247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26052956)
1. Meta-analysis of a continuous outcome combining individual patient data and aggregate data: a method based on simulated individual patient data.
Yamaguchi Y; Sakamoto W; Goto M; Staessen JA; Wang J; Gueyffier F; Riley RD
Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):322-51. PubMed ID: 26052956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Meta-analysis of continuous outcomes combining individual patient data and aggregate data.
Riley RD; Lambert PC; Staessen JA; Wang J; Gueyffier F; Thijs L; Boutitie F
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(11):1870-93. PubMed ID: 18069721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mixed treatment comparisons using aggregate and individual participant level data.
Saramago P; Sutton AJ; Cooper NJ; Manca A
Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(28):3516-36. PubMed ID: 22764016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Network meta-analysis combining individual patient and aggregate data from a mixture of study designs with an application to pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Thom HH; Capkun G; Cerulli A; Nixon RM; Howard LS
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Apr; 15():34. PubMed ID: 25887646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the consistency assumption by exploring treatment by covariate interactions in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis: individual patient-level covariates versus aggregate trial-level covariates.
Donegan S; Williamson P; D'Alessandro U; Tudur Smith C
Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(29):3840-57. PubMed ID: 22786621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multivariate meta-analysis using individual participant data.
Riley RD; Price MJ; Jackson D; Wardle M; Gueyffier F; Wang J; Staessen JA; White IR
Res Synth Methods; 2015 Jun; 6(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 26099484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: Using pseudo IPD created from aggregate data to adjust for baseline imbalance and assess treatment-by-baseline modification.
Papadimitropoulou K; Stijnen T; Riley RD; Dekkers OM; le Cessie S
Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):780-794. PubMed ID: 32643264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A linearization approach for the model-based analysis of combined aggregate and individual patient data.
Ravva P; Karlsson MO; French JL
Stat Med; 2014 Apr; 33(9):1460-76. PubMed ID: 24488864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. One-stage individual participant data meta-analysis models: estimation of treatment-covariate interactions must avoid ecological bias by separating out within-trial and across-trial information.
Hua H; Burke DL; Crowther MJ; Ensor J; Tudur Smith C; Riley RD
Stat Med; 2017 Feb; 36(5):772-789. PubMed ID: 27910122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combining individual patient data and aggregate data in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis: Individual patient data may be beneficial if only for a subset of trials.
Donegan S; Williamson P; D'Alessandro U; Garner P; Smith CT
Stat Med; 2013 Mar; 32(6):914-30. PubMed ID: 22987606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of aggregate and individual participant data approaches to meta-analysis of randomised trials: An observational study.
Tierney JF; Fisher DJ; Burdett S; Stewart LA; Parmar MKB
PLoS Med; 2020 Jan; 17(1):e1003019. PubMed ID: 32004320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficient two-step multivariate random effects meta-analysis of individual participant data for longitudinal clinical trials using mixed effects models.
Noma H; Maruo K; Gosho M; Levine SZ; Goldberg Y; Leucht S; Furukawa TA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Feb; 19(1):33. PubMed ID: 30764757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. One-stage random effects meta-analysis using linear mixed models for aggregate continuous outcome data.
Papadimitropoulou K; Stijnen T; Dekkers OM; le Cessie S
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Sep; 10(3):360-375. PubMed ID: 30523676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of one-stage vs two-stage individual patient data meta-analysis methods: A simulation study.
Kontopantelis E
Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):417-430. PubMed ID: 29786975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bias and precision of methods for estimating the difference in restricted mean survival time from an individual patient data meta-analysis.
Lueza B; Rotolo F; Bonastre J; Pignon JP; Michiels S
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Mar; 16():37. PubMed ID: 27025706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis and Network Meta-Analysis.
Freeman SC
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2345():279-298. PubMed ID: 34550597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Statistical approaches to identify subgroups in meta-analysis of individual participant data: a simulation study.
Belias M; Rovers MM; Reitsma JB; Debray TPA; IntHout J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Sep; 19(1):183. PubMed ID: 31477023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An overview of methods and empirical comparison of aggregate data and individual patient data results for investigating heterogeneity in meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes.
Smith CT; Williamson PR; Marson AG
J Eval Clin Pract; 2005 Oct; 11(5):468-78. PubMed ID: 16164588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of one-step and two-step meta-analysis models using individual patient data.
Mathew T; Nordström K
Biom J; 2010 Apr; 52(2):271-87. PubMed ID: 20349448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
