These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26047973)

  • 1. From hands to feet: Abstract response representations in distractor-response bindings.
    Moeller B; Hommel B; Frings C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jul; 159():69-75. PubMed ID: 26047973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Five shades of grey: Generalization in distractor-based retrieval of S-R episodes.
    Singh T; Moeller B; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2307-2312. PubMed ID: 27631631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distractor-based stimulus-response bindings retrieve decisions independent of motor programs.
    Nett N; Bröder A; Frings C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Nov; 171():57-64. PubMed ID: 27665268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses and previous targets: experimental dissociations of distractor-response and distractor-target bindings.
    Giesen C; Rothermund K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):645-659. PubMed ID: 24294915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The structure of distractor-response bindings: Conditions for configural and elemental integration.
    Moeller B; Frings C; Pfister R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Apr; 42(4):464-79. PubMed ID: 26501840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Separating after-effects of target and distractor processing in the tactile sensory modality.
    Wesslein AK; Moeller B; Frings C; Giesen C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Apr; 81(3):809-822. PubMed ID: 30628034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response-response binding across effector-set switches.
    Moeller B; Frings C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Dec; 26(6):1974-1979. PubMed ID: 31654376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distractor inhibition: Evidence from lateralized readiness potentials.
    Pramme L; Dierolf AM; Naumann E; Frings C
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Aug; 98():74-81. PubMed ID: 26114922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inhibition of irrelevant response codes is affected by matching target-distractor modalities.
    Möller M; Mayr S; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Feb; 45(2):189-208. PubMed ID: 30589356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contextual modulation of prime response retrieval processes: Evidence from auditory negative priming.
    Mayr S; Möller M; Buchner A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):1918-1931. PubMed ID: 30094603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Components of competitor priming in task switching.
    Teskey ML; Masson MEJ
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Nov; 45(8):1384-1397. PubMed ID: 28718172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor-response bindings.
    Giesen C; Frings C; Rothermund K
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Apr; 40(3):373-87. PubMed ID: 22081277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Repetition effects in action planning reflect effector- but not hemisphere-specific coding.
    Seegelke C; Schonard C; Heed T
    J Neurophysiol; 2021 Dec; 126(6):2001-2013. PubMed ID: 34788180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using temporal EEG signal decomposition to identify specific neurophysiological correlates of distractor-response bindings proposed by the theory of event coding.
    Opitz A; Beste C; Stock AK
    Neuroimage; 2020 Apr; 209():116524. PubMed ID: 31926281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Binding targets' responses to distractors' locations: distractor response bindings in a location-priming task.
    Frings C; Möller B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Nov; 72(8):2176-83. PubMed ID: 21097861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Explaining response-repetition effects in task switching: evidence from switching cue modality suggests episodic binding and response inhibition.
    Koch I; Frings C; Schuch S
    Psychol Res; 2018 May; 82(3):570-579. PubMed ID: 28286905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictability reduces event file retrieval.
    Schmalbrock P; Hommel B; Münchau A; Beste C; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 May; 85(4):1073-1087. PubMed ID: 36577916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early and Late Electrophysiological Effects of Distractor Frequency in Picture Naming: Reconciling Input and Output Accounts.
    Riès SK; Fraser D; McMahon KL; de Zubicaray GI
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Oct; 27(10):1936-47. PubMed ID: 26042502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retrieval of event files can be conceptually mediated.
    Frings C; Moeller B; Rothermund K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 May; 75(4):700-9. PubMed ID: 23392625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The level of representation of irrelevant stimuli-Distractor-response binding within and between the senses.
    Laub R; Merz S; Dröschel H; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jul; 83(5):2256-2266. PubMed ID: 33768482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.