These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1099 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26052958)

  • 1. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency.
    Pham MT; Rajić A; Greig JD; Sargeant JM; Papadopoulos A; McEwen SA
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):371-85. PubMed ID: 26052958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting.
    Colquhoun HL; Levac D; O'Brien KK; Straus S; Tricco AC; Perrier L; Kastner M; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Dec; 67(12):1291-4. PubMed ID: 25034198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews.
    Tricco AC; Lillie E; Zarin W; O'Brien K; Colquhoun H; Kastner M; Levac D; Ng C; Sharpe JP; Wilson K; Kenny M; Warren R; Wilson C; Stelfox HT; Straus SE
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Feb; 16():15. PubMed ID: 26857112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Study protocol for a scoping review on rehabilitation scoping reviews.
    Colquhoun HL; Jesus TS; O'Brien KK; Tricco AC; Chui A; Zarin W; Lillie E; Hitzig SL; Straus S
    Clin Rehabil; 2017 Sep; 31(9):1249-1256. PubMed ID: 28118743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scoping reviews in occupational therapy: the what, why, and how to.
    McKinstry C; Brown T; Gustafsson L
    Aust Occup Ther J; 2014 Apr; 61(2):58-66. PubMed ID: 24125011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team's experience with Arksey and O'Malley's framework.
    Daudt HM; van Mossel C; Scott SJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Mar; 13():48. PubMed ID: 23522333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Evidence-Based Approach to Scoping Reviews.
    Khalil H; Peters M; Godfrey CM; McInerney P; Soares CB; Parker D
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2016 Apr; 13(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 26821833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A scoping review on the methodological and reporting quality of scoping reviews in China.
    Xue X; Tang X; Liu S; Yu T; Chen Z; Chen N; Yu J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Feb; 24(1):45. PubMed ID: 38389063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Health information needs, source preferences and engagement behaviours of women with metastatic breast cancer across the care continuum: protocol for a scoping review.
    Tucker CA; Martin MP; Jones RB
    BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013619. PubMed ID: 28213599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mismatches in the production of a scoping review: Highlighting the interplay of (in)formalities.
    Sager M; Pistone I
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2019 Dec; 25(6):930-937. PubMed ID: 31368185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scoping Review on Rehabilitation Scoping Reviews.
    Colquhoun HL; Jesus TS; O'Brien KK; Tricco AC; Chui A; Zarin W; Lillie E; Hitzig SL; Seaton S; Engel L; Rotenberg S; Straus SE
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Aug; 101(8):1462-1469. PubMed ID: 32325163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology.
    Levac D; Colquhoun H; O'Brien KK
    Implement Sci; 2010 Sep; 5():69. PubMed ID: 20854677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Same family, different species: methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis.
    Tricco AC; Zarin W; Ghassemi M; Nincic V; Lillie E; Page MJ; Shamseer L; Antony J; Rios P; Hwee J; Veroniki AA; Moher D; Hartling L; Pham B; Straus SE
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Apr; 96():133-142. PubMed ID: 29103958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advancing scoping study methodology: a web-based survey and consultation of perceptions on terminology, definition and methodological steps.
    O'Brien KK; Colquhoun H; Levac D; Baxter L; Tricco AC; Straus S; Wickerson L; Nayar A; Moher D; O'Malley L
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Jul; 16():305. PubMed ID: 27461419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature.
    Davis K; Drey N; Gould D
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1386-400. PubMed ID: 19328488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From Arksey and O'Malley and Beyond: Customizations to enhance a team-based, mixed approach to scoping review methodology.
    Westphaln KK; Regoeczi W; Masotya M; Vazquez-Westphaln B; Lounsbury K; McDavid L; Lee H; Johnson J; Ronis SD
    MethodsX; 2021; 8():101375. PubMed ID: 34430271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Defining Rapid Reviews: a systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews.
    Hamel C; Michaud A; Thuku M; Skidmore B; Stevens A; Nussbaumer-Streit B; Garritty C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Jan; 129():74-85. PubMed ID: 33038541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Overview of a formal scoping review on health system report cards.
    Brien SE; Lorenzetti DL; Lewis S; Kennedy J; Ghali WA
    Implement Sci; 2010 Jan; 5():2. PubMed ID: 20205791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Methods of evidence mapping. A systematic review].
    Schmucker C; Motschall E; Antes G; Meerpohl JJ
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2013 Oct; 56(10):1390-7. PubMed ID: 23978984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding scoping reviews: Definition, purpose, and process.
    Peterson J; Pearce PF; Ferguson LA; Langford CA
    J Am Assoc Nurse Pract; 2017 Jan; 29(1):12-16. PubMed ID: 27245885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 55.