421 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26050025)
1. Load to failure of different titanium abutments for an internal hexagon implant.
Yilmaz B; Salaita LG; Seidt JD; Clelland NL; McGlumphy EA
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):513-6. PubMed ID: 26050025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Load to failure of different zirconia abutments for an internal hexagon implant.
Yilmaz B; Salaita LG; Seidt JD; McGlumphy EA; Clelland NL
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):373-7. PubMed ID: 25976709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Strain analysis of 9 different abutments for cement-retained crowns on an internal hexagonal implant.
Salaita LG; Yilmaz B; Seidt JD; Clelland NL; Chien HH; McGlumphy EA
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Aug; 118(2):166-171. PubMed ID: 28126354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro performance of zirconia and titanium implant/abutment systems for anterior application.
Rosentritt M; Hagemann A; Hahnel S; Behr M; Preis V
J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):1019-26. PubMed ID: 24699071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An in vitro comparison of fracture load of zirconia custom abutments with internal connection and different angulations and thickness: part I.
Albosefi A; Finkelman M; Zandparsa R
J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):296-301. PubMed ID: 24417713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of fatigue loading and failure mode of different ceramic implant abutments.
Cárdenas R; Sánchez D; Euán R; Flores AM
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):875-881. PubMed ID: 33483141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study.
Stimmelmayr M; Edelhoff D; Güth JF; Erdelt K; Happe A; Beuer F
Dent Mater; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1215-20. PubMed ID: 23021964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Ceramic versus Titanium Implant Abutments and Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
Sghaireen MG
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 24118925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro performance of implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns: Influence of patient-specific tooth-coloured abutments with titanium adhesive bases.
Rosentritt M; Rembs A; Behr M; Hahnel S; Preis V
J Dent; 2015 Jul; 43(7):839-45. PubMed ID: 25953721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dental implant-abutment fracture resistance and wear induced by single-unit screw-retained CAD components fabricated by four CAM methods after mechanical cycling.
Markarian RA; Galles DP; França FMG
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):450-457. PubMed ID: 33640089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture Resistance of Single-Unit Implant-Supported Crowns: Effects of Prosthetic Design and Restorative Material.
Donmez MB; Diken Turksayar AA; Olcay EO; Sahmali SM
J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):348-355. PubMed ID: 34383979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experimental research on the relationship between fit accuracy and fracture resistance of zirconia abutments.
Sui X; Wei H; Wang D; Han Y; Deng J; Wang Y; Wang J; Yang J
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1353-9. PubMed ID: 24561040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Postfatigue fracture resistance of modified prefabricated zirconia implant abutments.
Alqahtani F; Flinton R
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):299-305. PubMed ID: 24461943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections.
Seetoh YL; Tan KB; Chua EK; Quek HC; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):797-806. PubMed ID: 21841990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
