These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

522 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26052348)

  • 21. Advanced fingerprint methods for similarity searching: balancing molecular complexity effects.
    Wang Y; Bajorath J
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2010 Mar; 13(3):220-8. PubMed ID: 20230370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of multianalyte proficiency test results by sum of ranking differences, principal component analysis, and hierarchical cluster analysis.
    Škrbić B; Héberger K; Durišić-Mladenović N
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2013 Oct; 405(25):8363-75. PubMed ID: 23912826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relevance of feature combinations for similarity searching using general or activity class-directed molecular fingerprints.
    Lounkine E; Hu Y; Batista J; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Mar; 49(3):561-70. PubMed ID: 19434896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Can eye-tracking metrics be used to better pair radiologists in a mammogram reading task?
    Gandomkar Z; Tay K; Brennan PC; Kozuch E; Mello-Thoms C
    Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):4844-4856. PubMed ID: 30168153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Analysis of the effects of related fingerprints on molecular similarity using an eigenvalue entropy approach.
    Kuwahara H; Gao X
    J Cheminform; 2021 Mar; 13(1):27. PubMed ID: 33757582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How similar are similarity searching methods? A principal component analysis of molecular descriptor space.
    Bender A; Jenkins JL; Scheiber J; Sukuru SC; Glick M; Davies JW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jan; 49(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 19123924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ranking metrics in gene set enrichment analysis: do they matter?
    Zyla J; Marczyk M; Weiner J; Polanska J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 May; 18(1):256. PubMed ID: 28499413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Activity-relevant similarity values for fingerprints and implications for similarity searching.
    Jasial S; Hu Y; Vogt M; Bajorath J
    F1000Res; 2016; 5():. PubMed ID: 27127620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Erratum: High-Throughput Identification of Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. Tomato in Tomato using Seedling Flood Assay.
    J Vis Exp; 2023 Oct; (200):. PubMed ID: 37851522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Large scale study of multiple-molecule queries.
    Nasr RJ; Swamidass SJ; Baldi PF
    J Cheminform; 2009 Jun; 1(1):7. PubMed ID: 20298525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Similarity metrics for ligands reflecting the similarity of the target proteins.
    Schuffenhauer A; Floersheim P; Acklin P; Jacoby E
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(2):391-405. PubMed ID: 12653501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Binary similarity measures for fingerprint analysis of qualitative metabolomic profiles.
    Rácz A; Andrić F; Bajusz D; Héberger K
    Metabolomics; 2018; 14(3):29. PubMed ID: 29568246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Support-vector-machine-based ranking significantly improves the effectiveness of similarity searching using 2D fingerprints and multiple reference compounds.
    Geppert H; Horváth T; Gärtner T; Wrobel S; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Apr; 48(4):742-6. PubMed ID: 18318473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. MetMaxStruct: A Tversky-Similarity-Based Strategy for Analysing the (Sub)Structural Similarities of Drugs and Endogenous Metabolites.
    O'Hagan S; Kell DB
    Front Pharmacol; 2016; 7():266. PubMed ID: 27597830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sum of ranking differences (SRD) to ensemble multivariate calibration model merits for tuning parameter selection and comparing calibration methods.
    Kalivas JH; Héberger K; Andries E
    Anal Chim Acta; 2015 Apr; 869():21-33. PubMed ID: 25818136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Analysis and display of the size dependence of chemical similarity coefficients.
    Holliday JD; Salim N; Whittle M; Willett P
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(3):819-28. PubMed ID: 12767139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Neighborhood behavior of in silico structural spaces with respect to in vitro activity spaces--a benchmark for neighborhood behavior assessment of different in silico similarity metrics.
    Horvath D; Jeandenans C
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(2):691-8. PubMed ID: 12653539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Agreement between ranking metrics in network meta-analysis: an empirical study.
    Chiocchia V; Nikolakopoulou A; Papakonstantinou T; Egger M; Salanti G
    BMJ Open; 2020 Aug; 10(8):e037744. PubMed ID: 32819946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.
    Filges T; Sonne-Schmidt CS; Nielsen BCV
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):1-107. PubMed ID: 37131395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.