These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26053359)

  • 21. Proposal of concentration limits for determining the hazard property HP 14 for waste using ecotoxicological tests.
    Hennebert P
    Waste Manag; 2018 Apr; 74():74-85. PubMed ID: 29221872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Recent Developments in Species Sensitivity Distribution Modeling.
    Fox DR; van Dam RA; Fisher R; Batley GE; Tillmanns AR; Thorley J; Schwarz CJ; Spry DJ; McTavish K
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2021 Feb; 40(2):293-308. PubMed ID: 33170526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Estimation of wildlife hazard levels using interspecies correlation models and standard laboratory rodent toxicity data.
    Awkerman JA; Raimondo S; Barron MG
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2009; 72(24):1604-9. PubMed ID: 20077235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. QSAR modeling of cumulative environmental end-points for the prioritization of hazardous chemicals.
    Gramatica P; Papa E; Sangion A
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2018 Jan; 20(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 29226926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An Assessment of the Robustness of the COSHH-Essentials (C-E) Target Airborne Concentration Ranges 15 Years on, and Their Usefulness for Determining Control Measures.
    Vaughan NP; Rajan-Sithamparanadarajah R
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 Apr; 61(3):270-283. PubMed ID: 28355421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Difference of Species Sensitivities for Aquatic Life Criteria in China and the USA].
    Wang XN; Yan ZG; Yu RZ; Wang WH; Chen LH; Liu ZT
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2016 Aug; 37(8):3216-3223. PubMed ID: 29964753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Classifying bio-concentration factor with random forest algorithm, influence of the bio-accumulative vs. non-bio-accumulative compound ratio to modelling result, and applicability domain for random forest model.
    Piir G; Sild S; Maran U
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2014; 25(12):967-81. PubMed ID: 25482723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Do we have to incorporate ecological interactions in the sensitivity assessment of ecosystems? An examination of a theoretical assumption underlying species sensitivity distribution models.
    De Laender F; De Schamphelaere KA; Vanrolleghem PA; Janssen CR
    Environ Int; 2008 Apr; 34(3):390-6. PubMed ID: 17977598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Chronic toxicity of tributyltin to development and reproduction of the European freshwater snail Lymnaea stagnalis (L.).
    Leung KM; Grist EP; Morley NJ; Morritt D; Crane M
    Chemosphere; 2007 Jan; 66(7):1358-66. PubMed ID: 16876231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A probabilistic method for species sensitivity distributions taking into account the inherent uncertainty and variability of effects to estimate environmental risk.
    Gottschalk F; Nowack B
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jan; 9(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 22745057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Statistical uncertainty in hazardous terrestrial concentrations estimated with aquatic ecotoxicity data.
    Golsteijn L; van Zelm R; Hendriks AJ; Huijbregts MA
    Chemosphere; 2013 Sep; 93(2):366-72. PubMed ID: 23735489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A statistical evaluation of the safety factor and species sensitivity distribution approaches to deriving environmental quality guidelines.
    Zajdlik BA
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2016 Apr; 12(2):380-7. PubMed ID: 26272692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Deriving a water quality guideline for protection of aquatic communities exposed to triclosan in the Canadian environment.
    Hill KL; Breton RL; Manning GE; Teed RS; Capdevielle M; Slezak B
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2018 Jul; 14(4):437-441. PubMed ID: 29528192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Development and application of the SSD approach in scientific case studies for ecological risk assessment.
    Del Signore A; Hendriks AJ; Lenders HJ; Leuven RS; Breure AM
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Sep; 35(9):2149-61. PubMed ID: 27144499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of specific versus literature species sensitivity distributions for herbicides risk assessment.
    Larras F; Gregorio V; Bouchez A; Montuelle B; Chèvre N
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Feb; 23(4):3042-52. PubMed ID: 26396014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimation of herbicide species sensitivity distribution using single-species algal toxicity data and information on the mode of action.
    Nagai T; Taya K
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2015 Mar; 34(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 25475367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of the agreement between modeled and monitored ambient hazardous air pollutants in California.
    Garcia E; Hurley S; Nelson DO; Gunier RB; Hertz A; Reynolds P
    Int J Environ Health Res; 2014 Aug; 24(4):363-77. PubMed ID: 24047281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development of a general baseline toxicity QSAR model for the fish embryo acute toxicity test.
    Klüver N; Vogs C; Altenburger R; Escher BI; Scholz S
    Chemosphere; 2016 Dec; 164():164-173. PubMed ID: 27588575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Improving substance information in USEtox
    Saouter E; Aschberger K; Fantke P; Hauschild MZ; Kienzler A; Paini A; Pant R; Radovnikovic A; Secchi M; Sala S
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2017 Dec; 36(12):3463-3470. PubMed ID: 28671290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Response to: Quantifying the precision of ecological risk: Misunderstandings and errors in the methods for assessment factors versus species sensitivity distributions by Drs. Scott E. Belanger and Gregory J. Carr.
    Kamo M; Sorgog K
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2021 Jan; 207():111542. PubMed ID: 33254402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.