histologic correlations: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference working group 4.
Crothers BA; Jones BA; Cahill LA; Moriarty AT; Mody DR; Tench WD; Souers RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Feb; 137(2):199-213. PubMed ID: 23368862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cytologic features of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in thinprep papanicolaou test slides and conventional smears: comparison of cases that performed poorly with those that performed well in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology.
Renshaw AA; Dubray-Benstein B; Haja J; Hughes JH;
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Jan; 129(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 15628904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Unsatisfactory reporting rates: 2006 practices of participants in the college of american pathologists interlaboratory comparison program in gynecologic cytology.
Moriarty AT; Clayton AC; Zaleski S; Henry MR; Schwartz MR; Eversole GM; Tench WD; Fatheree LA; Souers RJ; Wilbur DC
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 Dec; 133(12):1912-6. PubMed ID: 19961244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Which are more correctly diagnosed: conventional Papanicolaou smears or Thinprep samples? A comparative study of 9 years of external quality-assurance testing.
Cummings MC; Marquart L; Pelecanos AM; Perkins G; Papadimos D; O'Rourke P; Ross JA
Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 25487287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The potential for failure in gynecologic regulatory proficiency testing with current slide validation criteria: results from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison in Gynecologic Cytology Program.
; Young NA; Moriarty AT; Walsh MK; Wang E; Wilbur DC
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Aug; 130(8):1114-8. PubMed ID: 16879010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Papanicolaou tests with mixed high-grade and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion features: distinct performance in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytopathology.
Renshaw AA; Mody DR; Styer P; Schwartz M; Ducatman B; Colgan TJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Apr; 130(4):456-9. PubMed ID: 16594738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gynecologic cytology proficiency testing failures: what have we learned?: observations from the college of american pathologists gynecologic cytology proficiency testing program.
Ducatman BS; Bentz JS; Fatheree LA; Souers R; Ostrowski S; Moriarty AT; Henry M; Laucirica R; Booth CN; Wilbur DC
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1442-6. PubMed ID: 22032572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
