442 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26048598)
1. CCLasso: correlation inference for compositional data through Lasso.
Fang H; Huang C; Zhao H; Deng M
Bioinformatics; 2015 Oct; 31(19):3172-80. PubMed ID: 26048598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. gmcoda: Graphical model for multiple compositional vectors in microbiome studies.
Fang H
Bioinformatics; 2023 Nov; 39(11):. PubMed ID: 37975866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Compositional data network analysis via lasso penalized D-trace loss.
Yuan H; He S; Deng M
Bioinformatics; 2019 Sep; 35(18):3404-3411. PubMed ID: 31220226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inference of Environmental Factor-Microbe and Microbe-Microbe Associations from Metagenomic Data Using a Hierarchical Bayesian Statistical Model.
Yang Y; Chen N; Chen T
Cell Syst; 2017 Jan; 4(1):129-137.e5. PubMed ID: 28125788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. fastCCLasso: a fast and efficient algorithm for estimating correlation matrix from compositional data.
Zhang S; Fang H; Hu T
Bioinformatics; 2024 May; 40(5):. PubMed ID: 38730540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct interaction network inference for compositional data via codaloss.
Chen L; He S; Zhai Y; Deng M
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2020 Dec; 18(6):2050037. PubMed ID: 33106076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Phylogeny-based classification of microbial communities.
Tanaseichuk O; Borneman J; Jiang T
Bioinformatics; 2014 Feb; 30(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 24369151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. gCoda: Conditional Dependence Network Inference for Compositional Data.
Fang H; Huang C; Zhao H; Deng M
J Comput Biol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):699-708. PubMed ID: 28489411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Species classifier choice is a key consideration when analysing low-complexity food microbiome data.
Walsh AM; Crispie F; O'Sullivan O; Finnegan L; Claesson MJ; Cotter PD
Microbiome; 2018 Mar; 6(1):50. PubMed ID: 29554948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis and correction of compositional bias in sparse sequencing count data.
Kumar MS; Slud EV; Okrah K; Hicks SC; Hannenhalli S; Corrada Bravo H
BMC Genomics; 2018 Nov; 19(1):799. PubMed ID: 30400812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Compositional data analysis of the microbiome: fundamentals, tools, and challenges.
Tsilimigras MC; Fodor AA
Ann Epidemiol; 2016 May; 26(5):330-5. PubMed ID: 27255738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Processing a 16S rRNA Sequencing Dataset with the Microbiome Helper Workflow.
Douglas GM; Comeau AM; Langille MGI
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1849():131-141. PubMed ID: 30298252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigating microbial co-occurrence patterns based on metagenomic compositional data.
Ban Y; An L; Jiang H
Bioinformatics; 2015 Oct; 31(20):3322-9. PubMed ID: 26079350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DACE: a scalable DP-means algorithm for clustering extremely large sequence data.
Jiang L; Dong Y; Chen N; Chen T
Bioinformatics; 2017 Mar; 33(6):834-842. PubMed ID: 28025198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comprehensive evaluation of the sl1p pipeline for 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis.
Whelan FJ; Surette MG
Microbiome; 2017 Aug; 5(1):100. PubMed ID: 28807046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MixMC: A Multivariate Statistical Framework to Gain Insight into Microbial Communities.
Lê Cao KA; Costello ME; Lakis VA; Bartolo F; Chua XY; Brazeilles R; Rondeau P
PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160169. PubMed ID: 27513472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Temporal probabilistic modeling of bacterial compositions derived from 16S rRNA sequencing.
Äijö T; Müller CL; Bonneau R
Bioinformatics; 2018 Feb; 34(3):372-380. PubMed ID: 28968799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sparse and compositionally robust inference of microbial ecological networks.
Kurtz ZD; Müller CL; Miraldi ER; Littman DR; Blaser MJ; Bonneau RA
PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 May; 11(5):e1004226. PubMed ID: 25950956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tax4Fun: predicting functional profiles from metagenomic 16S rRNA data.
Aßhauer KP; Wemheuer B; Daniel R; Meinicke P
Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2882-4. PubMed ID: 25957349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of sequencing platforms and bioinformatics pipelines for compositional analysis of the gut microbiome.
Allali I; Arnold JW; Roach J; Cadenas MB; Butz N; Hassan HM; Koci M; Ballou A; Mendoza M; Ali R; Azcarate-Peril MA
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):194. PubMed ID: 28903732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
