These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26048903)

  • 1. A new framework of statistical inferences based on the valid joint sampling distribution of the observed counts in an incomplete contingency table.
    Tian GL; Li HQ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1712-1736. PubMed ID: 26048903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Valid statistical inference methods for a case-control study with missing data.
    Tian GL; Zhang C; Jiang X
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Apr; 27(4):1001-1023. PubMed ID: 27199234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The score test for independence in R x C contingency tables with missing data.
    Lipsitz SR; Fitzmaurice GM
    Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):751-62. PubMed ID: 8672711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Confidence intervals for the risk ratio under inverse sampling.
    Tian M; Tang ML; Ng HK; Chan PS
    Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(17):3301-24. PubMed ID: 18069723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Weighted profile likelihood-based confidence interval for the difference between two proportions with paired binomial data.
    Pradhan V; Saha KK; Banerjee T; Evans JC
    Stat Med; 2014 Jul; 33(17):2984-97. PubMed ID: 24599527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parameter estimation from incomplete data in binomial regression when the missing data mechanism is nonignorable.
    Ibrahim JG; Lipsitz SR
    Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):1071-8. PubMed ID: 8805768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The analysis of 2 x 1 and 2 x 2 contingency tables: an historical review.
    Richardson JT
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1994; 3(2):107-33. PubMed ID: 7952428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chi 2 tests: how useful are they in the analysis of medical research data?
    Osborn JF
    Ann Ig; 1989; 1(3-4):417-32. PubMed ID: 2483622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Continued fraction representation for expected cell counts of a 2 x 2 table: a rapid and exact method for conditional maximum likelihood estimation.
    Satten GA; Kupper LL
    Biometrics; 1990 Mar; 46(1):217-23. PubMed ID: 2350569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of bootstrap approaches for estimating uncertainty of parameters in linear mixed-effects models.
    Thai HT; Mentré F; Holford NH; Veyrat-Follet C; Comets E
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(3):129-40. PubMed ID: 23457061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Power comparison of two-sided exact tests for association in 2 x 2 contingency tables using standard, mid p and randomized test versions.
    Lydersen S; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3859-71. PubMed ID: 14673943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Score and profile likelihood confidence intervals for contingency table parameters.
    Lang JB
    Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(28):5975-90. PubMed ID: 18720351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Small-sample confidence sets for the MTD in a phase I clinical trial.
    Storer BE
    Biometrics; 1993 Dec; 49(4):1117-25. PubMed ID: 8117905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantile-function based null distribution in resampling based multiple testing.
    van der Laan MJ; Hubbard AE
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article14. PubMed ID: 17049025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Corrected profile likelihood confidence interval for binomial paired incomplete data.
    Pradhan V; Menon S; Das U
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 23296487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Closed-form estimates for missing counts in two-way contingency tables.
    Baker SG; Rosenberger WF; Dersimonian R
    Stat Med; 1992 Mar; 11(5):643-57. PubMed ID: 1594807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of epidemiologic case-base studies for binary data.
    Nurminen M
    Stat Med; 1989 Oct; 8(10):1241-54. PubMed ID: 2814072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequentist performance of Bayesian confidence intervals for comparing proportions in 2 x 2 contingency tables.
    Agresti A; Min Y
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):515-23. PubMed ID: 16011699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Confidence interval construction for the difference between two correlated proportions with missing observations.
    Tang NS; Li HQ; Tang ML; Li J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(2):323-38. PubMed ID: 25632882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Confidence limits for the population prevalence rate based on the negative binomial distribution.
    Lui KJ
    Stat Med; 1995 Jul; 14(13):1471-7. PubMed ID: 7481185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.