288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26047652)
1. Final pathohistology after radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance (AS).
Lellig E; Gratzke C; Kretschmer A; Stief C
World J Urol; 2015 Jul; 33(7):917-22. PubMed ID: 26047652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radical prostatectomy for impalpable prostate cancer: the Johns Hopkins experience with tumors found on transurethral resection (stages T1A and T1B) and on needle biopsy (stage T1C).
Epstein JI; Walsh PC; Brendler CB
J Urol; 1994 Nov; 152(5 Pt 2):1721-9. PubMed ID: 7523719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incidence of upgrading and upstaging in patients with low-volume Gleason score 3+4 prostate cancers at biopsy: finding a new group eligible for active surveillance.
Park HJ; Ha YS; Park SY; Kim YT; Lee TY; Kim JH; Lee DH; Kim WJ; Kim IY
Urol Int; 2013; 90(3):301-5. PubMed ID: 23391718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.
Oh JJ; Hong SK; Lee JK; Lee BK; Lee S; Kwon OS; Byun SS; Lee SE
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E494-9. PubMed ID: 22540236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
Jin BS; Kang SH; Kim DY; Oh HG; Kim CI; Moon GH; Kwon TG; Park JS
Korean J Urol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):624-9. PubMed ID: 26366274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adverse pathological findings in needle biopsy gleason score 6 prostate cancers with low and intermediate preoperative PSA levels following radical prostatectomy.
Heidegger I; Ladurner M; Skradski V; Klocker H; Schäfer G; Horninger W; Bektic J
Anticancer Res; 2012 Dec; 32(12):5481-5. PubMed ID: 23225455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.
Keefe DT; Schieda N; El Hallani S; Breau RH; Morash C; Robertson SJ; Mai KT; Belanger EC; Flood TA
Virchows Arch; 2015 Oct; 467(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26229020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Discrepancy between Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score in Patients with Prostate Cancer.
Abedi AR; Basiri A; Shakhssalim N; Sadri G; Ahadi M; Hojjati SA; Sheykhzadeh S; Askarpour S; Ghiasy S
Urol J; 2020 Aug; 18(4):395-399. PubMed ID: 32798231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of a new nomogram to predict insignificant prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Kim TH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Choi HY; Lee HM
Scand J Urol; 2017 Feb; 51(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 28168924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria.
Mitsuzuka K; Narita S; Koie T; Kaiho Y; Tsuchiya N; Yoneyama T; Kakoi N; Kawamura S; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Ohyama C; Arai Y
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):914-20. PubMed ID: 23320782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prostate needle biopsies: multiple variables are predictive of final tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Poulos CK; Daggy JK; Cheng L
Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(3):527-32. PubMed ID: 15274065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer.
Epstein JI; Walsh PC; Carmichael M; Brendler CB
JAMA; 1994 Feb; 271(5):368-74. PubMed ID: 7506797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A solitary positive prostate cancer biopsy does not predict a unilateral lesion in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Koie T; Mitsuzuka K; Narita S; Yoneyama T; Kawamura S; Kaiho Y; Tsuchiya N; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Arai Y; Ohyama C
Scand J Urol; 2015 Apr; 49(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 25165894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting prostate carcinoma volume and stage at radical prostatectomy by assessing needle biopsy specimens for percent surface area and cores positive for carcinoma, perineural invasion, Gleason score, DNA ploidy and proliferation, and preoperative serum prostate specific antigen: a report of 454 cases.
Sebo TJ; Cheville JC; Riehle DL; Lohse CM; Pankratz VS; Myers RP; Blute ML; Zincke H
Cancer; 2001 Jun; 91(11):2196-204. PubMed ID: 11391602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate volume effect on Gleason score upgrading in active surveillance appropriate patients.
Çamur E; Coşkun A; Kavukoğlu Ӧ; Can U; Kara Ö; Develi Çamur A; Sarıca K; Narter KF
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2019 Jul; 91(2):. PubMed ID: 31266273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Limitations in Predicting Organ Confined Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Perlis N; Sayyid R; Evans A; Van Der Kwast T; Toi A; Finelli A; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Zlotta AR; Trachtenberg J; Ghai S; Fleshner NE
J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 27457260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How accurate is our clinical prediction of "minimal prostate cancer"?
Leibovici D; Shikanov S; Gofrit ON; Zagaja GP; Shilo Y; Shalhav AL
Isr Med Assoc J; 2013 Jul; 15(7):359-63. PubMed ID: 23943981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
