219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26053113)
1. Three-dimensional Laparoscopy: Does Improved Visualization Decrease the Learning Curve Among Trainees in Advanced Procedures?
Cologne KG; Zehetner J; Liwanag L; Cash C; Senagore AJ; Lipham JC
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2015 Aug; 25(4):321-3. PubMed ID: 26053113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using three-dimensional laparoscopy as a novel training tool for novice trainees compared with two-dimensional laparoscopy.
Chiu CJ; Lobo Prabhu K; Tan-Tam CC; Panton ON; Meneghetti A
Am J Surg; 2015 May; 209(5):824-827.e1; discussion 827. PubMed ID: 25795176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Skills Comparison in Pediatric Residents Using a 2-Dimensional versus a 3-Dimensional High-Definition Camera in a Pediatric Laparoscopic Simulator.
Guanà R; Ferrero L; Garofalo S; Cerrina A; Cussa D; Arezzo A; Schleef J
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(4):644-649. PubMed ID: 28039097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of 3D in the training of basic laparoscopic skills and its transferability to 2D environment: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Poudel S; Kurashima Y; Watanabe Y; Ebihara Y; Tamoto E; Murakami S; Nakamura T; Tsuchikawa T; Okamura K; Shichinohe T; Hirano S
Surg Endosc; 2017 Mar; 31(3):1111-1118. PubMed ID: 27351662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changing the Learning Curve in Novice Laparoscopists: Incorporating Direct Visualization into the Simulation Training Program.
Dawidek MT; Roach VA; Ott MC; Wilson TD
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(1):30-36. PubMed ID: 27717706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The learning effect of using stereoscopic vision in the early phase of laparoscopic surgical training for novices.
Harada H; Kanaji S; Nishi M; Otake Y; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Matsuda Y; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Oshikiri T; Sumi Y; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Sato Y; Kakeji Y
Surg Endosc; 2018 Feb; 32(2):582-588. PubMed ID: 28643059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopy training of novices with complex curved instruments using 2D- and 3D-visualization.
Hidding J; Bucher J; Heiliger C; Andrade D; Trupka L; Halmen M; Werner J; Karcz K; Frank A
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2024 Apr; 409(1):109. PubMed ID: 38570339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is a robotic system really better than the three-dimensional laparoscopic system in terms of suturing performance?: comparison among operators with different levels of experience.
Park YS; Oo AM; Son SY; Shin DJ; Jung DH; Ahn SH; Park DJ; Kim HH
Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1485-90. PubMed ID: 26139502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 2D Versus 3D in Laparoscopic Surgery by Beginners and Experts: A Randomized Controlled Trial on a Pelvitrainer in Objectively Graded Surgical Steps.
Spille J; Wenners A; von Hehn U; Maass N; Pecks U; Mettler L; Alkatout I
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(5):867-877. PubMed ID: 28215494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional vs standard laparoscopy: comparative assessment using a validated program for laparoscopic urologic skills.
Cicione A; Autorino R; Breda A; De Sio M; Damiano R; Fusco F; Greco F; Carvalho-Dias E; Mota P; Nogueira C; Pinho P; Mirone V; Correia-Pinto J; Rassweiler J; Lima E
Urology; 2013 Dec; 82(6):1444-50. PubMed ID: 24094658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An assessment of the new generation three-dimensional high definition laparoscopic vision system on surgical skills: a randomized prospective study.
Usta TA; Ozkaynak A; Kovalak E; Ergul E; Naki MM; Kaya E
Surg Endosc; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2305-13. PubMed ID: 25414065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A secondary learning curve in 3D versus 2D imaging in laparoscopic training of surgical novices.
Kang ML; Wong CMJ; Tan H; Bohari A; Han TO; Soon Y
Surg Endosc; 2021 Mar; 35(3):1046-1051. PubMed ID: 32112254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distraction and proficiency in laparoscopy: 2D versus robotic console 3D immersion.
Kim S; May A; Ryan H; Mohsin A; Tsuda S
Surg Endosc; 2017 Nov; 31(11):4625-4630. PubMed ID: 28409364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of passive polarizing three-dimensional displays on surgical performance for experienced laparoscopic surgeons.
Smith R; Schwab K; Day A; Rockall T; Ballard K; Bailey M; Jourdan I
Br J Surg; 2014 Oct; 101(11):1453-9. PubMed ID: 25131843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Suggestion on How to Compare 2D and 3D Laparoscopy: A Qualitative Analysis of the Literature and Randomized Pilot Study.
Zundel S; Lehnick D; Heyne-Pietschmann M; Trück M; Szavay P
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Jan; 29(1):114-120. PubMed ID: 30256710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-Dimensional (3D) Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.
Currò G; La Malfa G; Caizzone A; Rampulla V; Navarra G
Obes Surg; 2015 Nov; 25(11):2120-4. PubMed ID: 25893652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 3D straight-stick laparoscopy versus 3D robotics for task performance in novice surgeons: a randomised crossover trial.
Shakir F; Jan H; Kent A
Surg Endosc; 2016 Dec; 30(12):5380-5387. PubMed ID: 27059971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of stereoscopic visualization on surgical skill acquisition in novices.
Mistry M; Roach VA; Wilson TD
J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(5):563-70. PubMed ID: 24016365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of single incision laparoscopic surgery "low-fidelity" simulation training.
Frigenza M; Tran A; Breaud J; Fournier JP; Bongain A; Delotte J
J Visc Surg; 2014 Oct; 151(5):335-9. PubMed ID: 25214433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Skills comparison using a 2D vs. 3D laparoscopic simulator].
Romero-Loera S; Cárdenas-Lailson LE; de la Concha-Bermejillo F; Crisanto-Campos BA; Valenzuela-Salazar C; Moreno-Portillo M
Cir Cir; 2016; 84(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 26259739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
