These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26050532)

  • 1. Predictive validity of the Braden Scale for pressure ulcer risk in hospitalized patients.
    Park SH; Choi YK; Kang CB
    J Tissue Viability; 2015 Aug; 24(3):102-13. PubMed ID: 26050532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Predictive validity of the Braden Scale for pressure ulcer risk: a meta-analysis].
    Park SH; Park YS
    J Korean Acad Nurs; 2014 Dec; 44(6):595-607. PubMed ID: 25608538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing Predictive Validity of Pressure Ulcer Risk Scales- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Park SH; Lee HS
    Iran J Public Health; 2016 Feb; 45(2):122-33. PubMed ID: 27114977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Braden Scale cannot be used alone for assessing pressure ulcer risk in surgical patients: a meta-analysis.
    He W; Liu P; Chen HL
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2012 Feb; 58(2):34-40. PubMed ID: 22316631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Meta-analysis to Evaluate the Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment in Long-term Care.
    Chen HL; Shen WQ; Liu P
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Sep; 62(9):20-8. PubMed ID: 27668477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk in Critical Care: A Meta-Analysis.
    Wei M; Wu L; Chen Y; Fu Q; Chen W; Yang D
    Nurs Crit Care; 2020 May; 25(3):165-170. PubMed ID: 31985893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.
    Kwong E; Pang S; Wong T; Ho J; Shao-ling X; Li-jun T
    Appl Nurs Res; 2005 May; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15991112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing predictive validity of the modified Braden scale for prediction of pressure ulcer risk of orthopaedic patients in an acute care setting.
    Chan WS; Pang SM; Kwong EW
    J Clin Nurs; 2009 Jun; 18(11):1565-73. PubMed ID: 19490294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Braden scale (ALB) for assessing pressure ulcer risk in hospital patients: A validity and reliability study.
    Chen HL; Cao YJ; Zhang W; Wang J; Huai BS
    Appl Nurs Res; 2017 Feb; 33():169-174. PubMed ID: 28096013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictive validity of the braden scale for pressure injury risk assessment in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Huang C; Ma Y; Wang C; Jiang M; Yuet Foon L; Lv L; Han L
    Nurs Open; 2021 Sep; 8(5):2194-2207. PubMed ID: 33630407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive accuracy of the Braden Q Scale in risk assessment for paediatric pressure ulcer: A meta-analysis.
    Liao Y; Gao G; Mo L
    Int J Nurs Sci; 2018 Oct; 5(4):419-426. PubMed ID: 31406858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A clinical trial of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk.
    Bergstrom N; Demuth PJ; Braden BJ
    Nurs Clin North Am; 1987 Jun; 22(2):417-28. PubMed ID: 3554150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictive validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk in elderly residents of long-term care facilities.
    de Souza DM; Santos VL; Iri HK; Sadasue Oguri MY
    Geriatr Nurs; 2010; 31(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 20381710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting pressure ulcer risk in pediatric patients: the Braden Q Scale.
    Curley MA; Razmus IS; Roberts KE; Wypij D
    Nurs Res; 2003; 52(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 12552172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. All at-risk patients are not created equal: analysis of Braden pressure ulcer risk scores to identify specific risks.
    Tescher AN; Branda ME; Byrne TJ; Naessens JM
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2012; 39(3):282-91. PubMed ID: 22552104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictive and concurrent validity of the Braden scale in long-term care: a meta-analysis.
    Wilchesky M; Lungu O
    Wound Repair Regen; 2015; 23(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 25682792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pilot study compares scores of the Resident Assessment Instrument Minimum Data Set Version 2.0 (MDS 2.0) Pressure Ulcer Risk Scale with the Braden Pressure Ulcer Risk assessment for patients in complex continuing care.
    Carreau L; Niezgoda H; Trainor A; Parent M; Woodbury MG
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2015 Jan; 28(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 25502973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictive validity of the Braden Scale, Norton Scale, and Waterlow Scale in the Czech Republic.
    Šateková L; Žiaková K; Zeleníková R
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2017 Feb; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 27874258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors affecting the predictive validity of the Braden Scale.
    Capobianco ML; McDonald DD
    Adv Wound Care; 1996; 9(6):32-6. PubMed ID: 9069754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictors of hospital acquired heel pressure ulcers.
    Tourtual DM; Riesenberg LA; Korutz CJ; Semo AH; Asef A; Talati K; Gill RD
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1997 Oct; 43(9):24-8, 30, 32-4 passim. PubMed ID: 9369740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.