These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Encrustation of indwelling urethral catheters by Proteus mirabilis biofilms growing in human urine. Morris NS; Stickler DJ J Hosp Infect; 1998 Jul; 39(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 9699143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The problem of catheter encrustation. Bruce AW; Sira SS; Clark AF; Awad SA Can Med Assoc J; 1974 Aug; 111(3):238-9 passim. PubMed ID: 4855013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Which indwelling urethral catheters resist encrustation by Proteus mirabilis biofilms? Morris NS; Stickler DJ; Winters C Br J Urol; 1997 Jul; 80(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 9240181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Design and validation of a dynamic flow model simulating encrustation of biomaterials in the urinary tract. Gorman SP; Garvin CP; Quigley F; Jones DS J Pharm Pharmacol; 2003 Apr; 55(4):461-8. PubMed ID: 12803767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Novel coating to reduce medical device encrustation. Su SH Med Device Technol; 2004; 15(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 14994632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of in vitro encrustation on silicone and hydrogel-coated latex catheters. Cox AJ; Hukins DW; Sutton TM Br J Urol; 1988 Feb; 61(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 3349281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Resistance of catheters coated with a modified hydrogel to encrustation during an in vitro test. Cox AJ; Millington RS; Hukins DW; Sutton TM Urol Res; 1989; 17(6):353-6. PubMed ID: 2623790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The encrustation of indwelling catheters. Getliffe KA; Mulhall AB Br J Urol; 1991 Apr; 67(4):337-41. PubMed ID: 2032070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Studies on the formation of crystalline bacterial biofilms on urethral catheters. Stickler D; Morris N; Moreno MC; Sabbuba N Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1998 Sep; 17(9):649-52. PubMed ID: 9832268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of encrustation behaviour on urinary tract biomaterials. Gorman SP; Tunney MM J Biomater Appl; 1997 Oct; 12(2):136-66. PubMed ID: 9399139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Infection of catheterised patients: bacterial colonisation of encrusted Foley catheters shown by scanning electron microscopy. Cox AJ; Hukins DW; Sutton TM Urol Res; 1989; 17(6):349-52. PubMed ID: 2560278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A clinical assessment of the performance of a sensor to detect crystalline biofilm formation on indwelling bladder catheters. Stickler DJ; Jones SM; Adusei GO; Waters MG; Cloete J; Mathur S; Feneley RC BJU Int; 2006 Dec; 98(6):1244-9. PubMed ID: 17026594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acidification of urine is not a feasible method for preventing encrustation of indwelling urinary catheters. Bibby JM; Hukins DW Scand J Urol Nephrol; 1993; 27(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 8493469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does drinking cranberry juice produce urine inhibitory to the development of crystalline, catheter-blocking Proteus mirabilis biofilms? Morris NS; Stickler DJ BJU Int; 2001 Aug; 88(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 11488728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A model to quantify encrustation on ureteric stents, urethral catheters and polymers intended for urological use. Choong SK; Wood S; Whitfield HN BJU Int; 2000 Sep; 86(4):414-21. PubMed ID: 10971264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Formation of encrustations on indwelling urinary catheters in the elderly: a comparison of different types of catheter materials in "blockers" and "nonblockers". Kunin CM; Chin QF; Chambers S J Urol; 1987 Oct; 138(4):899-902. PubMed ID: 3656551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]