These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26053947)

  • 1. Reporting of financial conflicts of interest in meta-analyses of drug trials published in high-impact medical journals: comparison of results from 2017 to 2018 and 2009.
    Benea C; Turner KA; Roseman M; Bero LA; Lexchin J; Turner EH; Thombs BD
    Syst Rev; 2020 Apr; 9(1):77. PubMed ID: 32268911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies.
    Siontis KC; Hernandez-Boussard T; Ioannidis JP
    BMJ; 2013 Jul; 347():f4501. PubMed ID: 23873947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Academic inequality through the lens of community ecology: a meta-analysis.
    Mori AS; Qian S; Tatsumi S
    PeerJ; 2015; 3():e1457. PubMed ID: 26644987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How do you know if you should perform a meta-analysis in a field where previous meta-analyses have already been performed?
    Botella J; Sánchez-Meca J
    Cir Esp (Engl Ed); 2024 Jun; 102(6):338-339. PubMed ID: 38614315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of pelvic floor muscle training alone or as part of a general physical activity program during pregnancy on urinary incontinence, episiotomy and third- or fourth-degree perineal tear: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    Zhang D; Bo K; Montejo R; Sánchez-Polán M; Silva-José C; Palacio M; Barakat R
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2024 Jun; 103(6):1015-1027. PubMed ID: 38140841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of industry sponsorship on the quality of systematic reviews of vaccines: a cross-sectional analysis of studies published from 2016 to 2019.
    Pieper D; Hellbrecht I; Zhao L; Baur C; Pick G; Schneider S; Harder T; Young K; Tricco AC; Westhaver E; Tunis M
    Syst Rev; 2022 Aug; 11(1):174. PubMed ID: 35996186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Updating Perspectives on Meta-Analyses in the Field of Radiation Oncology.
    Shin IS; Rim CH
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Jan; 57(2):. PubMed ID: 33525358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the quality of meta-analyses in systematic reviews in pharmaceutical research in Iran by 2016: A systematic review.
    Amanollahi A; Moradi-Lakeh M; Shokraneh F; Bashiri Y; Mahmudi L
    Med J Islam Repub Iran; 2020; 34():30. PubMed ID: 32617269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Financial conflicts of interest in systematic reviews: associations with results, conclusions, and methodological quality.
    Hansen C; Lundh A; Rasmussen K; Hróbjartsson A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Aug; 8(8):MR000047. PubMed ID: 31425611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Industry-supported meta-analyses compared with meta-analyses with non-profit or no support: differences in methodological quality and conclusions.
    Jørgensen AW; Maric KL; Tendal B; Faurschou A; Gøtzsche PC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 Sep; 8():60. PubMed ID: 18782430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reporting of conflicts of interest in meta-analyses of trials of pharmacological treatments.
    Roseman M; Milette K; Bero LA; Coyne JC; Lexchin J; Turner EH; Thombs BD
    JAMA; 2011 Mar; 305(10):1008-17. PubMed ID: 21386079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methodological quality of meta-analyses: matched-pairs comparison over time and between industry-sponsored and academic-sponsored reports.
    Lane PW; Higgins JP; Anagnostelis B; Anzures-Cabrera J; Baker NF; Cappelleri JC; Haughie S; Hollis S; Lewis SC; Moneuse P; Whitehead A
    Res Synth Methods; 2013 Dec; 4(4):342-50. PubMed ID: 26053947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review.
    Jørgensen AW; Hilden J; Gøtzsche PC
    BMJ; 2006 Oct; 333(7572):782. PubMed ID: 17028106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reporting of drug trial funding sources and author financial conflicts of interest in Cochrane and non-Cochrane meta-analyses: a cross-sectional study.
    Turner K; Carboni-Jiménez A; Benea C; Elder K; Levis B; Boruff J; Roseman M; Bero L; Lexchin J; Turner EH; Benedetti A; Thombs BD
    BMJ Open; 2020 May; 10(5):e035633. PubMed ID: 32398334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.