589 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26047762)
1. Use of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Clinical Practice: Not as Good as We Once Thought.
Aydelotte JD; Ali J; Huynh PT; Coopwood TB; Uecker JM; Brown CV
J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Jul; 221(1):215-9. PubMed ID: 26047762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Role of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in the Diagnosis of Choledocholithiasis: Do Benefits Outweigh the Costs?
Ward WH; Fluke LM; Hoagland BD; Zarow GJ; Held JM; Ricca RL
Am Surg; 2015 Jul; 81(7):720-5. PubMed ID: 26140894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones].
Norero E; Norero B; Huete A; Pimentel F; Cruz F; Ibáñez L; Martínez J; Jarufe N
Rev Med Chil; 2008 May; 136(5):600-5. PubMed ID: 18769807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis: analysis of patients with negative MRCP.
Chang JH; Lee IS; Lim YS; Jung SH; Paik CN; Kim HK; Kim TH; Kim CW; Han SW; Choi MG; Jung IS
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2012 Feb; 47(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 22149906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparative study of ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in common duct stones].
Miao L; Fan ZN; Ji GZ; Wen W; Wang X; Xiong GY; Jiang GB; Wang M; Liu Z; Wu P
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 46(19):1465-7. PubMed ID: 19094622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation between MRCP and ERCP findings at a tertiary care hospital.
Rahman R; Ju J; Shamma's J; Goebel S; Sundaram U
W V Med J; 2010; 106(5):14-9. PubMed ID: 21739880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The detection of bile duct stones in suspected biliary pancreatitis: comparison of MRCP, ERCP, and intraductal US.
Moon JH; Cho YD; Cha SW; Cheon YK; Ahn HC; Kim YS; Kim YS; Lee JS; Lee MS; Lee HK; Shim CS; Kim BS
Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 May; 100(5):1051-7. PubMed ID: 15842578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Hintze RE; Adler A; Veltzke W; Abou-Rebyeh H; Hammerstingl R; Vogl T; Felix R
Endoscopy; 1997 Mar; 29(3):182-7. PubMed ID: 9201467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of MRCP in choledocholithiasis.
Guarise A; Baltieri S; Mainardi P; Faccioli N
Radiol Med; 2005 Mar; 109(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 15775893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases.
Lomanto D; Pavone P; Laghi A; Panebianco V; Mazzocchi P; Fiocca F; Lezoche E; Passariello R; Speranza V
Am J Surg; 1997 Jul; 174(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 9240949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.
Griffin N; Wastle ML; Dunn WK; Ryder SD; Beckingham IJ
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2003 Jul; 15(7):809-13. PubMed ID: 12811312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the exclusion of choledocholithiasis.
Hjartarson JH; Hannesson P; Sverrisson I; Blöndal S; Ívarsson B; Björnsson ES
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 51(10):1249-56. PubMed ID: 27181286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis.
Calvo MM; Bujanda L; Calderón A; Heras I; Cabriada JL; Bernal A; Orive V; Capelastegi A
Mayo Clin Proc; 2002 May; 77(5):422-8. PubMed ID: 12004991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Controversial issues in biliary pancreatitis: when should we perform MRCP and ERCP?
Cavdar F; Yildar M; Tellioğlu G; Kara M; Tilki M; Titiz Mİ
Pancreatology; 2014; 14(5):411-4. PubMed ID: 25200693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography Still Plays a Role in the Preoperative Evaluation of Choledocholithiasis and Biliary Pathology.
Kanaan Z; Antaki F
J Am Coll Surg; 2016 Mar; 222(3):325-6. PubMed ID: 26922606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography to detect bile duct stones in acute biliary pancreatitis.
Lee SL; Kim HK; Choi HH; Jeon BS; Kim TH; Choi JM; Ku YM; Kim SW; Kim SS; Chae HS
Pancreatology; 2018 Jan; 18(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 29246689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Role of MR cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of biliary disease].
Iannicelli E; Sessa B; Argnani L; Galluzzo A; David V
Clin Ter; 2006; 157(5):425-9. PubMed ID: 17147050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic value of MRCP and indications for ERCP.
Sakai Y; Tsuyuguchi T; Tsuchiya S; Sugiyama H; Miyakawa K; Ebara M; Saisho H; Yokosuka O
Hepatogastroenterology; 2007 Dec; 54(80):2212-5. PubMed ID: 18265635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.
Varghese JC; Liddell RP; Farrell MA; Murray FE; Osborne H; Lee MJ
Clin Radiol; 1999 Sep; 54(9):604-14. PubMed ID: 10505997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Value of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Clinical Practice.
Engelbrecht M; Rauws E; Besselink M
J Am Coll Surg; 2016 Mar; 222(3):328. PubMed ID: 26922608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
