These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26052979)

  • 1. Developmental changes in misinterpretation of garden-path wh-questions in French.
    Lassotta R; Omaki A; Franck J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):829-54. PubMed ID: 26052979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scope-marking strategies in the acquisition of long distance wh-questions in French and Dutch.
    Jakubowicz C; Strik N
    Lang Speech; 2008; 51(Pt 1-2):101-32. PubMed ID: 18561546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wh-Questions, Universal Statements and Free Choice Inferences in Child Mandarin.
    Huang H; Zhou P; Crain S
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Dec; 47(6):1391-1409. PubMed ID: 29147832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What is it that lingers? Garden-path (mis)interpretations in younger and older adults.
    Malyutina S; den Ouden DB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):880-906. PubMed ID: 25920901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On-line processing of English which-questions by children and adults: a visual world paradigm study.
    Contemori C; Carlson M; Marinis T
    J Child Lang; 2018 Mar; 45(2):415-441. PubMed ID: 28738910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Syntactic and referential processes in second-language learners: event-related brain potential evidence.
    Isel F
    Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1885-9. PubMed ID: 18007180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developing incrementality in filler-gap dependency processing.
    Atkinson E; Wagers MW; Lidz J; Phillips C; Omaki A
    Cognition; 2018 Oct; 179():132-149. PubMed ID: 29936344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Processing Load Imposed by Line Breaks in English Temporal Wh-Questions.
    Hirotani M; Terry JM; Sadato N
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1465. PubMed ID: 27774072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension.
    Tooley KM; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 19210079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies.
    Phillips C; Kazanina N; Abada SH
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):407-28. PubMed ID: 15722211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Syntactic Creativity Errors in Children's Wh-Questions.
    Lutken CJ; Legendre G; Omaki A
    Cogn Sci; 2020 Jul; 44(7):e12849. PubMed ID: 32608064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The syntax of questions in child English.
    Radford A
    J Child Lang; 1994 Feb; 21(1):211-36. PubMed ID: 8006092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of maternal input in the development of wh-question comprehension in autism and typical development.
    Goodwin A; Fein D; Naigles L
    J Child Lang; 2015 Jan; 42(1):32-63. PubMed ID: 24461930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Training wh-question production in agrammatic aphasia: analysis of argument and adjunct movement.
    Thompson CK; Shapiro LP; Tait ME; Jacobs BJ; Schneider SL
    Brain Lang; 1996 Jan; 52(1):175-228. PubMed ID: 8741981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preschool children's interpretation of object-initial sentences: neural correlates of their behavioral performance.
    Schipke CS; Knoll LJ; Friederici AD; Oberecker R
    Dev Sci; 2012 Nov; 15(6):762-74. PubMed ID: 23106730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The comprehension and production of Wh-questions in deaf and hard-of-hearing children.
    Friedmann N; Szterman R
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2011; 16(2):212-35. PubMed ID: 21220767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Argument status and PP-attachment.
    Boland JE; Blodgett A
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2006 Sep; 35(5):385-403. PubMed ID: 16838129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Online revision process in clause-boundary garden-path sentences.
    Fujita H
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Jan; 52(1):73-90. PubMed ID: 37468668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do verb bias effects on sentence production reflect sensitivity to comprehension or production factors?
    Ferreira VS; Schotter ER
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Aug; 66(8):1548-71. PubMed ID: 23286581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patterns of syntactic development in children with Williams syndrome and Down's syndrome: evidence from passives and wh-questions.
    Joffe V; Varlokosta S
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2007 Sep; 21(9):705-27. PubMed ID: 17701757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.