These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26047007)

  • 1. Issues and challenges for pedestrian active safety systems based on real world accidents.
    Hamdane H; Serre T; Masson C; Anderson R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Sep; 82():53-60. PubMed ID: 26047007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimated benefit of automated emergency braking systems for vehicle-pedestrian crashes in the United States.
    Haus SH; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S171-S176. PubMed ID: 31381447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differential benefit of sensor system field-of-view and range in pedestrian automated emergency braking systems.
    Haus SH; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(sup1):S111-S115. PubMed ID: 34469208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Real life safety benefits of increasing brake deceleration in car-to-pedestrian accidents: Simulation of Vacuum Emergency Braking.
    Jeppsson H; Östling M; Lubbe N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Feb; 111():311-320. PubMed ID: 29257980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of Integrated Pedestrian Protection Systems with Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) and Passive Safety Components.
    Edwards M; Nathanson A; Carroll J; Wisch M; Zander O; Lubbe N
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S2-S11. PubMed ID: 26027971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimate of potential benefit for Europe of fitting Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) systems for pedestrian protection to passenger cars.
    Edwards M; Nathanson A; Wisch M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S173-82. PubMed ID: 25307384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of automated emergency braking system's avoidance of pedestrian crashes at intersections under occluded conditions within a virtual simulator.
    Abdel-Aty M; Cai Q; Wu Y; Zheng O
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Oct; 176():106797. PubMed ID: 35964393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simulating Automated Emergency Braking with and without Torricelli Vacuum Emergency Braking for cyclists: Effect of brake deceleration and sensor field-of-view on accidents, injuries and fatalities.
    Jeppsson H; Lubbe N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jul; 142():105538. PubMed ID: 32470821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects on crash risk of automatic emergency braking systems for pedestrians and bicyclists.
    Kullgren A; Amin K; Tingvall C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(sup1):S111-S115. PubMed ID: 37267014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. AEB effectiveness evaluation based on car-to-cyclist accident reconstructions using video of drive recorder.
    Zhao Y; Ito D; Mizuno K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(1):100-106. PubMed ID: 30822153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating automated emergency braking performance in simulated car-to-two-wheeler crashes in China: A comparison between C-NCAP tests and in-depth crash data.
    Sui B; Lubbe N; Bärgman J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106229. PubMed ID: 34225169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and evaluation of potential accident scenarios involving pedestrians and AEB-equipped vehicles to demonstrate the efficiency of an enhanced open-source simulation framework.
    Schachner M; Sinz W; Thomson R; Klug C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105831. PubMed ID: 33125925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of automatic emergency braking systems on pedestrian crash risk.
    Cicchino JB
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jul; 172():106686. PubMed ID: 35580401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pedestrian injury mitigation by autonomous braking.
    Rosén E; Källhammer JE; Eriksson D; Nentwich M; Fredriksson R; Smith K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):1949-57. PubMed ID: 20728647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrated assessment of pedestrian head impact protection in testing secondary safety and autonomous emergency braking.
    Searson DJ; Anderson RW; Hutchinson TP
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Feb; 63():1-8. PubMed ID: 24246294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Market penetration of intersection AEB: Characterizing avoided and residual straight crossing path accidents.
    Sander U; Lubbe N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():178-188. PubMed ID: 29604516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pedestrian crash causation analysis and active safety system calibration.
    Ye C; Wang X; Morris A; Ying Z
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Feb; 195():107404. PubMed ID: 38042009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective assessment of the effectiveness of autonomous emergency braking in car-to-cyclist accidents in France.
    Chajmowicz H; Saadé J; Cuny S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S20-S25. PubMed ID: 31750740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Potential benefits of controlled vehicle braking to reduce pedestrian ground contact injuries.
    Zou T; Shang S; Simms C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():94-107. PubMed ID: 31132748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A robust estimation of the effects of motorcycle autonomous emergency braking (MAEB) based on in-depth crashes in Australia.
    Savino G; Mackenzie J; Allen T; Baldock M; Brown J; Fitzharris M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():66-72. PubMed ID: 27586105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.