These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26053422)

  • 1. Automating network meta-analysis.
    van Valkenhoef G; Lu G; de Brock B; Hillege H; Ades AE; Welton NJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2012 Dec; 3(4):285-99. PubMed ID: 26053422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implementing informative priors for heterogeneity in meta-analysis using meta-regression and pseudo data.
    Rhodes KM; Turner RM; White IR; Jackson D; Spiegelhalter DJ; Higgins JP
    Stat Med; 2016 Dec; 35(29):5495-5511. PubMed ID: 27577523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modelling heterogeneity variances in multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis--are informative priors the better solution?
    Thorlund K; Thabane L; Mills EJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jan; 13():2. PubMed ID: 23311298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis.
    Dias S; Welton NJ; Caldwell DM; Ades AE
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):932-44. PubMed ID: 20213715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons.
    Lu G; Ades AE
    Stat Med; 2004 Oct; 23(20):3105-24. PubMed ID: 15449338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unsolved issues of mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis: network size and inconsistency.
    Sturtz S; Bender R
    Res Synth Methods; 2012 Dec; 3(4):300-11. PubMed ID: 26053423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Bayesian missing data framework for generalized multiple outcome mixed treatment comparisons.
    Hong H; Chu H; Zhang J; Carlin BP
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Mar; 7(1):6-22. PubMed ID: 26536149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two new methods to fit models for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects.
    Law M; Jackson D; Turner R; Rhodes K; Viechtbauer W
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():87. PubMed ID: 27465416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS.
    Lambert PC; Sutton AJ; Burton PR; Abrams KR; Jones DR
    Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(15):2401-28. PubMed ID: 16015676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The choice of prior distribution for a covariance matrix in multivariate meta-analysis: a simulation study.
    Hurtado Rúa SM; Mazumdar M; Strawderman RL
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(30):4083-104. PubMed ID: 26303671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta-regression.
    White IR; Barrett JK; Jackson D; Higgins JP
    Res Synth Methods; 2012 Jun; 3(2):111-25. PubMed ID: 26062085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies with interpretable priors.
    Guo J; Riebler A; Rue H
    Stat Med; 2017 Aug; 36(19):3039-3058. PubMed ID: 28474394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assumptions of Mixed Treatment Comparisons in Health Technology Assessments - Challenges and Possible Steps for Practical Application.
    Reken S; Sturtz S; Kiefer C; Böhler YB; Wieseler B
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160712. PubMed ID: 27508415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Network meta-analysis: application and practice using R software.
    Shim SR; Kim SJ; Lee J; Rücker G
    Epidemiol Health; 2019; 41():e2019013. PubMed ID: 30999733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methods used to conduct and report Bayesian mixed treatment comparisons published in the medical literature: a systematic review.
    Sobieraj DM; Cappelleri JC; Baker WL; Phung OJ; White CM; Coleman CI
    BMJ Open; 2013; 3(7):. PubMed ID: 23878173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.